08:00:23 <ifat_afek> #startmeeting vitrage
08:00:23 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Dec 12 08:00:23 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ifat_afek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:00:24 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:00:26 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'vitrage'
08:00:31 <ifat_afek> Hi :-)
08:01:24 <e0ne> hi
08:01:35 <eyalb1> \o/
08:01:56 <idan_hefetz> greetings :)
08:03:23 <ifat_afek> #topic Status and updates
08:03:34 <ifat_afek> No special updates.
08:03:40 <ifat_afek> I’m about to finish both the Nova versioned notifications support and the removal of the static physical datasource
08:03:46 <ifat_afek> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/623274/
08:03:50 <ifat_afek> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/624033/
08:03:59 <ifat_afek> In addition, we should progress with the integration of Vitrage and Monasca
08:04:04 <ifat_afek> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/622899/
08:04:30 <ifat_afek> We need to decide how Vitrage will know which resource is related to the alarm, based on Monasca dimensions
08:04:48 <ifat_afek> I sent an email to the ML yesterday, waiting for feedback from Monasca team
08:04:51 <ifat_afek> That’s it for me
08:05:39 <e0ne> I'm still working on vitrage-dashboard and xtatic
08:05:58 <e0ne> here is some kind of preparation/workaround https://review.openstack.org/#/c/622939/
08:06:31 <e0ne> it doesn't fix all issues, but unblocks distros like debian to package vitrage-dashboard
08:07:07 <ifat_afek> e0ne: Alon and I looked at it yesterday, and I’m about to test it on my env. What am I expected to see? is it something that we should merge or WIP?
08:07:36 <e0ne> ifat_afek: it should not break anything
08:07:57 <e0ne> ifat_afek: and it's definitely good idea to test it before merge
08:08:02 <ifat_afek> e0ne: so if nothing is broken, we should approve it?
08:08:20 <ifat_afek> What else is missing?
08:08:20 <e0ne> ifat_afek: it's up to core team to approve or not :)
08:08:43 <ifat_afek> Of course ;-) just trying to see the whole picture - what is in and what is left to be done
08:09:03 <ifat_afek> And splitting the work to different changes is always a good idea
08:09:11 <e0ne> ifat_afek: it's some kind of workaround if we can't switch to xstatic in this release
08:09:33 <ifat_afek> And why not? because it’s too much work?
08:09:43 <idankin> Hi
08:10:00 <e0ne> ifat_afek: mostly because on a slow progress on this  effort :(
08:10:12 <e0ne> I'll do my best to finish it next weeks
08:10:37 <ifat_afek> Ok. So we can approve this change and then maybe we’ll have a better fix later on and maybe not, but in any case it’ll solve the most urgent problem?
08:10:42 <e0ne> but if we can improve something right now, IMO we should do it
08:10:59 <e0ne> ifat_afek: exactly
08:11:11 <ifat_afek> Ok, makes sense. Thanks for your help!
08:12:08 <idan_hefetz> Me?
08:12:13 <ifat_afek> Go for it
08:12:41 <idan_hefetz> I'm working on a nice small improvement, to change the time worker processes are forked to as early as possible, and avoid forked processes containing allot of irrelevant objects in memory.
08:12:58 <idan_hefetz> It's quite an easy change, for when vitrage starts from scratch (for the first time), and it greatly reduces the memory wasted.
08:14:06 <ifat_afek> Great, thanks
08:14:23 <ifat_afek> Anyone else?
08:16:31 <ifat_afek> Ok, see you next week
08:16:40 <e0ne> see you next week!
08:16:45 <eyalb1> bye
08:16:49 <Marina_Koushnir> bye
08:17:03 <ifat_afek> #endmeeting