18:00:38 #startmeeting trove 18:00:39 Meeting started Wed Mar 2 18:00:38 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is amrith. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:40 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:00:43 The meeting name has been set to 'trove' 18:00:54 o 18:01:02 ./ 18:01:12 lets give folks a couple of minutes to trickle in 18:01:19 Hello 18:01:21 ./ 18:01:23 hi 18:03:42 hi atomic77 johnma mvandijk tosky 18:04:09 o/ 18:04:10 o/ 18:04:14 o/ 18:04:28 hello dougshelley66 tellesnobrega schang 18:05:04 let's get going ... 18:05:22 #topic Trove pulse update 18:05:33 #link http://bit.ly/1VQyg00 18:05:46 thanks to dougshelley66 for getting this updated 18:05:59 np, i'm an excel hack from way back 18:06:11 we've seen a couple fewer reviews but also not many new patches as we head towards m-3 18:06:26 on the whole, we have a number of features that we should be trying to get merged in the next couple of days 18:06:35 so let's see if we can hit that target. 18:06:44 otherwise, not much unexpected on this list 18:07:00 o/ 18:07:13 o/ 18:07:21 any other thoughts on the review in the past couple of weeks, we didn't have an updated sheet last week. 18:07:24 hi vgnbkr pmackinn 18:07:46 #topic Announcements 18:08:15 #link http://releases.openstack.org/mitaka/schedule.html 18:08:19 I should really update the agenda 18:08:24 I keep getting the wrong link 18:09:15 we are almost at R-5 18:09:19 the Mitaka-3 milestone 18:09:26 this is the feature freeze date 18:09:42 all client libraries are to be frozen by March 4th 18:10:16 Looking at our current list of reviews 18:10:23 I see some that are for features 18:10:30 and some that are for libraries that we need to get merged 18:11:11 yes 18:11:17 Does anyone have a merge for trove client that MUST get merged for Mitaka? 18:11:30 peterstac, what about https://review.openstack.org/283283 18:11:59 that's the only client change that I can see a question about 18:12:14 we have several features that we need to get reviewed 18:12:22 CouchDB B&$ 18:12:26 B&R 18:12:32 CouchDB Configuration Groups 18:12:35 MariaDB Clustering 18:12:39 DB2 B&R 18:12:51 Cassandra clustering 18:13:00 there are 2 vertica featuers 18:13:25 do these features need to be merged by the 4th as well? 18:13:37 that is the preferred route 18:13:47 otherwise we need feature freeze exceptions 18:13:50 for each 18:13:51 for those that are not merged by 4th, I need to send out requests for FFE 18:13:56 one for each FFE 18:14:05 so, that's one of the later items on the agenda 18:14:09 bt we may as well get there 18:14:17 what is the list of things that we'll need FFE's for. 18:14:17 ok, sounds good. 18:14:49 I don't know what the formal process is but in years past, SlickNik or hub_cap would have sent out the FFE email. 18:15:03 So, I'll work with cp16net and make sure that the email goes out 18:15:13 but the current situation is that we will need FFE's for all of these. 18:15:19 any chance we can get some of them merged to cut down the red-tape? 18:15:25 dougshelley66, did module stuff from peterstac get merged? 18:15:33 Yes, I would like to get them done before 4th 18:15:44 amrith just one of the client pieces 18:15:45 could everyone please focus review effort on these chnanges. 18:15:50 So Amrith, I did one last year and the person working on the feature needs to request for FFE 18:16:02 ok johnma thanks 18:16:26 so johnma ... We need a review for 284526 18:16:32 https://review.openstack.org/284526 18:16:32 The two pgsql features as well 18:16:36 amrith, no, the module client stuff hasn't merged yet 18:16:41 it is the client side of the module management stuff 18:16:46 the server side has merged 18:16:52 and it would be good to get this merged 18:17:07 sorry 18:17:10 other way around 18:17:13 this is the server side 18:17:15 peterstac one of the module mgmt client patches merged, right? 18:17:15 the client merged. 18:17:27 amrith, sorry, that's correct, but there is another part that's still forthcoming 18:17:32 yes, one of the module management patches merged. 