15:00:07 <johnma> #startmeeting trove
15:00:08 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jun 21 15:00:07 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is johnma. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:10 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:12 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'trove'
15:00:45 <trevormc> o/
15:00:56 <johnma> hi trevormc
15:03:39 <johnma> if we don't have any more folks join, we can cancel this meeting
15:03:45 <smatzek> o/
15:03:47 <trevormc> oh its just us?
15:03:57 <johnma> Hi Sam
15:04:06 <johnma> so far just the 3 of us
15:04:09 <trevormc> I think amrith had something on the agenda.
15:04:22 <johnma> amrith is travelling this week and the next
15:04:27 <smatzek> Manoj is in at a conference this week, likely won't be joining either.
15:04:30 <trevormc> oh well then :)
15:05:03 <johnma> the only thing I saw in the agenda was about the rearchitecture mail AMrith send out early this week
15:05:16 <smatzek> trevormc, I've finally gotten a nested trove VM/instance launch successful at the master level and am right now working on reproducing your secret=True failure.
15:06:08 <trevormc> smatzek, oh thats good news.
15:06:19 <trevormc> tbh I'm not too concerned with the patch.
15:06:20 <johnma> if 5 mins past the hour, I doubt we will have anymore attendees join. Is there anything you want to discuss. Otherwise we can have our time back
15:06:26 <trevormc> Its a class D hardening effort so..
15:06:36 <trevormc> umm 1 thing
15:06:45 <smatzek> nothing to dicuss project-wise.
15:07:16 <johnma> go ahead trevormc
15:07:23 <trevormc> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472275/
15:07:31 <smatzek> I agree the secret=True patch isn't that important but I'd like to understand why it causes that failure when it shouldn't, plus it gives me more hands-on experience debugging trove
15:07:39 <trevormc> if any of you aren't aware. It looks like we will be absorbing the openstack-manuals documentation intree
15:07:52 <trevormc> I was just wondering, do we want to discuss how to do that or just leave it up to me?
15:08:07 <trevormc> or maybe I should just work with the docs team on that..
15:08:23 <trevormc> you can see patches by keystone already being proposed
15:08:28 <trevormc> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/476162/
15:08:52 <trevormc> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/475119/
15:10:46 <johnma> so trevor , do you have an idea of the docs we have to change
15:11:09 <trevormc> the tree structure is the only thing that will need to change.
15:11:17 <trevormc> I'll propose something by the next meeting
15:11:36 <johnma> that sounds good.
15:11:42 <johnma> anything else?
15:12:18 <trevormc> also, config reference will need to be added and other manuals like so #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474543/
15:12:22 <trevormc> nothing else.
15:13:55 <johnma> sounds good trevormc. If you can come up with a rough outline of the changes you think we will have to make , that would be great. I would also recommend going ahead with a patch for this and we can always add review comments in there
15:14:15 <johnma> if that is all we have, then we can have 45 mins back
15:14:26 <trevormc> thanks for the feedback, sounds good!
15:14:30 <trevormc> 45 minutes woot!
15:15:11 <johnma> :) thanks trevormc and smatzek for joining. Have a good rest of the day
15:15:23 <johnma> #endmeeting