18:02:38 #startmeeting uc 18:02:38 Meeting started Mon Oct 1 18:02:38 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mrhillsman. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:02:39 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:02:41 The meeting name has been set to 'uc' 18:02:53 #topic RollCall 18:02:55 o/ 18:03:15 o/ 18:03:17 o/ 18:03:17 sorry to make y'all raise ya hands again :) 18:04:06 Fine :) 18:05:19 o/ 18:05:41 o? 18:05:42 #topic Retrospective 18:06:06 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/uc 18:07:27 feel free to add to that 18:07:40 anything we need to discuss in particular from last month? 18:07:48 outside of the user survey ;) 18:08:40 mrhillsman, I have brought up to ask AUC status regarding translators after seeing a comment from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/604002/ 18:09:17 we agreed that translators should have AUC status 18:09:38 Wow.. thanks a lot! 18:09:57 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/uc-stein-ptg line 123 18:10:03 thank YOU ianychoi 18:10:22 the amount of work you all do on the various projects is very impressive and we are very appreciative 18:10:24 +1 18:10:41 For ATC status, >=300 words for translation or review is regarded. How about AUC status? >= 300 words for uc related translation activities would be worth? 18:11:03 aprice, thank u :) 18:11:29 i think it is reasonable to match that criteria 18:12:05 agreed 18:12:32 #startvote Should AUC be given to translators with min 300 words translated? Yes, No, Abstain 18:12:33 Begin voting on: Should AUC be given to translators with min 300 words translated? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain. 18:12:34 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 18:12:37 #vote Yes 18:13:00 #vote Yes 18:13:02 #vote Yes 18:13:15 #vote yes 18:13:22 #endvote 18:13:23 Voted on "Should AUC be given to translators with min 300 words translated?" Results are 18:13:24 Yes (4): josephrsandoval, spotz, VW_, mrhillsman 18:13:34 thx ianychoi ! 18:13:48 Thanks a lot User Committee :) 18:13:57 alright, anything else before we move on to survey? 18:14:44 Nope from me :) 18:15:56 #topic User Survey 18:16:06 yay :) 18:16:08 so, aprice jamesmcarthur i think something weird is happening 18:16:13 oh dear 18:16:22 i did a lot of the feature request questions one 18:16:25 but they are missing 18:16:38 sorry - FurtherEnhancement 18:16:47 ah i was about to ask for clarification :) 18:17:11 probably like at least 30 i know for sure 18:17:27 cause i tested it again after not being sure 18:17:31 tested it today 18:17:45 ok - looking now. jamesmcarthur wasn't able to join today, but we are synching on it afterwards and can walk through it. 18:17:50 is anyone else having the same issue? 18:17:52 did all the ones up to 343699 18:18:09 maybe i did too many before hitting update? 18:18:15 idk 18:18:18 weird- they are all empty and should have atleast pulled in _something_ 18:18:29 I'm admittedly behind on looking at that 18:18:35 will spend some time on it this week 18:18:43 I think if you search different ways questions come and go. I'm not sure if anyone else has been working on the other then free one 18:19:23 nps is done 18:19:36 yeah - NPS and what do you like most look done? 18:19:37 whatdoyoulikemost has a small gap in the middle 18:19:49 mrhillsman: noted 18:19:51 furtherenhancement was going to have about the same gap in the middle 18:19:59 but then the ones at the top disappeared :( 18:20:16 i was hoping we could finish during the rest of our meeting time 18:20:17 hmmm - let me file a ticket with jimmy and his team 18:20:29 but maybe we should hold off ^ 18:20:30 my hope is that it is salvageable but want to make sure before being sure 18:21:03 one thing that would be helpful, beyond the data from it that we can pull, is there anything that stood out to folks? 18:21:07 i hope so too, it did hurt my heart a lil :) 18:21:13 hahah yeah - it's a lot 18:22:06 personally i think the quality of some of the responses may have suffered for a number of reasons 18:22:30 oh? 18:22:48 aprice - I know I haven't gone through all the pages, not sure if anyone else has though 18:22:58 i would have liked to see a bit more clarity on some of the inputs but i thought that if someone felt a bit overwhelmed i could understand them throwing something in there for the sake of finishing 18:23:22 just talking about the 3 questions 18:23:30 yeah - they've always been a little bit broken because people just throw things in there 18:23:36 i have not looked at any of the other data yet 18:23:54 i do like keeping it open ended, but getting quality feedback can be hard sometimes 18:24:01 there are usually a few good nuggets in there which is nice 18:24:29 def 18:24:49 at least a couple of them i was like man i would love to talk with this person more about their comment 18:25:13 mrhillsman: let's keep track of those numbers. that can happen 18:25:19 ++ 18:25:27 depending on if they put that they are OK with that of course. that is my preferred next step 18:25:39 maybe even using this standing time for the user calls since everyone has it blocked :) 18:25:40 understood 18:25:47 agreed 18:26:47 so if there is nothing else, i think taking time to add more tags should be good for the rest of the meeting? 18:26:59 there are not many left thankfully 18:27:14 +1 18:28:02 alrighty then 18:28:09 we are also working on using a translation service for the chinese since it's an overwhelming amount 18:28:28 hehe, yes 18:28:34 I can update folks when that's inputted in English 18:28:45 jumping into sangria now, but if anyone needs me, ping away 18:28:50 thx 18:28:51 same 18:28:55 #endmeeting