18:17:43 peterstac, please get it up for review 18:17:46 (by correct I mean that the troveclient stuff has merged) 18:17:53 it'll be hard to make the case for an FFE when the patch isn't in review. 18:18:02 amrith, yes, I'm hoping to have that today or early tomorrow 18:18:18 johnma, will you take care of requesting FFE's for your DB2 and CouchDB changes? 18:18:25 ok Amrith, I will look into these. So atomic77 can you send me the links for the ones you want reviewed as well 18:18:47 for CouchDB Backup & restore, I put out another patch to fix the user backup. So both user and db backup's work now. just need some reviews. I added a new couchdb library for the integration tests and had to add that to the global-requirements. That's why Jenkins is showing -1. I have a +2 on that from dims but waiting for it to be approved. 18:19:08 for the remaining ones on our side that needs FFE, I will handle that 18:19:49 amrith https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259167/ - pgsql inc B&R 18:19:56 I am hoping the Couchdb backup restore should go in without much problem before the FF date. I will see if I can get the requirements change approved 18:20:18 thanks johnma 18:20:43 but it's stuck in a merge conflict that i haven't been able to figure out (due to the in-flight dependencies i had to commit on top of) 18:20:55 in terms of priority, cassandra, mariaDB and vertica may be ahead of the list than the pgsql 18:21:03 given that pgsql is in merge conflict. 18:21:31 so, let's try and get cassandra, mariaDB and vertica merged and get FFE's for the minimal stuff (pgsql) 18:22:00 and peterstac will push up the last of the module management changes 18:22:07 which we can try to merge or FFE if not. 18:22:12 does that sound like a plan? 18:22:22 sounds good 18:22:26 MariaDB Clustering is patiently waiting for a second +2... 18:22:36 vgnbkr, I know ... 18:22:46 will look at it vgnbkr 18:23:00 anyone else have features that must go in before FFE? 18:23:20 I think I've gone through the list. 18:23:32 but would like to make sure I haven't missed something 18:23:54 vgnbkr, johnma: I've tested the MariaDB cluster stuff (worked fine) - just haven't had the time to check the code ... 18:24:16 thats great peterstac, i will go through the code 18:24:33 ok, that's all we have on that subject. 18:24:36 I have been having trouble with my env building images, so if testing is good, I can look at the code 18:24:57 johnma, we can catch up on #openstack-trove on the issue with images 18:25:05 I had some email exchanges with someone on the ML 18:25:06 sure 18:25:12 and will be updating the doc on making images 18:25:22 that talks about setting a bunch of env variables 18:25:31 but doesn't tell you what to set them to 18:25:56 anyway, on the subject of FFE, mitaka-3 deadline, ... anything else? 18:25:58 going once 18:26:02 sound good, thanks Amrith 18:26:14 going once more 18:26:48 #topic Health check on outstanding blueprints and features for Mitaka 18:26:57 #link https://launchpad.net/trove/+milestone/mitaka-3 18:27:18 dougshelley66, and I updated many of the bp's yesterday so they should reflect the current status of the various projects. 18:27:38 if you look below, there is also a list of bugs that are targeted for m-3 18:27:48 if you have a bug assigned to you, please take a look at it 18:27:57 if you can get it fixed, that's ideal 18:28:01 if not, we still have time 18:28:03 amrith we can fix bugs after FF, right? 18:28:10 M-3 is NOT the deadline for bug fixes 18:28:15 right 18:28:19 bug fixes can be committeed all the way through 18:28:29 but these bugs were targeted at M-3 earlier 18:28:46 But, we don't have a lot more time 18:28:47 like 10 days 18:28:56 in theory, you should have all bugs done by RC1 date. 18:29:09 in practice, sometime before April 4 (R0) 18:29:19 so something between 10 and 28 days. 18:29:54 That's all I have on that topic. anyone have anything else on it ... 18:30:13 #topic Open Discussion 18:30:26 anybody have any other topics or subjects they'd like to discuss. 18:30:47 * pmackinn stumps for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/284162/2 it's fedora...what could go wrong? 