14:00:26 #startmeeting tripleo 14:00:31 Meeting started Tue Nov 24 14:00:26 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is marios. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:32 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:35 The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo' 14:00:35 oh noe no bot :D 14:00:39 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M1U-ekjEsec-bRjRq7q5rzjbJWKE2uT-ESX4SkeC0Uc/edit#gid=0 14:00:42 line 8 14:01:07 marios: Error: Can't start another meeting, one is in progress. Use #endmeeting first. 14:01:20 heh 14:01:21 ah maybe a delay in my client... ? 14:01:24 sshnaidm, stay on 14:01:32 #topic agenda 14:01:32 * Review past action items 14:01:32 * One off agenda items 14:01:32 * Bugs & Blueprints 14:01:32 * Projects releases or stable backports 14:01:34 * Specs 14:01:37 * open discussion 14:01:39 Anyone can use the #link, #action and #info commands, not just the moderatorǃ 14:01:40 \o/ 14:01:42 Hey folks! who's around? 14:01:44 o/ 14:01:44 o/ 14:01:47 o/ 14:01:49 O/ 14:01:52 o/ 14:01:55 o/ 14:01:57 o/ 14:02:05 o/ 14:02:11 o> 14:02:30 #topic one off agenda items 14:02:31 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items 14:03:01 0/ 14:03:03 so there are a few items this week - folks do you want to hilight something in particular? please go ahead 14:03:25 #info (beagles) the resurrection of designate is underway. More of an FYI at the moment but the immediate goal is to get things "working enough" so we can enable an actual designate test. 14:03:32 #info (fultonj) can we merge? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/723108 + https://review.opendev.org/#/c/757644 14:03:56 o/ 14:04:05 #info 16>17 upgrade (standalone and tripleo-upgrade based) 14:04:07 o/ 14:04:11 o/ 14:04:34 #info container sync to quay Arx has also now posted the log where this sync / copy can be viewed. If you end up hitting an issue when pulling containers from quay, this log would be a good place to poke at.http://38.102.83.131/copy-quay.txt 14:04:37 the designate thing pretty much speaks for itself - there's a bit of work to do on it before it makes sense to move it out deployment/experimental 14:04:53 #info stable/victoria upgrade jobs are now voting https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/763005 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/760323 14:04:59 beagles: any links to add there for reviews? 14:05:09 #info trying to remove redundant content providers (from upgrade jobs) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/761188/7//COMMIT_MSG 14:05:19 #info https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/tripleo-specs+status:open please review & authors update specs - M1 is 4th December we should be merged (way before) by then. 14:05:28 #info stein extended maintenance http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/018680.html 14:05:34 marios: nothing of note yet 14:05:38 thanks beagles 14:05:50 anyone want to hilight something from that list or add anything else ? 14:05:53 regarding the ceph specs 14:06:09 they've had sufficient +2's for 2 weeks 14:06:29 so if it's ok with everyone i'd like for them to be +w'd 14:06:33 fultonj: agree i think we can merge those . i was going to propose this friday anything that has enough reviews/+2 and no objections will be merged 14:06:40 we're actually close to having one of the implemented 14:06:41 wrt specs i mean fultonj 14:07:16 marios: ok, thanks. do you want to +w them or should i? 14:07:25 fultonj: sure go ahead 14:07:48 fultonj: i think there has been plenty time for objections 14:07:54 thanks will do 14:08:21 k anything else? reminder you can use https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items to request reviews or hilight any other tripleo related issue you want to in the next meeting 14:09:03 #topic Bugs & Blueprints 14:09:05 #link https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/victoria-1 14:09:22 arxcruz|rover: rfolco|ruck: are there any known blocking gate issues currently that are worth hilighting? 14:09:32 fmount: gfidente: fyi ^ 14:09:57 any bugs that folks want to bring attention to. anyone blocked by ci issues? 14:10:16 marios: besides the regex in tripleo-ansible no 14:10:25 arxcruz|rover: do we have a bug for that? 14:10:29 we observed some gate issues, let us know if any consistent one 14:10:54 marios: no, we don't just a patch, we notice yesterday some jobs did not trigger 14:11:04 k thank you arxcruz|rover and rfolco|ruck for your sevice :D 14:11:07 investigating today, we found the wrong regex 14:11:29 marios: that launchpad link probably need to change to wallaby-1? 