18:00:25 #startmeeting trove 18:00:26 Meeting started Wed Oct 7 18:00:25 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is cp16net. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:28 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:00:30 o/ 18:00:30 The meeting name has been set to 'trove' 18:00:38 o/ 18:00:39 hello everyone 18:00:45 o/ 18:01:03 o/ 18:01:10 o/ 18:01:49 o/ 18:01:53 o/ 18:01:59 give a min for others 18:02:04 o/ 18:02:09 o/ 18:02:31 ./ 18:03:09 #topic Trove pulse update 18:03:13 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/trove-pulse-update 18:03:20 o/ 18:03:54 peterstac: did you build that graph for these metrics in google docs? 18:04:09 no, I used excel 18:04:14 ok 18:04:23 o/ 18:04:30 ah .. a mac running ubuntu in a VM, running excel on Vine 18:04:32 technology! 18:04:33 I could redo it pretty easily in google docs though 18:04:37 i was thinking about making something i could update to link here for this 18:05:00 i think it would be helpful 18:05:24 peterstac: lets work together to get something setup 18:05:31 cp16net, sounds good 18:05:45 not sure if everyone will be able to view it but we'll figure something out 18:05:56 because looking at the metrics makes me miss that graph :-P 18:06:15 looks like a little more drop off this week 18:06:31 everyone must be busy with new feature work :-P 18:06:47 yup, that's it! 18:06:54 and getting ready for the summit 18:07:01 o/ 18:07:39 any other comments or questions on this? 18:08:11 mat-lowery: you there? 18:08:19 cp16net: present 18:08:28 #topic Trove community and containers [mlowery] 18:08:49 This has the potential for a long discussion so please cut me off when necessary. 18:08:54 As Docker and Kubernetes gain in popularity, I'm seeing problems they can solve in Trove. I wanted to know if either of these technologies (or similar ones) are candidates for adoption in Trove. I have only a superficial familiarity with both--this is just a very high level direction of Trove question. 18:09:36 As a concrete example of container adoption, consider the guest agent. When we upgrade our trove-guestagents, we have to care about the starting point of the upgrade (e.g. what libs are installed) and frankly, that drifts over time. (Some guests missed the last upgrade or we simply forgot to test some really old image.) In contrast, containers have everything they need to run. 18:10:47 i know theres a containers project that is working on bringing containers to openstack 18:10:58 see magnum 18:11:11 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Magnum 18:11:11 yeah thats the name 18:11:46 I've done some work on this. I have trove running against nova-docker which is great, not much change but not a very stable setup. 18:11:46 Moving forward, I think this container conversation is a bigger conversation that we should look into for a couple of reasons, the ones that Matt suggests for starters, but there are others. 18:12:25 would it be possible to discuss this in a design session in Mitaka? seems really interesting 18:12:39 great idea vkmc 18:12:57 yeah i think this brings up some interesting things 18:12:59 I'm personally interested about the upgrades management 18:13:10 mat-lowery: will you be in tokyo? 18:13:20 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-trove-summit 18:13:24 cp16net: I will not be in Tokyo. 18:13:37 * amrith volunteers to drive 18:13:59 ok we should definately talk about this there and get the conversation started 18:14:47 I'll add some bullets to the etherpad you linked to. Is there any remote participation? Not sure what crazy hour it will be in the US. 18:15:07 i'm not sure 18:15:15 its like 12 hours difference from where I'm based 18:15:16 in the past it has been hard 18:15:16 mat-lowery, yeah, linking in live wouldn't be fun 18:15:19 historically remote participation has been by etherapd 18:15:23 so US is probably similar... depending on which coast you are 18:15:25 given the numberof people and the bandwidth into the facility 18:15:45 yeah conf bandwidth has been bad in the past 18:15:50 so if we have it very early, it could be possible 18:16:23 if it is very very early, most people will have 'sake' breath ;) they'll be discussing a different kind of container. 18:16:29 i'll see if there are any plans for streaming sessions 18:16:31 mat-lowery, are you a contributor for Magnum? 