18:11:00 #startmeeting uc 18:11:01 Meeting started Mon Sep 24 18:11:00 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mrhillsman. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:11:02 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:11:04 The meeting name has been set to 'uc' 18:11:14 heheh 18:11:26 nothing like a good ol mention to set off an alert :) 18:11:30 #topic RollCall 18:11:34 wiki agenda says 7/30 and 8/6 FYI 18:11:38 o/ 18:11:43 o. 18:11:46 o/ 18:11:48 :) 18:11:50 o/ 18:12:14 i think josephrsandoval and VW_ are out for a bit but hope to make it before we are done 18:12:24 Dang VW we almost had everyone!! 18:12:40 back 18:12:56 #topic Housekeeping 18:13:41 so, i sent the email about moving things to https://governance.openstack.org/uc/ and setting the wiki page to "read-only" 18:13:52 anyone up to take on that task? 18:14:20 i think if we can have that done by end of next month that would be great; plenty of time :) 18:14:33 probably will not take that long 18:15:01 sure 18:15:17 so basically it is condensing the wiki page down to something very similar to - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/TechnicalCommittee 18:15:19 sound good 18:16:07 and pushing patches to update - https://governance.openstack.org/uc/ - via http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance-uc 18:16:19 does that mean both of you will work on it? 18:16:32 josephrsandoval and leong 18:17:23 i can... 18:17:32 #action josephrsandoval and leong to work on setting UC wiki to "read-only" and update governance.o.o/uc/ to replace it 18:17:44 cool 18:18:01 but i am wondering if i have the permission to chagne the UC wiki readonly.. 18:18:03 woot 18:18:12 i might need to check 18:18:20 well, not really read-only, that's why i used air quotes :) 18:18:48 i mean just removing stuff from it and making it primarily a pointer rather than something that changes a lot 18:19:05 Just put a link in the page to the new area 18:19:06 got it 18:19:08 any other housekeeping/general things? 18:20:12 Un Forum/Summit session submittal? 18:20:33 yes, we need to do that for sure 18:21:16 i pinged Ashlee to send a message to user groups / ambassadors in the area so hopefully that yields some sessions 18:21:41 if any of you have user/operators/developers in the area please encourage them to submit sessions 18:22:00 anything else? 18:22:09 sorry 18:22:15 I think the ops meetup group is trying to put something together. But I meant us:) 18:22:53 spotz on the session have any catchy title? 18:23:13 yeah, i understood that, apologies 18:23:17 We doing a meet and greet or what do we want to get out of it? 18:23:41 we could get a few things probably 18:24:21 i think we should def do the meet and greet 18:24:25 just always a good to have 18:24:37 So Get to know your USer Committee for one? 18:24:55 Users and OPerators of rthe World Unit?:) 18:25:12 is that consider a BoF? 18:25:51 i believe so 18:26:04 so we have one BoF 18:26:21 Yeah so each group can have a WG session and a BoF session, space is going quickly though 18:26:44 if so.. i believe we also need to reserve a space... 18:26:49 and we can/should have a work room 18:26:58 #link Berlin WG/BoF request: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qOFG0pnUQWCFbJW6esyliS4cxO4qYIsUuSpkx29B3aw/edit#gid=0 18:28:02 i just added a row there 18:28:14 but we need a BoF title and description 18:28:23 Just titles I thought 18:28:32 also included WG session for UC 18:29:07 #topic Berlin Summit 18:29:32 mrhillsman: changing the topic heading :p 18:29:50 Well it was kinda general topic:) 18:30:23 i just added something, we can change later i suppose :) 18:30:37 "User Committee Hangout with Users, Application Developers, and Operators" that looks to me more like a description :) 18:31:16 better? 18:31:27 +2 18:31:39 ok cool 18:31:47 anything else housekeeping/general related? 18:32:11 Nope 18:33:08 #topic User Survey 18:33:21 everyone have access to - https://www.openstack.org/sangria/ViewSurveyFreeAnswersList 18:33:24 ? 