14:11:44 #info fyi tripleo the CI squad is operating a weekly ruck rover rotation until the end of the year. so you need to look for |ruck and |rover 14:11:47 ramishra: yes you are right 14:11:51 ramishra: thanks will update my copy/pasta 14:12:04 #link https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/wallaby-1 14:12:40 then if nothing else on bugs lets move on 14:12:47 this is not about bug but it seems that the new gerrit has some limitations about integration with LP 14:12:52 #topic projects releases or stable backports 14:13:11 sorry was too late to post it :-P 14:13:21 tkajinam: sec... 14:13:28 #topic Bugs & Blueprints 14:13:32 tkajinam: go ahead :D 14:13:58 AFAIK it doesn't update bug assignee automatically when we submit a fix to gerrit 14:14:05 and it doesn't put patch link to blueprints 14:14:15 tkajinam: yes you're right, i saw something on openstack-discuss this morning worth hilighting here 14:14:18 tkajinam: thanks 14:14:22 I think the detail is shared in openstack-discuss ml but the above two is worth noting 14:14:29 tkajinam: apparently it will only update on patch merge 14:14:29 marios, yeah I saw that mail 14:14:57 tkajinam: so we have to manually update launchpad until this bug is fixed 14:15:26 marios, of you fix the bug quickly, before any other guys start working on it ;-) 14:15:28 #info we need to manually update launchpad on updates to gerrit changes (fixes-bug/related-bug etc) due to bugs in the recent upgrade 14:15:38 Harald Jensås proposed openstack/tripleo-ansible master: Introduce role/instance 'networks' key https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible/+/762160 14:15:50 thanks tkajinam 14:15:52 s/of/or/ 14:15:53 np 14:16:00 anything else folks want to mention re bugs? 14:16:55 #topic projects releases or stable backports 14:17:15 as mentioned earlier we have transitioned stein branch to extended maintenance http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/018680.html 14:17:34 the relevant patch merged yesterday https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/762411 14:18:10 weshay|ruck: and i were discussing the posibility of moving queens and rocky, probably rocky first, to unmaintained 14:18:22 but i haven't yet put anything into motion 14:18:23 Merged openstack/tripleo-specs master: Introduce tripleo-ceph-client spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/757644 14:18:37 just socialising this for now so folks can shout if they have violent disagreements at this stage 14:18:57 anything else release/stable related. does anyone need a release for something? 14:19:57 k then we can move on ... 14:20:08 #topic specs 14:20:08 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tripleo-specs+status:open 14:20:32 so m1 is next week and we should merge anything we expect to do in wallaby before then 14:20:50 i think there have been good reviews on many of the specs at least the ones I saw. 14:21:03 aye.. IMHO it looks like rocky can go 14:21:13 i propose that we merge anything with enough reviews by this friday. Are there any objections? 14:21:19 cloudnull: planning to merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/752078 ? 14:21:20 queens tbd 14:21:41 weshay|ruck: ack we can bring more on that in the open discussion momentarily? 14:22:21 dsneddon: o/ are you planning on updating https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/758249 14:22:26 dsneddon: there are a few comments there 14:22:59 so reviewers please update your specs if you want to get them merged by this week? and reviewers please spend some time before friday to review 14:23:22 #info reviewers please update your specs if you want to get them merged by this friday https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tripleo-specs+status:open 14:23:36 oops i meant proposers :D but i hope you get what i mean 14:23:49 :) 14:24:21 #info please update your specs if you want to get them merged by this friday https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tripleo-specs+status:open 14:24:34 k ... anything else about specs 14:25:08 fultonj: does this friday work for you? 14:25:21 this friday is a holiday in the US 14:25:31 fultonj: unless you already +A i mean up to you its OK to just go ahead imo since we have brought up the ceph specs many times 14:25:36 fultonj: good point forgot about thanksgiving 14:25:51 fultonj: ack well i will merge what i can if it isn't by friday ... hows that :D 14:25:52 marios: as per our conversation i did the +w 14:25:57 fultonj: ack 14:26:10 k moving on then 14:26:25 amolkahat proposed openstack/tripleo-ci master: Removed ubi-8 based jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/760426 14:26:27 #topic open discussion 14:26:37 so anything else folks want to bring up? 14:26:53 16:21 < weshay|ruck> aye.. IMHO it looks like rocky can go 14:27:04 aye 14:27:14 as we discussed weshay|ruck i think we are free to propose rocky tripleo-* things to move to unmaintained or even EOL if we want to 14:27:26 because we don't use the stable:follows-policy tag anwhere on tripleo repos 14:27:44 so there shouldn't be a foundation reason to stop us if we decide as a community that is what we need to do 14:27:50 but i may be wrong about that 14:27:51 :D 14:27:56 right.. we're saying this because upstream policy allows for it.. for rocky, and there are 0 imports from upstream for rocky 14:28:08 i guess we will find out once we try to do it 14:28:29 which is a contrast to queens where upstream may be imported again 14:28:32 marios, aye 14:28:32 so we can socialise it here for now and obviously it will be sent to the openstack-discuss list for discussion objections etc 14:28:38 ++ from me 14:29:28 fyi if interested https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#maintenance-phases 14:29:55 ack there are some plans to get some fixes in to octavia/queens before it closes down but ditching rocky would be a good thing afaiac 14:29:56 #info possibly moving all tripleo-* stable/rocky to unmaintained or even EOL to be determined 14:30:23 thanks beagles 14:30:29 thanks weshay|ruck 14:30:43 any other topics folks want to bring up 14:30:44 ? 14:31:30 then all that remains is to say thanks to all for participating 14:31:37 #endmeeting tripleo