18:16:38 amrith++ lol 18:16:40 I'm happy just to get the conversation started. So why don't I just add to etherpad for now. What's the date on the summit? 18:16:51 #action cp16net check on remote participation at summit 18:16:52 week of 26th nov 18:16:58 October 26-29 18:17:06 last week of oct 18:17:17 vkmc: No. But Magnum is an even more interesting discussion because of Kubernetes. If Trove used Magnum, control would be given over to Kubernetes to some degree. 18:17:21 * amrith wonders what summit cp16net is going to 18:17:32 how far along in terms of adoption are nova-docker and magnum? 18:17:48 mat-lowery, interesting 18:18:07 sorry, October 27-30 18:18:10 atomic77, magnum is recent, nova-docker has been around a bit. 18:18:18 yes, I guess I'm off by a month 18:18:26 I wonder what summit I'd have ended up at 18:18:42 #action amrith must check m tickets and make sure I have the right dates. 18:19:00 yikes 18:19:03 seems we already have the slots https://www.openstack.org/summit/tokyo-2015/schedule/design-summit 18:19:06 can you at least send me your credit card if you got the dates wrong 18:19:28 * amrith has an oh shit moment 18:19:42 the earliest we have is Oct 29 at 11am 18:20:42 ok i think this is something that more conversation and research needs to go into 18:20:55 is there anything else related to this? 18:21:12 cp16net: ok for now I'll add stuff to the etherpad. we can sync back up after summit 18:21:17 I'm all done. 18:21:28 mat-lowery, we can chat offline if you'd like and I'll take notes to summit 18:21:37 that sounds great! thanks mat-lowery 18:21:39 amrith: sounds good 18:22:37 chat in the chan because i'd like to know as well 18:22:43 ok moving ok... 18:22:49 me too 18:22:54 cp16net++ 18:23:08 #topic Refactor of Manager class [peterstac] 18:23:24 ok peterstac 18:23:42 I think I put most of the info in the agenda item 18:23:47 but to recap: 18:24:15 If we want to create a base manager class to make datastore management easier, now is the time to do it 18:24:54 I've done a simple refactor locally and added code to fix the state change issue 18:25:00 (to prove the concept works) 18:25:20 So I pushed up a spec outlining the details 18:25:34 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/231572 18:25:52 If we're going to do this, we 18:25:53 #link http://docs-draft.openstack.org/72/231572/1/check/gate-trove-specs-docs/c7d09a0//doc/build/html/specs/mitaka/datastore-manager-refactor.html 18:26:04 we'd need some feedback soon 18:26:06 I've read the spec, I like it 18:26:26 i need to look it over 18:26:27 we've talked about this before 18:26:40 in the context most recently of some stuff that was done late in liberty 18:26:49 i agree that things like this need to be done early 18:26:51 don't recall the exact thing; it was during or just after mid-cycle 18:27:03 and we said we'd do it early (like 1st thing) in m release. 18:27:09 yup 18:27:20 I would like to put foot-on-gas-pedal and move this one up 18:27:35 cp16net maybe we can ask for some review priority on it? 18:27:38 It wasn't as big a change as I originally thought it would be - a lot of it was just deleting code once it'd been added to the base class ;) 18:27:40 Ctrl-C/Ctrl-V based coding is getting very hard to maintain. 18:28:25 yeah lets get eyes on it so we can work out issues early in the cycle 18:28:58 cp16net, can we set a target of getting reviews on this during this week and target to have code reviews in shortly thereafter? 18:29:00 I'm hoping to push up the actual changeset for the code in the next day or two (just finalizing it) but I don't want to spend too much time just in case there's a problem with the spec 18:29:10 peterstac, perfect 18:29:18 :D 18:29:51 sounds good we can see where we are at the next meeting on this 18:29:59 to keep it on peoples minds 18:30:24 ok, I'll take it on myself to keep bugging people about it ;) 18:30:28 ++ 18:30:41 i'll also look over the blueprints to see which ones should be looked at 18:30:48 ++ 18:31:03 #action cp16net priotitize blueprints for mitaka 18:31:28 sounds good; that's all I had 18:31:56 we can talk about them next meeting 18:32:00 sound good? 18:32:07 or at least at the summit for sure 18:32:17 (if not sooner than next meeting) 18:32:23 I'd love to see this merged quickly 18:32:32 so that we don't have a lot of people who have to deal with merges 18:32:33 later 18:32:51 i'd agree 18:32:59 ok moving on... 18:33:15 #topic Is it time to merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/220288/1 [amrith] 18:33:21 this should be quick 18:33:23 lets do this now... 18:33:27 ok 18:33:29 done 18:33:33 moving along 18:33:47 +2 18:34:15 I'll let you approve the review. 