14:59:34 <kumarmn> #startmeeting trove
14:59:35 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jan 10 14:59:34 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kumarmn. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:59:37 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:59:40 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'trove'
15:00:21 <maciejjozefczyk> Hello
15:00:37 <songjian> o/
15:01:19 <kumarmn> #topic rollcall
15:01:21 <fanzhang> o/
15:01:36 <maciejjozefczyk> Aough. review.openstack.org is down
15:02:26 <kumarmn> Yikes, I had not checked this morning.
15:02:26 <fanzhang> Gerrit is being restarted...
15:04:36 <kumarmn> #topic release milestones
15:05:34 <kumarmn> This week is for recognizing Additional Technical Contributors, i.e. contributors who may not have committed any changes. Do you all know of any people like this for Trove?
15:07:06 <fanzhang> No, I just know few people and most of them are here. :)
15:07:19 <kumarmn> #topic queens-3
15:08:00 <kumarmn> The third milestone for queens is coming up. I missed tagging queens-2 because of the nova breakage. This time around I am likely to tag early.
15:08:17 <kumarmn> Do you all know of or working on major changes that I should wait for?
15:08:37 <kumarmn> If not, I will try and tag queens-3 sometime late next week.
15:09:08 <fanzhang> As far as I know, there is none. No big changes recently in trove.
15:09:29 <maciejjozefczyk> can't find any specific
15:10:03 <fanzhang> Things seem like just warming up after the holiday break...
15:10:06 <kumarmn> has anyone been in touch with feilongwang? Don't know when he is targeting his work?
15:10:42 <songjian> what about mysql 5.7?Need before this milestone or next?
15:10:50 <fanzhang> Recently he's working for zaqar, but the bp in trove, I am not sure. I will contact hime tomorrow I guess
15:11:12 <maciejjozefczyk> kumarmn: I tried to catch him today without success
15:11:38 <songjian> ok, I saw that it had merge
15:11:56 <fanzhang> LOL, when did you do that maciejjozefczyk, maybe the time zone issue..
15:12:47 <kumarmn> yes mysql 5.7 change merged yesterday. Any other currency items like that we should target?
15:12:51 <maciejjozefczyk> fanzhang: It seems that :D
15:13:08 <kumarmn> Postgres 9.6, couchbase 3.0, cassandra etc?
15:14:11 <songjian> maybe postgresql
15:16:08 <songjian> Users seem to be more looking forward to this
15:16:19 <Yao_> sorry for late
15:16:21 <kumarmn> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409524/ has a merge conflict
15:16:45 <kumarmn> Can someone pick this up? It looks like it was started by someone at Tesora.
15:17:44 <fanzhang> pool network...can not open the url right now
15:18:03 <fanzhang> oh yes, saw it
15:19:52 <songjian> I'll mark this patch first.I can help solve some of the code conflicts, but unfortunately there is no environment for me to test
15:20:41 <fanzhang> maybe solve the conflicts first?
15:21:36 <kumarmn> No problem. If someone picks it up and tries to get it to merge I will wait, otherwise I will tag next week.
15:21:55 <songjian> Yes, at least it can accelerate
15:22:55 <songjian> If tagging next week, I suggest that the subsequent version merge, recently busy with helm.Or someone can test it
15:25:24 <kumarmn> #topic stable_liaison
15:25:38 <fanzhang> I will see if I can build a PostgreSQL image to test it tomorrow. I have built a packstack env for dev and test. songjian
15:25:55 <kumarmn> I spoke to smatzek, who is unable to continue as the stable liaison.
15:25:57 <kumarmn> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CrossProjectLiaisons#Stable_Branch
15:26:00 <Yao_> I only have environment with mysql. I'm afraid can't offer help
15:26:23 <kumarmn> Can someone else volunteer?
15:26:58 <kumarmn> The odd thing as fanzhang noted, is that the stable liaison does not necessarily get +2 authority on the stable releases.