18:33:45 i don't 18:33:53 have access 18:34:29 aprice jamesmcarthur can either of you get josephrsandoval access to the survey results 18:35:01 yes - no problem 18:35:42 ty sir 18:35:54 He's magic:) 18:35:59 alright, so the netpromotor one is done thankfully 18:36:16 @josephrsandoval: you should be able to get in now 18:36:19 sorry about that 18:36:19 however the other two need attention - like trauma unit style 18:36:26 lol 18:36:31 what do you like most and further enhancement 18:36:54 is anyone not aware of what we are doing? 18:37:00 I started looking at the besides Open one but needed to get ready for grace hopper. I'll try to do some tagging tonight as I've started already 18:37:23 Yeah, so at a high level, the reason for the tagging is so that we can do advanced data analysis on the free-text answers. 18:38:04 i think if everyone spent at least one hour today we will be done honestly 18:38:14 yeah... it goes pretty fast once you get started 18:38:22 and we have 20 minutes left in the meeting that i would like to take advantage of 18:38:53 throw on some headphones for 15-20 minutes and tag as much as you can; of course quality over quantity :P 18:39:07 anything else for the meeting? 18:39:22 sorry for my late attendance. Lost track of time. I will catch up on the logs. 18:39:29 no problem 18:40:01 josephrsandoval: if you have trouble logging in, ping me directly :) 18:40:13 im in 18:40:13 ty 18:42:07 jamesmcarthur if two people tag the same question one after another and hit update, does the page reflect both tags, or a full page refresh is needed to see any updates from others 18:42:42 it should allow people to tag concurrently... 18:42:57 but it's probably worth a quick test to be sure 18:42:58 would be nice to have a "x is typing..." or some visible tip to that effect 18:43:02 Or should we assign folks sections? 18:43:03 uno momento 18:43:21 mrhillsman: ha ha! we do have a pretty small budget you know ;) 18:43:27 hehe 18:43:41 As much as I want to recreate Slack in our survey tagging :P 18:43:45 one sec - let me test 18:43:59 is there a common/agreed "tag" to use? for example: IT vs Information Technology vs Software Development 18:44:00 etc 18:44:24 leong i would say there is not 18:44:40 but jimmy would know 18:44:46 i generally look at what is already there real quick when i load the page 18:45:02 at the bottom left i always load all the questions :) 18:45:40 ok - yeah, you can do it concurrently 18:45:56 i thought that's how we set it up, but just double checked and tested 18:46:06 ok 18:46:11 leong: no, I do another round where I merge tags 18:46:17 So just use whatever makes sense to you 18:46:24 jamesmcarthur: noted 18:46:42 i got to switch network.. brb... 18:48:11 Thanks everyone for your help! 18:48:24 NP 18:49:21 started tagging 18:49:29 also leong the responses are great for finding common tags 18:49:36 like stability, reliability, etc 18:49:51 community 18:54:05 o/ (curiously I am not sleeping right now) 18:54:55 o/ 18:55:02 \o 18:55:19 we're just speed-tagging :) 18:55:30 wow :) 18:55:31 5 more minutes 18:55:38 high interval tagging hehe 18:56:18 jamesmcarthur, just a quick question - are there translators on answers for other many languages (e.g., China)? 18:56:43 hey ianychoi 18:57:11 spotz, hi :) 18:57:32 i can do the chinese one..:) 18:57:39 but not korean :-) 18:57:39 ianychoi: aprice and I are still working on that. 18:58:01 leong: ianychoi: the problem is the volume 18:58:27 ianychoi has graciously offered to do the Korean translation, but there are hundreds of answers to translate 18:58:35 i got to drop now.. will continue tagging tonight... 18:58:42 jamesmcarthur: let me know anything i can help 18:58:45 Sunny, who works at the Foundation is working on some of the Chinese trasnlation for us 18:58:50 thank you leong! 18:59:38 ianychoi: we have reached out to Frank re: some of this, but as we noted, it requires an NDA and isn't something we can post to Zanata 18:59:52 jamesmcarthur, haha yes too much responses.. but I will try to finish :) 19:00:36 #endmeeting