18:00:08 #startmeeting trove 18:00:09 Meeting started Wed Oct 21 18:00:08 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is cp16net. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:10 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:00:12 The meeting name has been set to 'trove' 18:00:30 #topic roll call 18:00:50 howdy everyone 18:01:17 * cp16net looks around the empty room 18:01:24 o/ 18:01:54 hello imandhan 18:02:10 ./ 18:02:16 o/ 18:02:36 o/ 18:02:45 \o 18:03:41 giving folks a moment 18:04:48 ~o~ 18:05:28 #topic trove pulse update 18:05:32 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/trove-pulse-update 18:05:48 #link http://bit.ly/1VQyg00 18:05:50 o/ 18:06:40 looks like we are picking a little steam up on the reviews before it will likey fall for the summit 18:07:23 any comments questions? 18:08:05 alright then... moving on 18:08:15 #topic Mitaka Summit Sessions 18:08:45 i updated the descriptions on the sched with the suggested topics people posted 18:09:09 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-trove-summit 18:09:29 i moved around the topics to arragne them on this page 18:09:46 and created etherpads for each of them we can use during the sessiosn 18:10:04 #link http://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/trove 18:10:24 cp16net, sweet! thanks 18:10:32 i also updated the wiki page that all the projects are using to list their sessions https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Mitaka/Etherpads#Trove 18:11:07 cp16net, I proposed this one, so sounds like I should lead it... http://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/event/ba243d97a92e022fbbe2502f99cced77#.VifVKXUVhBc 18:11:12 but I have a presentation at the same day/time 18:11:32 (just wanted to let you know) 18:11:47 if someone else can lead it, then I'd appreciate some updates later 18:12:54 we could swap it on wed 440pm so that you could be there 18:13:21 its the currently that is the toggle status session 18:13:39 if that works for everybody, sounds good to me 18:13:46 any objections? 18:14:31 sounds fine 18:14:39 #action cp16net swap toggle status sessions with trove upgrades session times 18:15:03 sounds good then 18:15:46 can we get a volunteer for the toggle status? 18:15:47 vkmc, arent you also doing some other trove presentations i.e. in the conference? 18:15:56 how about peterstac 18:16:03 i think edmondk posted it 18:16:04 I would like to volunteer peterstac 18:16:28 dougshelley66, ++ 18:16:30 I've already added some info on the detailed wiki page about it 18:16:45 ok great thanks peterstac 18:16:48 yes, I read the stuff that peterstac posted hence the recommenation. 18:16:54 recommendation 18:16:56 thx 18:17:07 amrith, no... we didn't get accepted the image creation one we proposed with abramley :( 18:17:07 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/trove-mitaka-toggle-instance-status 18:17:26 There's a spec up, plus the implementation 18:17:39 cool 18:17:48 cp16net, one thing 18:18:00 the code that is posted for this is much more stable than our current code base. 18:18:16 see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/234462/3 18:18:27 the number of times it has consecutively passed rechecks makes my head spin 18:18:39 I'd like to get this stuff reviewed and merged quickly if possible 18:18:44 so that others can get the benefit of the code 18:18:45 ok sounds good need to look at that 18:18:58 yes, I'd like to raise the visibility of this 18:19:08 and maybe do the same thing we did in the mid-cycle 18:19:18 of having it merged while we're all in Tokyo (if not sooner). 18:19:29 ok so looks like at least one other sessions here we have 18:19:32 Make Trove distribution agnostic 18:19:39 volunteer for that one? 18:19:48 i do not recall who added it 18:19:53 is that vkmc ? 18:20:06 i was thinking vkmc or pmackinn 18:20:33 I added that 18:20:37 in any case i can get the party started if needed 18:20:43 I LOVE THAT IDEA! 18:21:00 pmackinn: :) 18:21:10 * amrith mumbles ... mention the word party and pmackinn wakes up 18:21:53 cp16net, vkmc: more specifically, better resilience to distro/vendor variants 18:22:24 alright i'll help lead this one then 18:22:26 pmackinn++ 18:22:48 I can help of course 18:23:15 it would be good to get some more idea about what we intend to talk about before summit 18:23:20 so we can all ponder it. 18:23:23 in advance 18:23:36 ok so i started listing a bunch of other topics at the bottom that could potentially have their own sessions but we only have 4 working sessions 18:24:19 can we get more sessions? 18:24:28 can we hangout someplace and hold sessions? 18:24:48 or is that frowned upon? 18:25:13 we can and i think thats part of the time they allow for the contributors meetup 18:25:40 isn't the audience potentially different? 18:26:20 it could be but its more of a focus time for the team 18:26:43 I would also like to draw everyones attention to this (these) sessions 18:26:46 that we should consider attending 18:26:47 http://sched.co/4QbI 18:27:20 ok, at least that one 18:27:28 we could potentially find a room for extra time if needed 18:28:13 yeah that would be a good session be at 18:28:22 thanks for mentioning that amrith 18:29:16 amrith, +1 18:29:35 once we are all there i'm sure we will be talking trove the ENTIRE TIME :-P 18:30:16 alright any other comments regarding the sessions/summit? 18:30:29 over artisanal beers served by HP 18:32:08 #topic no meeting next week (oct 28th) 18:32:16 just fyi 18:32:42 #topic open discussion 18:32:57 ./ 18:33:06 go ahead amrith 18:33:12 thanks ... 18:33:26 notwithstanding the pulse update earlier in the meeting 18:33:35 I have to notice an uptick in the number of outstanding reviews 18:33:40 we seem to have some new contributors 18:33:43 who are submitting stuff 18:33:52 and I'd like to get their stuff quickly considered and reviewed. 18:33:59 so we don't loose the enthusiasm 18:34:12 I also have a number of changes (of my own) that have actually passed the gate 18:34:25 and I notice that they've got no reviewer-attention 18:34:56 So, given that we're all going to be in Tokyo next week, could we have a conversation about how we can channel our energeies and get reviews done sooner 18:35:03 we started this conversation at the mid-cycle 18:35:08 and I'd like to continue it 18:35:20 and track the improvement in terms of reducing the # outstanding reviews. 18:35:24 that's all I got ... 18:35:50 yeah i think we continue to see the open reviews tick up 18:36:28 cp16net, I know that the flaky dsvm is a contributing factor and I'm trying to work on that 18:36:43 but at the end of the day, we need active reviewers 18:36:59 like (to beat the drum again) the stuff that peterstac pushed up 18:37:04 or the int-test framework 18:37:08 those are going to benefit us all 18:37:09 yeah i think this is something that we could address and look at as a team 18:37:15 we need to aggressively push those forward. 18:37:43 thx cp16net 18:37:53 thank you amrith for pointing this out 18:38:43 anything else from anyone? 18:39:19 . 18:39:35 . 18:39:44 alright thanks for everyone 18:39:51 see y'all in tokyo! 18:39:52 see you all in tokyo 18:40:02 #endmeeting