15:27:46 <kumarmn> The +2 authority is still with a small group.
15:28:04 <kumarmn> fanzhang: Thanks for picking up postgres
15:28:19 <songjian> thx,fanzhang,will stay tuned to that patch
15:28:45 <fanzhang> kumarmn: I'm going to build a image first. songjian you can work with the conflicts I guess ?
15:29:47 <kumarmn> We can chat again next week. I will not tag before next Wednesday. Either late next week, or early the week after.
15:29:56 <songjian> yes, I think it should not take too much time to slove conflicts
15:30:16 <fanzhang> cool, thanks.
15:30:30 <fanzhang> Is smatzek leaving trove ?
15:32:29 <kumarmn> He is not able to spend as much time as he was expecting to.
15:32:40 <fanzhang> I don't participate really long cycle, I am afraid I could not be as a stable liaison :(
15:33:57 <kumarmn> If no one picks it up, it will default to me.
15:33:59 <fanzhang> kumarmn: well, thanks for his excellent work in trove. wish him good luck at work.
15:34:28 <kumarmn> Thanks. will pass that on to him.
15:36:11 <kumarmn> #topic PTG
15:36:34 <kumarmn> Any update on plans to travel to PTG? As of now, I have not requested a room.
15:37:32 <fanzhang> not really……I guess remote meeting would work just fine. :)
15:37:40 <kumarmn> Most people preferred remote meetings. Perhaps we should find a channel which we can block off for a day or two that week.
15:38:23 <kumarmn> As it gets closer, we can figure out logistics. What day of the week, what topics to discuss, and where to conduct the remote meeting.
15:39:17 <fanzhang> Cool
15:39:45 <maciejjozefczyk> sounds ok
15:40:02 <songjian> agree
15:40:12 <maciejjozefczyk> kumarmn: Do we have a list of topics defined? Or place where we can place it?
15:42:34 <fanzhang> kumarmn: maciejjozefczyk just saw cinder's planning etherpad, we can have one either?
15:43:01 <kumarmn> Usually there is an etherpad. I can create one and then link it up when the other projects set theirs up.
15:43:51 <kumarmn> Don't know whether there was consensus on thierry
15:44:08 <kumarmn> 's proposal on rocky being a year long development cycle.
15:44:20 <kumarmn> Have not heard a firm answer on that yet.
15:44:58 <maciejjozefczyk> fanzhang: I vote for that
15:45:19 <kumarmn> If it is year long cycle, there should be more items in our etherpad.
15:45:33 <fanzhang> kumarmn: yep
15:46:23 <Yao_> agree
15:49:35 <fanzhang> I want to bring this commit into discussion. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511664/ The user guides look helpful, but since Yao_ and zhanggang are working on python-openstackclient, should we merge it? It's really something, I prefer to merge it. :)
15:49:35 <kumarmn> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/trove-ptg-rocky
15:49:52 <kumarmn> Please add items to the Etherpad for the discussions that week.
15:51:08 <fanzhang> Will do. Really efficient LOL
15:51:25 <Yao_> ok
15:52:45 <Yao_> I have add some comments on this patch. We really need the guides.
15:54:30 <songjian> We need these documents and some updates as well
15:55:10 <songjian> The update may work with openstackclient.
15:55:36 <Yao_> By the way, I hope someone can give some advice to me on this question. https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-troveclient/+bug/1741161
15:55:36 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1741161 in python-troveclient "Whether database/user operation support cluster or not" [Undecided,New]
15:56:09 <Yao_> thanks
15:58:36 <kumarmn> Sure Yao_ will look at it.
15:58:48 <kumarmn> Any other topics? We are almost at the end of the hour.
15:59:25 <songjian> Marked, will to see tomorrow. My impression is only on instance operation
15:59:45 <Yao_> thanks all
15:59:47 <songjian> I have nothing else here
15:59:49 <fanzhang> no more here. Thanks all
15:59:55 <kumarmn> #endmeeting