08:00:29 <ifat_afek> #startmeeting vitrage
08:00:29 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Mar 22 08:00:29 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ifat_afek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:00:30 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:00:32 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'vitrage'
08:00:37 <danoffek> Hi again
08:00:42 <ifat_afek> Hi :-)
08:00:54 <eyalb> \o
08:01:00 <elisha_r> hi
08:02:48 <usman> hi
08:04:21 <ifat_afek> Le’ts start
08:04:27 <ifat_afek> Today’s agenda:
08:04:30 <alexey_weyl> hello everyone
08:04:32 <ifat_afek> •	Status and Updates
08:04:37 <ifat_afek> •	Boston Summit
08:04:42 <ifat_afek> •	Open Discussion
08:04:47 <ifat_afek> #topic Status and Updates
08:04:56 <ifat_afek> I didn’t do much this week, was sick part of it.
08:05:02 <ifat_afek> Regarding Doctor: I finished the implementation, but still need to verify the test on an OPNFV pod.
08:05:11 <ifat_afek> On the meeting yesterday, Ryota suggested that we have a dedicated POD for Vitrage tests, or to complete Apex installation until E-release
08:05:23 <ifat_afek> He said that the Apex task is very big and risky. I need to evaluate both options and better understand the requirements.
08:05:36 <ifat_afek> That’s it for me
08:05:44 <ifat_afek> Who’s next?
08:05:56 <danoffek> I can update about the state of Vitrage ID
08:06:39 <danoffek> No change yet, still fixing tempest tests to support Vitrage ID change
08:06:59 <danoffek> I don't think I'll have it ready this week.
08:07:07 <danoffek> Thanks, Anna, for joining
08:07:20 <danoffek> In any case, hopefully next week I'll have a better update
08:07:22 <danoffek> That's it
08:07:39 <ifat_afek> danoffek: Ok, thanks
08:08:08 <annarez> Hi all
08:08:50 <yujunz> On my side, not much work done last week due to the OPNFV release milestones
08:08:51 <annarez> I wrote the blueprint for snmp support in Vitrage
08:09:02 <danoffek> :)
08:09:42 <ifat_afek> Ok, thanks
08:09:53 <ifat_afek> yujunz: Any other updates?
08:09:58 <yujunz> Yes
08:10:42 <yujunz> I will continue on @Weiya's bp about alarm deduction next week
08:11:00 <ifat_afek> Great, I was going to ask about that
08:11:00 <yujunz> Hope to deliver the design before MS1
08:11:23 <yujunz> I want to ask about the status of alarm aggregation
08:11:29 <ifat_afek> We will also try to check idan_hefetz’s proposal, to see if it matches
08:11:56 <ifat_afek> Nothing happened regarding alarm aggregation. AFAIK, nobody is working on that
08:12:02 <ifat_afek> Why?
08:12:04 <yujunz> Yes, I shall consider weiya, idan_hefretz proposals
08:12:11 <yujunz> idan_hefetz sorry
08:12:12 <ifat_afek> And your proposal
08:12:32 <yujunz> Of course :-)
08:13:06 <yujunz> Basically we are trying to handle the requirement of Nokia's use case and ZTE's use case and back compatibiity on existing interfaces
08:13:24 <ifat_afek> Right
08:13:49 <yujunz> That's all
08:14:08 <ifat_afek> Ok, thanks. So we’ll be in touch regarding the design later on
08:14:14 <ifat_afek> Who else wants to update?
08:14:28 <alexey_weyl> I have an update
08:14:57 <alexey_weyl> I really but really really want to finish the "not" operator support for the templates and teh evaluator
08:15:04 <alexey_weyl> That is it for now
08:15:09 <ifat_afek> Thanks :-)
08:15:23 <ifat_afek> Anyone else?
08:15:39 <dwj> I'll update. I will continue to implement the `resource list` and `resource show` APIs. :)
08:16:05 <ifat_afek> dwj: Great!
08:16:40 <alexey_weyl> That's cool. But dong, don't forget the those APIs needs to support Multi tenancy as well as --all-tenants
08:16:45 <dwj> I register a bp and proposed a patch #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447980/
08:17:18 <ifat_afek> Cool, we’ll review it
08:17:19 <dwj> alexey_weyl, ok
08:18:00 <ifat_afek> Any other updates?
08:18:02 <dwj> That's all.
08:18:41 <ifat_afek> Moving on
08:18:43 <ifat_afek> #topic Boston Summit
08:18:52 <ifat_afek> We were supposed to finish the brainstorming on the Forum session until yesterday…
08:19:00 <ifat_afek> we have one more week to submit the session proposals
08:19:14 <ifat_afek> Please enter the etherpad and write a short description on the topics that interest you, and then we’ll vote (or submit all)
08:19:23 <ifat_afek> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum
08:19:31 <ifat_afek> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-Vitrage-brainstorming
08:20:26 <ifat_afek> Anything else regarding the Boston Summit?
08:21:21 <ifat_afek> BTW, it’s not clear that we’ll get the forum sessions that we want. I’m not so sure about the criteria for approving them
08:22:04 <ifat_afek> #topic Open Discussion
08:22:10 <ifat_afek> Any other issue you would like to raise?
08:22:58 <yujunz> About alarm aggregation
08:23:07 <ifat_afek> Right :-)
08:23:18 <yujunz> I'm asking about it because it may relate to alarm deduction
08:23:42 <yujunz> So if somebody is starting to work on it, please add me as reviewer
08:24:11 <ifat_afek> I agree that we need alarm aggregation once we implement the alarm deduction bp
08:24:33 <ifat_afek> OK to your request, but of course you can become a reviewer even if we don’t add you
08:24:48 <ifat_afek> A complex bp like that won’t be approved so quickly I guess…
08:25:03 <yujunz> Yes, I have created a filter in openstack gerrit
08:25:34 <yujunz> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/(project:openstack/vitrage+OR+project:openstack/vitrage-specs+)+AND+status:open
08:25:51 <yujunz> I suppose this will filter out all the open reviews about vitrage core, right?
08:26:39 <ifat_afek> You can also get notifications for every new change
08:26:59 <ifat_afek> I think that filter is ok
08:27:25 <ifat_afek> If you set your settings/watched projects, you will get notifications and won’t need the filter
08:27:47 <yujunz> Normally, I would ignore email notification since there are too many...
08:27:52 <ifat_afek> :-)
08:28:07 <yujunz> So I'm working in PULL mode instead of PUSH
08:28:32 <yujunz> Another subject we are watching is persistent database, any progress?
08:28:41 <ifat_afek> I think we better start thinking about the alarm aggregation, but AFAIK nobody is doing it at the moment. So maybe we’ll wait for the alarm deduction design
08:28:53 <ifat_afek> Not yet… unfortunately
08:29:10 <ifat_afek> Everyone seems busy in other tasks
08:29:43 <yujunz> Understandable but the MS1 is quite close. It is April 14, right?
08:29:51 <ifat_afek> I think so
08:30:05 <ifat_afek> I agree that we better give it a higher priority
08:30:43 <ifat_afek> Any other issue?
08:30:47 <yujunz> Nope
08:31:51 <ifat_afek> Ok, goodbye then
08:31:59 <elisha_r> bye
08:32:09 <eyalb> bye
08:32:10 <usman> bye
08:32:10 <dwj> bye
08:32:36 <ifat_afek> #endmeeting