18:34:23 this doesn't seem like the kind of thing I'd 'fast track' 18:34:28 given that we aren't in crunch-time. 18:34:40 hey, that was quick! 18:34:44 thanks folks 18:34:48 awesome 18:34:56 ok moving along 18:35:04 who said we had a velocity of reviews problem in trove ... bah, humbug. 18:35:18 #topic Open Discussion 18:36:10 only other thing i wanted to let everyone know about is the mitaka release schedule 18:36:15 18:26 < peterstac> we'd need some feedback soon 18:36:24 whoops bad paste 18:36:33 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mitaka_Release_Schedule 18:37:26 interesting schedule 18:37:54 then the next summit everyone is coming to my neck of the woods :) 18:38:25 are we going to focus on something in particular this cycle? it would be nice to discuss that if there is something clear 18:38:46 every 13th summit is in Austin, or so I hear 18:39:31 cp16net, do you know if there's any movement on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203880/? 18:39:53 I would like to get something related to that into the m release (from trove). 18:40:02 i wasnt aware of that 18:40:12 thanks for bringing it up 18:41:23 that looks interesting 18:41:25 i starred it to keep it on my list of pataches to watch 18:41:51 in other 'open discussion' stuff, oslo is looking to us for things we'd like oslo to do. 18:42:06 I suggested that oslo.messaging should provide the option for a client to create an encrypted channel. 18:42:22 rather than the current 'solution' that you configure rabbit SSL/TLS under the covers. 18:42:25 a topic I wanted to bring for the open discussion is, once again, the problem we have with the guestagent not being secure enough 18:42:33 I've got some questions related to that in the last couple of weeks 18:42:41 and I think it makes sense to discuss this again 18:42:54 vkmc, I'd love to have a discussion of that. I think there is way too much misinformation about that subject floating around. 18:43:07 maybe a good topic for summit. 18:43:07 I guess that yes 18:43:16 indeed 18:43:24 yeah that is something we should probably document 18:43:54 the tenant isolation patch SlickNik made got merged on RC1 for Liberty 18:44:12 still, seems like that approach is not considered to be the enough 18:44:20 i think SlickNik had documented some of the new single_tenant_remote.py but i'm not sure where that is 18:44:25 vkmc, by whom? 18:44:48 or more importantly, why? 18:45:02 amrith, by customers trying to deploy that 18:45:13 i recall someone in the channel saying that its bad that the guest instance is connected to the infra rabbit queue 18:45:21 see previous comment about misinformation. 18:45:27 I'm personally not very convinced with it... but maybe is because I don't understand it properly 18:45:37 so, lets do this. 18:45:44 (a) let's discuss it at summit 18:45:47 (b) let's document 18:45:57 (c) let's make the changes that we think are required. 18:46:09 sounds very good to me 18:46:15 i would think it would make sense to have vkmc document the challenges she has heard from the field before summit 18:46:16 yeah i think that sounds like a plan 18:46:31 dougshelley66, will do that :) 18:46:36 vkmc thanks 18:46:51 I cannot use the bot but still... 18:47:04 cp16net, please give vkmc an action ;) 18:47:10 you are the BOSS! 18:47:34 #action vkmc create an etherpad with the concerns raised with the tenant isolation solution for the trove deployment concern 18:47:37 or something like that 18:47:38 heh 18:47:42 sounds good 18:47:47 he who says #startmeeting assigns the #actionitems, old jungle saying. 18:47:49 btw anyone can make an action 18:48:00 really? sweet 18:48:06 but I can't use #link 18:48:12 you can 18:48:12 #link www.google.com 18:48:31 just cant change topics and start/end meeting 18:48:41 unless you are added as a chair 18:48:45 oh, ok. 18:48:56 anything else? 18:49:39 #action add items we would like from oslo.messaging 18:50:44 cp16net I don't know if it was just oslo.messaging 18:50:46 vkmc: re: focus for cycle i'd say i'm working on that with the blueprints and will have more ideas laid out for the next meeting 18:50:57 cp16net++ 18:51:12 ok thanks everyone 18:51:19 #endmeeting