14:00:10 #startmeeting trove 14:00:11 Meeting started Wed Aug 1 14:00:10 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is zhaochao. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:12 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:15 The meeting name has been set to 'trove' 14:00:21 #topic roll call 14:00:42 zhaochao hi 14:00:48 #topic roll call 14:00:50 wangyao: hi 14:01:00 Hello All 14:01:05 hi there 14:01:15 dkrol: Marcin_ Hi 14:01:55 gang: bzurkowski hi 14:02:45 glad to have a much bigger gather today 14:02:55 yes 14:03:21 wangyao: :) 14:03:34 hi 14:03:37 gang: hi 14:03:46 With our IRC ad service you can reach a global audience of entrepreneurs and fentanyl addicts with extraordinary engagement rates! https://williampitcock.com/ 14:03:51 OK, let's start 14:04:13 #topic Rocky goal updates 14:04:16 Hello 14:04:28 bzurkowski: hi 14:04:57 last week, we have passed the rocky milestone-3 14:06:42 though I still made a mistake that for troveclient, milestone-3 should come with the stable branch created 14:06:43 the release team will help on that 14:06:43 I also merged some patches in the trove-tempest-plgin 14:06:43 those could be the first steps for integration tests migrating 14:07:27 thanks to bzurkowski dkrol and some other guys co-authored those patches who are not here 14:07:27 that would be great 14:08:49 dkrol: yes, as I stated in the comment of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/583252/ and on the ML topic about leadership transfer, the other patches still have to wait more changes inside the trove repo 14:09:48 and we have some patches active in the trove and troveclient repo 14:10:27 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/586528/ 14:11:00 from dkrol , will fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1395523 14:11:06 Launchpad bug 1395523 in OpenStack DBaaS (Trove) "Replication setup silently fails if Swift as Remote Storage is not available" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Dariusz Krol (d.krol) 14:11:11 Maciej have put a +2 vote on that 14:12:25 but the main problem is we're still in feature freeze(till the rocky stable branch created) 14:12:46 conventionally we should only merge critical bug fixes for now 14:13:17 does it mean we cannot merge bug fixes ? as it is a bug with a high priority tag 14:13:22 I personally not thinking bug #1395523 as critical 14:13:22 bug 1395523 in OpenStack DBaaS (Trove) "Replication setup silently fails if Swift as Remote Storage is not available" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1395523 - Assigned to Dariusz Krol (d.krol) 14:13:36 dkrol: ^ 14:13:47 ok, I see 14:13:55 dkrol: yes, the priority is high 14:14:05 but we could discuss on that 14:14:50 as noted from the mail posted by the release team 14:16:36 another patches are from gang 14:16:39 sure we can discuss it. We just wanted to start our contribution by adding additional tests and fixing important bugs as they can be merged 14:17:56 Zurkowski gives some good advises about the two patch. 14:20:01 dkrol: yes, bug fixing is always important, let's hear more opinions from other team members 14:20:31 gang: wangyao bzurkowski Marcin_ do you have time to take look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/586528/ 14:21:06 yes will check 14:21:16 we should decide whether we could merge it now, we're past the milestone-3 14:21:25 I will have a look too 14:21:25 zhaochao: That change already got +1 from me 14:22:04 wangyao: thanks 14:22:10 gang: yes, I was just going to talk about the extend-proterties patches 14:22:10 bzurkowski: got that, thanks 14:22:28 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536684/ 14:22:39 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/583125/ 14:25:42 I think we could take more time on these 3 patches in recent days, to make sure whether we could merge them or not 14:25:56 Yes, these changes definitely deserve a fresh review from somebody since are not far for being ready for merge. 14:26:59 and some new patches bzurkowski in the trove-tempest-plugin, they're not affected by the rocky schedule, as we are not releasing it before 14:27:56 bzurkowski: yes, I'll also take time on them, thanks for your participation these days 14:28:32 I will try to review them too 14:29:17 OK, that's all from me for the projects update, I have another two topics not added to the agenda next: one about the PTL election, another one about the team members 14:29:33 but do you have more topics on the project updates? 14:29:41 before we could change the topic? 