18:01:06 #startmeeting Trove 18:01:11 Meeting started Wed Feb 1 18:01:06 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is johnma. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:01:12 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:01:14 o/ 18:01:14 The meeting name has been set to 'trove' 18:01:28 Hello trevormc 18:03:41 hi johnma, is anyone else out there? I think its just us today. 18:03:47 is there anybody else from the Trove team? It might be a quick meeting. Looks like many folks are travelling this week including amrith, peterstac, 18:04:23 yeah might be the case, in which case this might be the shortest meeting :) 18:04:40 courtesy ping to : peterstac slicknik dougshelley66 pmalik vgnbkr mvandijk trevormc aliadil spilla songjian trevormc apsarshaik 18:05:45 trevormc: is there anything in particular you were looking to discuss in today's meeting 18:05:59 yes one thing 18:06:02 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/402780/ 18:06:04 I saw that one of the reviews you had for translations failed at the gate 18:06:10 Has failed gate verification three times 18:06:16 yes I saw that one 18:06:35 I'm hoping it is not caused by my patch but at this point I don't know anymore 18:07:11 There is a polling timeout error that has been consistent across the three failed verifications 18:07:22 the function wait_for_instance fails 18:07:45 I will try and see what I can find. There were some gate failures late last week that Amrith seemed to have fixed. 18:08:15 this week is RC1 deadline. Is this one marked a priority for rc1 18:08:31 anything else you have in the pipeline that requires reviews 18:08:58 ummm nothing too important. I added a work around to trove stack for a devstack bug related to cinder lvm 18:09:31 I just thought it would good to bring up in case other people are facing the same issue 18:09:33 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427467/ 18:09:48 I saw that one also. 18:10:20 other than that, nothing too important. 18:10:21 If there is a fix to the original devstack issue that you mentioned in the review comments, wont that fix our install problem as well 18:10:45 as opposed to adding another change in the trovestack layer 18:11:08 The original fix does not work, I have already tried it. 18:11:08 I am wondering whether to wait for the devstack fix, if that is where the problem is 18:11:13 It has two negative reviews as well 18:11:34 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/401265/ 18:11:40 yes thats true. But assuming they come up with the correct solution, isnt that the place where a fix should be made 18:11:54 t 18:12:02 yes that would be proper 18:13:29 right, which is what I was expecting. To me it looks like this is a devstack problem than a trovestack issue, so it needs to be fixed at that layer. In the mean time, those who are trying to use trovestack can use your fix as a workaround until the devstack issue gets resolved. Does that make sense? 18:13:49 yes that was my intention 18:14:09 sounds good. Thanks trevormc, appreciate that 18:14:29 so that change is not to be reviewed/merged, I would assume. 18:15:00 ehh take it or leave it, we can always add a comment saying remove this when the devstack bug is fixed 18:15:06 could you add a comment or edit the commit message to include that it is just a workaround and not to be merged. 18:15:28 yes I will 18:16:29 thanks trevormc. appreciate it. Anything else you would like to bring up? If you have any other patches you would like to get reviewed, just bring it up in our regular channel or ping me 18:16:47 no that is all, thanks 18:17:49 great, in that case, let's end the meeting. Anything else comes up, just ping me on IRC. You have a great rest of the day and thanks for joining. 18:18:01 #endmeeting