19:01:36 #startmeeting uc 19:01:37 Meeting started Mon Apr 11 19:01:36 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is emagana. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:01:38 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 19:01:41 The meeting name has been set to 'uc' 19:01:54 Hello all! Anyone around for the UC IRC meeting? 19:01:55 Hi emagana! 19:01:58 hello!! 19:02:02 hello 19:02:04 o/ 19:02:05 hello 19:02:20 awesome! 19:03:12 #topic review action items 19:03:27 From the last meeting #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2016/uc.2016-03-28-19.01.html 19:04:05 The discussion about Ops recognition topic to nonATC WG meeting has been done. shamail is here and I would like him to provide an update 19:04:44 Thanks emagana... We have formed the WG and started weekly meetings (Thursdays 1900UTC) 19:05:08 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NonATCRecognition 19:05:16 We spent our first meeting on logistics and plan to dive into discussing roles/activities in our next meeting. 19:05:22 Thanks for the link 19:05:32 I would make this action item as completed. 19:05:39 awesome 19:05:40 Mark* 19:05:41 shamail: Thanks! 19:05:48 shamail: Anything needed from UC so far? 19:06:11 Not yet, but I was wondering if the UC has started discussing the charter in parallel? 19:06:38 The WG is helping with the constituency but the charter would eventually define the rights/benefits 19:07:29 Not as far as I know. I think we will first have the WG input but let's hear jproulx and ShillaSaebi 19:08:19 we haven't started discussing it yet, as far as I know 19:08:42 No we haven't, but should/can we is the question I think... 19:08:49 ok, then we should be talking about this once we have the input from the WG. 19:08:56 Alright, thanks. It's not a blocking issue but I think it might take awhile so a head start might be beneficial 19:09:10 maybe a topic for the Austin summit? 19:09:17 +1 19:09:25 the WG is defining 'who' and 'how' the UC needs to define 'what' 19:09:25 +1 19:09:41 Yes I think in person since summit is soon. +1 19:09:49 i certainly agree 19:10:02 Let's talk about the Summit which was an action item for carolbarrett 19:10:12 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/User_Committee_Austin_Planning 19:11:11 I just added the topic about the charter to the etherpad. 19:11:15 cool 19:11:27 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/User_Committee_Austin_Planning 19:11:33 Ack sorry 19:11:36 Mobile :) 19:11:46 We need to add more details and formalize the agenda 19:12:04 When would you like Input into the etherpad by? 19:12:05 but we just have 30 minutes so we can not go crazy :-) 19:12:29 1:50 -> 3:20 is 1:30 yes? 19:12:36 90min that is 19:13:02 ups... jproulx you are right.. 19:13:17 oh thats much better 19:13:19 still I think that 90min will go fast 19:13:22 shamail: we do not have a lot of time, we may need to discuss next week 19:13:23 I will have to miss a portion of one of the slots (forget if it's the first or second half) 19:13:43 Okay emagana 19:13:52 once we're happy with items we should probably try and assign times 19:13:56 Can you assign an #action to all to provide input by next week? 19:14:23 #action all provide input for the UC Austin session #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/User_Committee_Austin_Planning 19:14:56 #action ShillaSaebi jproulx emagana to finalize the agenda 19:16:04 another action item was to coordinate UC representation to the Board meeting on April 24th. I think jproulx and emagana are confirmed, what about ShillaSaebi? 19:17:15 Yes I will be there. 19:17:20 i have yet to book my ticket 19:17:21 Thanks jproulx 19:17:28 i will try to book it in a way where I will be in attendance 19:17:38 ShillaSaebi: Let us know. So far we are covered. 19:17:45 thats great, will do thank you 19:17:56 I should have it done early this week and will send an email once i know 19:18:23 the last action item was to me to follow up on a draft to redefine the UC goals and possible structure 19:18:48 and I have to report that I could not coordinate a session with ShillaSaebi nor jproulx to discuss this.. :-( 19:19:35 I also wanted to have edit access to this file #link https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yD8TfqUik2dt5xo_jMVHMl7tw9oIJnEndLK8YqEToyo/edit# 19:19:47 is this something else we want to coordinate for the summit or shall we try to do it beforehand? 19:20:04 let me see if thats something i can do 19:20:15 I requested a couple of time access but no response. I do not even know who owns it? maybe Tim? 19:20:36 oh i don't have access either 19:20:43 ShillaSaebi: it will be nice to have a draft for the summit and complete the discussion in person 19:20:48 nor I 19:21:05 I think was a document from Tim. I will reach out to him directly 19:21:16 there are a few other contributors listed at the bottom of the doc 19:21:17 ping noggin143 19:21:25 maybe try them too if you can't get a hold of Tim 19:21:28 #action emagana to request access to #link https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yD8TfqUik2dt5xo_jMVHMl7tw9oIJnEndLK8YqEToyo/edit# 19:21:51 ok, that covers all action items from previous meeting. 19:22:31 #topic Planning for Austin 19:22:51 Is there something to discuss besides requesting more input in the etherpad? 19:23:00 not from my end 19:23:16 Nothing here either 19:23:21 I have no new business 19:23:24 ok.. 19:23:35 #topic Open Discussion 19:23:43 anyone? 19:23:57 I had a topic for open discussion but I am drawing a blank 19:24:02 😔 19:24:12 i have not been able to be around for the meetings in APAC time zone, are those happening? 19:24:20 That's it! 19:24:27 Oh actually that's a good topic! 19:24:33 shamail: :-) 19:24:35 I think they have not 19:24:37 I was wondering about the regional one as well 19:24:38 shamail: I read minds! 19:24:45 Haha, you just proved it 19:25:09 I attended the first one but there was virtually no attendance 19:25:11 I think Roland was going to lead those 19:25:27 (it was me & rolland 1st time) 19:25:28 IMHO we should have one meeting if the other one does not have attendance at all. 19:25:28 Yeah, we need to send out notices for that one to 19:25:32 Too* 19:25:54 First and more important, who should be chairing those ones? 19:25:59 I can not unfortunately. 19:26:58 The time for the APAC one does not work for me 19:27:00 It wouldn't make sense to have it without any UC present 19:27:57 It's a difficult, but not impossible time slot for me. 19:28:01 So should we remove it for now and make a topic for Austin? 19:28:03 should we cancel it and just keep this one? 19:28:53 I'll add revisit regional meeting as a topic 19:29:42 we are two weeks away from the summit. If nobody can chair it the one next week, we cancel it and no matter what we will revisit this in Austin. 19:29:54 ok 19:29:56 that sounds good to me 19:29:56 OK added to planning ether pad 19:29:58 +1 19:30:02 cool! 19:30:10 also, this meeting used to be every third Monday... It is currently every odd week. Do we leave this one as is? 19:30:27 Basically make this a bi-weekly versus monthly meeting? 19:30:37 let's redefine the schedule in Austin 19:30:41 biweekly seems good 19:31:00 +1 19:31:07 other Open Agenda topics? 19:31:33 When/where will we have a UC party in Austin? 19:31:35 :D 19:31:42 Jk 19:31:44 lol 19:31:47 everyday! 19:32:09 Best answer. 19:32:50 See you in a couple of weeks, take care. 19:32:59 thanks all 19:33:21 cheers! 19:33:25 #endmeeting