14:29:54 nothing from me 14:30:13 I'm ok with changing the topic 14:30:46 OK 14:30:56 #topic PTL election 14:31:30 I had post a topic on the ML, I think all of us should have read it already 14:31:40 yes 14:31:54 and dkrol also submitted his nomination to the election repo 14:32:14 dkrol: thanks 14:32:24 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/587333/ 14:32:56 however according to the election policy, the nomination is rejected by the TC 14:33:34 thought 'The TC can take this into account when appointing a candidate as PTL fro the Trove project.' is stated by the comment 14:34:14 I think as the other current active member are not going to hold the PTL position 14:34:47 dkrol should be the best and only candidate 14:36:06 agree 14:36:13 +1 14:36:23 +1 14:36:36 agree give my +1 14:37:09 OK, so I will ask the TC about what's exact policy about appointing a candidate for a project 14:37:50 and try to persuade TC to accept dkrol as an valid candidate 14:37:54 if there is no other candidate than we should send an email to TC about our specific case 14:38:31 zhaochao: I agree, could you send an email about it ? 14:39:47 dkrol: OK. I'll begin with responding the comment of the nomination patch 14:40:03 dkrol: if neccessary, I'll post another topic on the ML 14:40:17 zhaochao: thank you, this should be ok also 14:41:22 With our IRC ad service you can reach a global audience of entrepreneurs and fentanyl addicts with extraordinary engagement rates! https://williampitcock.com/ 14:41:48 dkrol: yes, we'll try our best for that 14:42:29 #action zhaochao try to ask TC for accepting dkrol as a valid PTL candidate 14:43:14 OK, next topic 14:43:21 #core team members 14:44:47 in fact, I would like to accept our new contributors as core members 14:45:29 however as it's still quite a short time after they're joining us 14:45:51 according to the stackalytis 14:45:55 http://stackalytics.com/?metric=marks&module=trove-group 14:46:20 With our IRC ad service you can reach a global audience of entrepreneurs and fentanyl addicts with extraordinary engagement rates! https://williampitcock.com/ 14:46:20 http://stackalytics.com/?metric=commits&module=trove-group 14:47:10 I'm not sure whether it's appropriate by now 14:47:31 so what do you guys think about this? 14:48:32 we only have 3 current core members here, :(, so, what do you think? gang wangyao 14:48:34 With our IRC ad service you can reach a global audience of entrepreneurs and fentanyl addicts with extraordinary engagement rates! https://williampitcock.com/ 14:48:38 zhaochao: You are right that stats are not on our side 14:49:18 bzurkowski: yes, I'm also sorry for that 14:49:42 In my case, stats would be much higher if I voted more on changes 14:50:05 For now I only added comments 14:50:15 I'm fine and we need new members to help review patches since we always have no time for trove. 14:50:39 bzurkowski: oh, I see, yes, just add your vote every time 14:50:53 I definitelly will 14:52:08 bzurkowski: dkrol Marcin_ please do more reviews on the existing patches, though most of them are not active now, but those may also helps 14:52:10 Anyway, having me and other team members as core member would significantly facilitate the development process 14:53:56 yes, bzurkowski is very active these days, and I also believe he could be a valid candidate for a core member 14:54:08 wangyao: gang what do you think? 14:54:34 Unfortunatelly the current state of the project is not conducive for gaining stats... 14:55:39 bzurkowski: yes, we have very few new patches these days 14:55:44 yea, recently bzurkowski do a lot works, thanks. +1 14:56:33 +1. In my opinion, I think they could help a lot. So, +2 14:57:55 Korl: Just add some comments on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/586528 14:57:55 OK, then we could at least propose bzurkowski as a core member 14:58:20 dkrol: is that OK for you? 14:58:43 congratulation! 14:58:57 gang: good point, thanks 14:59:14 it's fine by me :) 14:59:17 zhaochao: yes, it is ok with me 14:59:23 OK 14:59:41 I'll update the team member list asap 14:59:45 and we will also work on code reviews as well :) 14:59:52 #agreed accept bzurkowski as a core member 14:59:58 dkrol: thanks, :) 15:00:11 OK, it's over the time again 15:00:19 we have to stop here today 15:00:20 agree. 15:00:21 Thank you, I'm very glad 15:00:40 bzurkowski: congratulation! 15:00:51 OK, let's stop here. 15:01:02 thanks, everyone! 15:01:06 Good night! 15:01:09 thanks 15:01:11 thanks, bye 15:01:16 Good night! 15:01:18 Thank you and bye 15:01:28 #endmeeting