18:30:56 amrith sorry can i just get clarification - when you say pgsql minimal stuff 18:31:14 you don't mean the features i listed right - we're going to push those to n-release? 18:31:24 once the FFE sets in, when is the next deadline to get the features in (assuming they are accepted for FFE) 18:31:36 atomic77, I was meaning that we should try and get as many things as possible merged before the deadline 18:31:41 pmackinn, I'll take a look 18:31:43 and ask for FFE's for as few things as possible 18:31:50 "minimal stuff" was not very clear. 18:31:53 peterstac, you're a prince 18:32:02 I meant "as few FFE's as possible, get them merged before deadline" 18:32:18 pmackinn, I will take a look 18:32:34 amrith, ty 18:32:37 So I can test this, may I have a fedora (that is a RedHat, right?) 18:32:57 * pmackinn facepalms 18:33:04 o/ SlickNik 18:33:39 other topics for open discussion 18:33:57 o/ sorry arriving late 18:34:36 * amrith mumbles ... all it takes is pmackinn to say SlickNik and he shows up, what about the times I said SlickNik? 18:34:50 hi SlickNik 18:34:54 You have to say it 3 times. 18:35:09 hi hi 18:35:12 * amrith rubs the lamp and says SlickNik three times 18:35:29 FFE discussion earlier SlickNik 18:35:40 other subjects for Open Discussion 18:35:50 well, since SlickNik is here, ... 18:36:05 * SlickNik reads scrollback 18:37:23 amrith, how do you characterize m-3 bugs? High *must* go in? 18:37:45 pmackinn, I didn't mark those 18:37:47 So the process that teams have followed in the past has been that the person who's requesting the FFE sends a mail out to the -dev mailing list. 18:38:10 It is a combination of some that I felt should go in, and maybe some triaging that SlickNik and cp16net did 18:38:47 amrith, ack, was wondering generally how those are interpreted 18:38:52 FYI all, I believe that our current list of reviews for m-3 is https://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:watched+is:open+starredby:amrith 18:38:54 And then the PTL (after discussion with the release team) can grant FFEs as appropriate. 18:39:21 thanks SlickNik, johnma indicated that she had sent email in a previous cycle. 18:40:03 and to that list, add the change set that peterstac will submit 18:40:10 that's all I had for the meeting 18:40:15 thats a pretty clean list amrith :). 18:40:23 unless someone else has something else to add, I think we can call this a wrap 18:40:29 amrith ++ to that list 18:40:47 and if you find something missing on the list, please let me know and I'll star it 18:41:03 that list is empty 18:41:38 johnma, do you mean that the URL I sent is empty? 18:41:45 indeed 18:41:49 huh 18:41:53 yes, 18:42:08 how about this 18:42:08 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/starredby:amrith 18:42:24 johnma: you may need to sign in 18:42:31 very realistic now :) 18:42:34 oh, yes 18:42:40 have to login 18:42:59 works now 18:43:22 ok, going once ... 18:43:28 amrith there are 3 other patch sets for module mgmt 18:43:29 in review 18:43:36 dougshelley66, what are they? 18:43:39 or it might be 2 18:43:41 one sec 18:43:58 https://review.openstack.org/284526 18:44:05 added that just now 18:44:37 sorry it is just one ATM 18:44:38 amrith, you were asking earlier about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/283283/ 18:44:59 is that m-3 as well peterstac 18:45:02 I've starred it 18:45:06 that's a troveclient change that should probably make it in as well (guestlog swift client fix) 18:45:17 OK, list updated 18:45:19 yeah, I think it should be 18:45:33 OK all: this is the review focus list https://review.openstack.org/#/q/starredby:amrith 18:45:34 (I forgot to put in a bug for it, my bad) 18:45:40 as things come up, I'll update this list 18:45:48 so if we can use that list to drive reviews for now 18:45:54 I think we'll make forward progress quickly 18:47:25 ok, if you find other shortcomings with the list, please IRC me 18:47:30 #openstack-trove or PM 18:47:35 I'll keep the list up to date 18:47:38 that's all we've got 18:47:44 ok to wrap up this meeting? 18:47:46 going once ... 18:48:05 going once more 18:48:32 thanks folks 18:48:33 #endmeeting