14:30:30 #startmeeting UX 14:30:31 Meeting started Wed Jun 18 14:30:30 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jcoufal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:30:32 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:30:33 hello all 14:30:36 The meeting name has been set to 'ux' 14:30:38 hi all 14:31:08 hi all! 14:31:30 hi liz, jarda and others 14:32:18 I hope there is more of us 14:32:21 Hi 14:32:46 hi everyone 14:33:45 I hope it's not the alternating time what prevents people from attending the meeting 14:33:59 I did find it a little confusing :) 14:34:23 since you have to count the wednesdays past the monday. but that could just be me 14:34:53 jarda, we could start? 14:35:08 if that would be problematic I think we should stick to Mondays only then 14:35:11 let's start 14:35:16 yeah…I was thinking it might get confusing if we have to skip a week to technically do 1st monday of the month…oh well! 14:35:20 yes 14:35:36 #topic StoryBoard for UX 14:36:04 so I discussed with krotscheck and jblair 14:36:14 okay 14:36:27 it looks there are some issues to add a project into the StoryBoard which does not have a git repo 14:36:47 and as long as we don't need one it doesn't make big sense to create one just for this purpose 14:36:53 (infra team doesn't like it) 14:37:28 so we continue with launchpad ? 14:37:41 so there needs to go a patch to jeepyb which should allow us to do that 14:37:52 so at the moment I suggest to stick with launchpad 14:38:01 and we will move to storyboard once it is ready 14:38:11 but there will be a future fix in storyboard? 14:38:15 cool 14:38:21 jackib: it should 14:38:29 it will just take a bit longer then few days 14:38:39 s/then/than 14:38:40 Infra likes the idea of having UX in storyboard. They just don’t like having unused git repositories lying around. 14:38:58 yeah, that's the biggest concern 14:39:08 also naming of openstack-ux, but that's a minor issue 14:39:27 So if you guys are content with keeping the status quo, then Launchpad is fine. This is OpenStack though, nothing will get done unless someone cares enough to do it themselves. 14:40:13 krotscheck: I believe we really would like to jump to StoryBoard 14:40:33 krotscheck: yes, I'm not content with LaunchPad :) 14:40:49 I will keep track on it and talk to you krotscheck so that we can clarify all concerns 14:41:08 I have no concerns - I just don’t know python well enough to do this for you guys. 14:41:26 krotscheck: ah, I see, I will try to find someone who could help 14:41:32 I’m sure there’s SOMEONE in this meeting willing to do it? 14:41:33 https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/jeepyb/tree/jeepyb 14:42:40 * lblanchard has zero python knowledge… 14:42:48 no volunteers yet :-/ but we will sort it out 14:42:50 but maybe someone from the Horizon team could help us out? 14:42:52 haha 14:43:17 #topic Wireframes review tool and its progress 14:43:33 adi__: this is your time :) 14:43:36 yes 14:43:38 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/uxtools 14:44:00 i am currently in the process of reviewing them - have seen 2 so far 14:44:29 Concept.ly & Notism 14:44:42 not invision? 14:45:07 i've seen invision already, just haven't put it on the list yet 14:45:19 concept is free and in beta at this stage 14:45:37 quite useful. the only downside is that it does not support uploading of PDFs 14:46:23 there is no limit on uploading files for concept 14:46:37 adi__: Does concept have plans to support PDF? Any idea? 14:46:43 i would encourage you to look at these 2 for now and provide feedback 14:46:52 yea, PDF is pretty important 14:47:06 i'm afraid i can't answer that right now as nowhere on the website it is mentioned 14:47:06 I'll definitely check these out and add my feedback to this etherpad 14:47:11 notism supports all the formats 14:47:21 and is very much like invision 14:47:45 the notism free tier provides 1 GB of upload 14:48:05 no. of collaborators / reviewers not mentioned 14:48:38 didnt find any opensource tool 14:48:49 adi__: 1 GB storage in total? 