14:00:14 #startmeeting trove 14:00:15 Meeting started Wed May 16 14:00:14 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is zhaochao. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:16 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:19 The meeting name has been set to 'trove' 14:00:28 #topic roll call 14:01:42 Courtesy ping anzhang kumarmn maciejjozefczyk songjian wangyao zhanggang 14:02:30 o/ 14:02:39 songjian1994: hi 14:02:44 hi 14:02:52 o/ 14:03:03 fanzhang: hi 14:03:57 looks like we should wait for a while 14:05:04 I did a courtesy ping, so maybe only we three are here today 14:05:42 let's start 14:06:03 #topic Rocky goal updates 14:06:20 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/trove-priorities-and-specs-tracking 14:07:05 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Jz6TnmRHnhbg6J_tSBXv-SvYIrG4NLh4nWejupxqdeg/edit 14:07:37 #link https://releases.openstack.org/rocky/schedule.html 14:07:53 some links for reminder 14:08:41 it seems next week will be the summit, and none of us will go for it 14:09:10 Yeah, so who will do the project updates? 14:10:19 and we only have 3 weeks for rocky milestone-2, we're progressing very slowly, however I'm sorry for not having much resource and time on Trove ... 14:10:38 fanzhang: maybe the project update for Trove will be cancelled 14:10:56 sounds a little sad :( 14:12:32 yes 14:12:36 I did not spend much time this week, looks like if we want to achieve the cycle goals, we have to hurry. 14:13:58 I guess this is it :( 14:14:45 I also didn't do much on Trove last week, yesterday I did a quick look through for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/567294/, songjian1994 , thanks fo woking on this, I think patchset v2 should be fine 14:14:55 I'll put my +1 vote later 14:15:20 fanzhang: we could just try our best 14:15:30 ok.I will review it tomorrow 14:18:38 songjian1994: thanks. I also noticed that mysql gate jobs are failing, I did some early investigation, will try to fix them later 14:20:06 Yes,I did some related investigations, but there is no solution from me and it seems that there seems to be some relationship with nova. 14:23:33 songjian1994: I first noticed the failures when I was doing the Zuul v3 migration (still wf-1 now, may don't have to update it recently...), after digging into serveral logs, I found the problem must be the new version of percona xtrabackup 14:23:43 songjian1994: but still have no time to verify that 14:25:05 ok.will continue to pay attention 14:25:42 songjian1994: thanks 14:25:44 and 14:26:33 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560373/ from wangyao , is still not passing gate checks, and not updated for a while 14:27:47 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/564103/ from zhangang is in a similar situation 14:28:02 they must also be busy at other things, :( 14:28:35 yeah, I heard about their heavy work 14:30:36 fanzhang: how is the file-inject bp progressing now? 14:31:23 modification of get_injected_file is done, but I have not uploaded it as a single patch. 14:31:50 Should I split them into small patches or ...? 14:34:30 fanzhang: split commits should be fine, small patches are always easier for review, or you could submit as WIP 14:35:50 ok, sure :) 14:37:39 fanzhang: :) if you think it's not ready yet, it's fine. And most of the core members don't have time for the project these days, :( 14:38:57 OK, these may be all from me today. 14:39:20 fanzhang: songjian1994 any other updates or other topics from you? 14:39:50 no more from me 14:41:00 zhaochao, no more updates from me. Recently someone asks me about using openstack/heat in trove. But found a patch of amrith to drop this support 14:41:05 any ideas ? 14:41:52 fanzhang: O, let's change the topic to open discussion first 14:42:09 #topic Open discussion 14:42:48 fanzhang: want to heat to create nova instance for Trove or manage Trove instance in heat? 14:43:50 create and manage I guess? 14:44:20 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385513/ 14:45:27 yes, I noticed the commit sometime before, but according the commit message, use heat to manage Trove instance should work 14:45:49 but I'm not familiar with heat and didn't verify that 14:46:55 neither do I. But considering the activities of trove lately, we may not have time to do some investigation about it. 14:47:22 I am wondering if songjian1994 knows something about it 14:49:34 yes, I agree. And I also think it's not appropriate to use heat to create nova instance for Trove too, but I did'n know much about this kind of user case 14:50:07 I have not used heat yet... 14:50:50 just a quick question :) 14:51:18 no need to pay much attention on it right now 14:51:19 in our company, using heat for choreography of the trove instance 14:51:34 But not knowing a lot 14:51:46 so you don't work on it? 14:52:47 but since your company does that, maybe it is worth something 14:52:48 Yes, just asked me some questions about creating parameters. 14:53:04 LOL 14:55:06 From this commit msg, we can see that we just use heat to create a trove instance, so this patch should have no effect on us 14:57:02 the related commit is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385529/ 14:57:02 We create an instance only by nova, have not tried heat 14:58:21 but no clear reason for heat removal, it seems the only reason is creating nova instances by heat is not widely used 14:59:57 OK, time is up. 15:00:05 let's end here. 15:00:15 thanks, fanzhang songjian1994 15:00:20 Goodnight 15:00:24 good night 15:00:38 #endmeeting