18:00:27 #startmeeting Trove 18:00:28 Meeting started Wed Aug 24 18:00:27 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is peterstac. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:29 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:00:30 ./ 18:00:31 The meeting name has been set to 'trove' 18:00:38 ./ 18:01:00 #agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TroveMeeting 18:01:35 Waiting a bit for people to join ... 18:02:41 amrith and johnma both are unavailable, so we don't need to wait for them ;) 18:03:46 o/ 18:04:08 ok, let's get started 18:04:27 There's not too much on the agenda so it may be a short meeting 18:05:19 😂/ 18:05:27 #topic Action items from last week's meeting 18:05:45 First one: peterstac to review py35 failure 18:06:04 I pushed up a changereq that should get the py35 tests to pass 18:06:13 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/359446/ 18:07:00 Turns out the tests were running the same command as the py27 tests (i.e. fake tests & generate_samples) 18:07:14 and these don't seem to work yet in python3 18:07:35 so for now I think we'll just have them run the same set as the py34 tests 18:08:28 I don't expect there to be too many comments on that - if so you can make them on the changereq :) 18:08:43 Next: pmalik to work with infra to see if we can get different machines for gate 18:08:56 pmalik_, floor is yours 18:10:29 The current non-voting jobs seem to be ok. We will need to run check experimental first to see how we stand with resources. 18:11:14 so hold off on talking with infra right now? 18:11:56 I think we should first try to make the new non-voting jobs passing. :/ 18:12:40 Yeah, I would say let's go to infra once we have concrete results (failures) in hand... 18:12:41 ok, so once they pass we can evaluate again if we need more resources 18:12:55 pass or fail :) 18:13:09 ok, sounds good 18:14:00 #action get new non-voting jobs to pass 18:14:18 Next: amrith and peterstac to ping infra re: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354881 18:14:33 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354881 18:14:59 That patchset merged this morning so we can now see the results for quite a few different datastores 18:15:44 mariadb, pxc and postgresql now run in the check (you'll need to run 'check experimental' to see the others) 18:16:10 Next: johnma to push infra change to enable tempest plugin install ... 18:16:23 She's not here, but the changereq is up 18:16:35 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356999/ 18:16:51 If people could review that, it'd be great 18:17:14 #topic Trove pulse update 18:17:29 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vJxNaoR3VVNS1Cpiz7U--1zyJRZ6ybMxzJoayrjdduo/edit?pref=2&pli=1#gid=1104331956 18:17:38 #link https://gist.github.com/anonymous/ac2e4a74aa53bc2b56719988d01e232d 18:18:45 looks like the stats are similar to last week 18:18:54 we could probably use some improvement there 18:19:21 and moving on ... 18:19:25 #topic Newton release schedule 18:19:39 #link https://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html 18:19:58 any questions about the release schedule? 18:21:26 aliadil, dloi are there any dashboard pieces that need to get in this week? 18:21:45 (we have client and horizon freezes coming due this week) 18:22:22 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/286159/ 18:23:09 ok, maybe we can get some eyes on that? 18:24:16 * peterstac looks around to see if anyone's awake ;) 18:24:41 moving on then 18:24:44 #topic Client reviews that need to be merged 18:24:54 We also have client freeze coming up 18:25:20 There are 6 reviews that I'd like to merge by end-of-day today, if there are no objections 18:25:29 (see the agenda) 18:25:57 most already have 2 +2's 18:26:20 There's one more though that might warrant a bit of discussion 18:26:34 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/329160/ 18:26:40 Implement scheduled backups 18:27:12 There seemed to be an issue with credentials when Mistral kicked off the backup 18:27:33 I tried running the mistral commands through their client and got the same results 18:27:54 so it almost looks as if there's a mistral bug 18:28:27 so the question is: do we merge the client piece and hope mistral fixes their end, or do we wait? 18:28:42 vgnbkr, do you have any opinion? 18:29:32 It worked for me when I did it, but that was a long time ago. I'm looking into it now to see if I can reproduce your issue. 18:30:22 ok, maybe we'll follow that on the changereq then - we'll have to decide soon if we want it to ship in Newton though 18:31:02 any other people want to chime in? 18:31:27 Regarding backup mistral workflow 18:31:30 ok, moving on then 18:31:41 oops, go ahead shaikapsar 18:32:19 We are seeing authentication issue when we add workflow as cron job 18:32:51 We have bug for that and we are working on it 18:33:07 yeah, that's the same issue I saw (and reported on the changereq for trove sched backups) 18:33:16 so is that a mistral issue? 18:33:22 Yes 18:33:46 Let me share the bug id 18:34:04 ok, maybe going with option 'a' is ok then (merging the trove code and hoping that mistral gets fixed in time) 18:34:07 sure 18:35:18 bug/1607788 18:35:31 On mistral project 18:36:20 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1607788 18:36:20 Launchpad bug 1607788 in Mistral "Cron Trigger failed to get openstack service authenticaton" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Bhaskar Duvvuri (bhaskar-duvvuri) 18:37:11 any time frame on a potential fix? 18:37:20 https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1607788 18:37:20 Launchpad bug 1607788 in Mistral "Cron Trigger failed to get openstack service authenticaton" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Bhaskar Duvvuri (bhaskar-duvvuri) 18:37:32 It will fail for all the openstack client api calls 18:37:53 I will check with mistral team on that 18:38:15 ok thanks 18:38:40 #action ApsarShaik to follow up with mistral on bug/1607788 18:38:53 moving on then 18:39:02 #topic Other reviews that look to be ready to merge 18:39:33 There are a few reviews that I'd like to see merged by the end of the week 18:39:35 please review the change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/340022/ 18:40:29 ApsarShaik, is that part of the mistral fix? 18:41:09 peterstac: No, It's trove related patch for "Client' object has no attribute 'tenants" 18:41:48 ah yes, I seem to recall this from last week 18:42:21 I'll see if I can get around to testing it this week 18:42:38 peterstac: thanks 18:42:41 np 18:43:04 As for the ones on the agenda, most of them are fairly simple fixes that should be easy to review 18:44:09 #topic Open Discussion 18:44:20 anything else people would like to discuss? 18:45:29 The only thing I've got is that our feature freeze is next week so we'll have to move on that quickly once the client changes merge 18:46:18 I'll create an agenda item for next week's meeting where people can list the reviews that they think should still make it into Newton 18:46:36 (for example the server code for all the client changes :) ) 18:46:54 anything else? 18:47:13 going once ... 18:47:25 going twice ... 18:47:33 Thanks everyone! 18:47:37 #endmeeting