14:48:51 for collaboration / review 14:49:00 yes, 1 gb for the free tier 14:49:26 shouldn't it be enough? 14:49:35 That won't go far 14:49:39 for some time, yes 14:49:47 but longer term... 14:49:48 is it per month? or ever? 14:50:04 forever i guess :) 14:50:25 yes, 1 gb for ever 14:50:34 adi__: have you guys found any tool which we can host by ourselves? 14:50:42 yeah…considering we will be posting just images it will last a bit…but will fill up eventually 14:50:59 found one called layerVault 14:51:45 ah layervault is nice 14:51:53 but self-hosting is enterprise version 14:52:06 yes 14:52:17 so probably expensive 14:52:42 rest of the ones are pretty much paid apps 14:53:00 yeah, we don't wanna go this way 14:53:17 if storage isnt a huge issue, i would recomemnd concept and notism 14:53:30 alright 14:53:45 i guess you should take a look and update the etherpad 14:53:54 in the next meeting we could finalize the tool to be used 14:54:11 awesome 14:54:21 do you need any help with this adi__ ? 14:54:24 welllll…. 14:54:36 not really, i'm okay 14:54:47 I suggest before finalizing we do some test runs. You always run into unexpected bumps with tools like thiat 14:54:48 this 14:55:08 yes, hence we should all take a shot at them 14:55:22 may be share a few screens and see the effectiveness 14:55:48 adi__: _1 14:55:51 +1 14:55:52 haha 14:56:11 sounds good! 14:56:13 jackib: +1 14:56:17 alright, cool 14:56:21 adi__: +1 14:56:24 great 14:56:36 good job so far adi__ 14:56:52 #topic Cross-project UI library 14:56:54 thx, will keep on updating the etherpad 14:57:18 so, this is mixed effort from multiple projects 14:57:20 [UX] [Heat] [Mistral] [Murano] [Neutron] [Solum] 14:57:23 in particular 14:57:37 okay 14:57:52 at the moment there is requirements gathering 14:57:53 jarda, is this similar to what i've been talking about, for heat? 14:58:10 adi__: I guess a bit different, but somewhat related 14:58:15 okay 14:58:33 here is the ongoing conversation: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-June/037054.html 14:59:00 and the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/9XQ7Q2NQdv 14:59:30 also related gdoc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/19Q9JwoO77724RyOp7XkpYmALwmdb7JjoQHcDv4ffZ-I/edit# 14:59:47 these guys asked for UX help which is great 15:00:01 anybody interested in helping there? 15:00:01 yes 15:00:25 I was a bit involved earlier 15:00:30 but not heavily 15:00:36 okay, for which project? 15:01:25 adi__: what do you mean? 15:01:44 I think a good step would be (if anyone has time/interest) to give feedback on the Google doc…https://docs.google.com/document/d/19Q9JwoO77724RyOp7XkpYmALwmdb7JjoQHcDv4ffZ-I/edit# 15:01:57 i meant, which service did you work on, heat, murano? 15:02:36 adi__: I meant I was involved a bit in this discussion and the library effort 15:02:38 but that does not matter. i would be willing to look at heat in particular, given i already have some ideas there 15:02:47 not directly in one or another project 15:02:53 so whoever is interested in helping here 15:03:14 I think lblanchard had a good point - let's start with contributing to the gdoc 15:03:47 okay 15:05:04 any volunteers? 15:05:04 I got an error when I clicked on this doc. anyone else? 15:05:05 :) 15:05:26 jackib1: https://docs.google.com/document/d/19Q9JwoO77724RyOp7XkpYmALwmdb7JjoQHcDv4ffZ-I/edit# 15:05:29 how about i take a look and get back later? 15:05:48 jackib1: try that link…the one I sent earlier got munged 15:05:57 yep thanks! 15:06:20 OK, I have another meeting. I'll catch up on the rest of the meeting later 15:06:28 bye 15:06:37 bye bye jackib1 15:06:49 thanks jackib1! 15:07:56 adi__: sure, give it a shot when you can 15:08:20 alright, let's move on 15:08:23 #topic Faceted Search 15:08:44 who suggested this topic? 15:09:19 ah that was me :) 15:09:28 similar to the last topic... 15:09:50 there is an effort going on around faceted search that I think we could help with by giving some feedback 15:10:12 maybe with respect to requirements to begin (what we would see being helpful in the UI for search) 15:10:15 lblanchard: is it alive? 15:10:41 I mean the effort 15:10:46 jcoufal: I saw some recent activity from travis 15:10:56 so it made me wonder if we should jump in at all 15:11:17 I just know that this BP (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/faceted-search) is around for a very long time 15:11:27 there were various inititatives (like elastic search) 15:11:41 but they it was turned down 15:11:50 I think the biggest blocker are the APIs 15:12:00 yeah…sounds like maybe travis has the latest initiative… 15:12:13 and the other approach was indexing 15:12:15 jcoufal: I wonder if having a few wireframes around searching on a table in Horizon would be good 15:12:42 jcoufal: that way we could have a proposal and let folks figure out the technical details, but we've at least thrown in what would be good from a user point of view feature wise... 15:12:52 lblanchard: wasn't this intended for searching throughout the whole OpenStack? 15:13:10 jcoufal: ah yes, now I remember…Travis is working on Graffiti 15:13:33 jcoufal: right…we could definitely give feedback for other search requirements 15:13:42 jcoufal: and Graffiti is focused on tagging 15:13:48 clever name :) 15:14:02 nice :) 15:14:11 well tagging is important in general 15:14:18 so it would be nice to get involved 15:14:26 right…I at least wanted to bring it up here incase anyone has done anything yet 15:14:30 and express the expactations for the UI 15:14:34 and to advertise if anyone is interested 15:14:40 exactly 15:14:58 I guess as long as we are the only two left here, we should bring it up next time 15:15:25 sounds good to leave it on the agenda for next time, thank you 15:15:27 I would also suggest to stop alternating and have regular bi-weekly meetings on Monday instead - not to confuse people more :) 15:15:48 heh, sounds good to me…doesn't seem like we've gotten any attendance that we didn't have for that first meeting 15:16:41 I'll write an e-mail to the mailing list and probably we should continue with the regular Monday meetings once in 2 weeks 15:16:49 so every second Monday 15:17:03 okay 15:17:17 jcoufal: it might get a bit tricky 15:17:18 starting from July 7th I would say - since that's the scheduled next meeting 15:17:26 lblanchard: would it? 15:17:42 jcoufal: if we say the 1st and 3rd monday of the month…in certain months we'd skip 2 weeks in a row based on when Monday falls 15:17:55 jcoufal: just a small thing about choosing specific mondays in the month 15:18:12 nope, I would say each "odd" or "even" week 15:18:15 however, if we schedule it for every other monday and have an invite, maybe that would work better? 15:18:34 take July for example 15:18:43 I completely agree 15:18:49 oh okay 15:18:49 I didn't want to say 1st and 3rd 15:18:55 every other Monday 15:18:55 cool 15:19:01 we are on the same page then :) 15:19:04 sounds good! 15:19:10 starting from July 7th 15:19:18 so we have 3 weeks off now 15:19:27 3 weeks is quite a gap 15:19:34 i think we should do one after 2 weeks 15:19:40 any comments? 15:20:06 we will have to move the officially scheduled one 15:20:17 not that it is big deal 15:20:24 I will check in the mailing list 15:20:45 sounds good 15:20:46 probably June 30th sounds better 15:20:55 yes 15:21:07 Keep eyes on the mailing list please 15:21:09 yeah, June 30th sounds good 15:21:13 will do 15:21:20 #topic Open discussion 15:21:31 we already started but any other issues? 15:22:03 lblanchard, adi__? 15:22:06 im good 15:22:27 since you are the two brave ones left :) 15:22:34 haha 15:22:46 all set! 15:22:54 great 15:23:03 thanks a lot for your participation and help 15:23:25 #endmeeting