14:00:40 #startmeeting tripleo 14:00:40 #topic agenda 14:00:40 Meeting started Tue Aug 21 14:00:40 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mwhahaha. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:40 * Review past action items 14:00:40 * One off agenda items 14:00:40 * Squad status 14:00:41 * Bugs & Blueprints 14:00:41 * Projects releases or stable backports 14:00:41 * Specs 14:00:41 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:42 * open discussion 14:00:42 wait that might have been early 14:00:42 Anyone can use the #link, #action and #info commands, not just the moderatorǃ 14:00:43 Hi everyone! who is around today? 14:00:44 The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo' 14:00:44 o/ 14:00:44 «o/ 14:00:45 o/ 14:00:46 o/ 14:00:50 o/ 14:00:50 o/ 14:00:58 o/ 14:01:05 hi 14:01:12 o/ 14:01:14 hi 14:01:50 o/ 14:01:56 o/ 14:02:12 o/ 14:02:14 o/ 14:02:17 o/ 14:02:22 o/ 14:02:45 alright looks like we have some folks here, let's go 14:02:50 #topic review past action items 14:02:55 mwhahaha to move all non-critical bugs to Stein - DONE 14:03:13 as we're trying to get RC1 done, we should focus on the current critical bugs 14:03:33 so please make sure we're addressing any critical issues 14:03:42 EmilienM to release tripleoclient and branch stable/rocky this week - IN PROGRESS - Should be done today. 14:03:42 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/593983/ 14:04:00 we'll be branching tripleoclient bits this week (might be today) 14:04:09 once it's merged, we'll need to see how CI jobs work on this branch 14:04:13 so we'll need to make sure the rocky CI is functioning correctly 14:04:17 clear any blocker before releasing anything else 14:04:31 * mwhahaha pokes weshay ssbarnea|ruck 14:05:00 along those lines 14:05:01 EmilienM to release other tripleo projects rc1 week of Aug 27th - IN PROGRESS 14:05:10 so that's next week 14:05:18 mwhahaha: ack there is a list of promotion blockers (at least one rocky issue) at https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/ruckrover-sprint18 fyi... afaik they are all ongoing fixes 14:05:36 o/ 14:05:45 k so let's focus on those 14:06:22 mwhahaha to create additional stein milestones - DONE 14:06:31 so we have stein-2/3 in launch pad 14:06:40 jaosorior will be on the hook for all things stein 14:06:47 * mwhahaha tosses the grenade 14:06:48 for rocky we need https://review.openstack.org/#/c/593383/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591982/, and two promotions for rocky to unblock fs037 14:07:15 :D 14:07:26 as fs037 needs centos7-rocky/previous-current-tripleo 14:08:09 k ykarel do we know why ci is unhappy with those? 14:08:24 mwhahaha, timeouts random 14:08:27 k 14:08:32 moving on then 14:08:36 #topic one off agenda items 14:08:36 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-meeting-items 14:08:50 Outstanding blueprints (mwhahaha) 14:09:00 there are two blueprints with FFE 14:09:07 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/container-prepare-workflow 14:09:12 there are two outstanding patches for that one 14:09:23 I think we're waiting on some promotion bits however, not completely sure 14:09:34 i'll poke stevebaker later 14:09:45 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-routed-networks-templates 14:10:00 that one still has a few patches out as well 14:10:17 URGENT TRIPLEO TASKS NEED ATTENTION 14:10:18 https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1786764 14:10:18 Launchpad bug 1786764 in tripleo "tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-updates times out on prepare" [Critical,In progress] - Assigned to Jiří Stránský (jistr) 14:10:19 https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1787910 14:10:19 hjensas, dsneddon: not sure is there any outstanding issues related to those patches -^ 14:10:20 Launchpad bug 1787910 in tripleo "OVB overcloud deploy fails on nova placement errors" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Marios Andreou (marios-b) 14:11:46 moving on 14:11:47 Critical bugs for rc1 (mwhahaha) 14:11:54 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&assignee_option=any&field.milestone%3Alist=86267&search=Search 14:12:01 we've got ~24 bugs marked critical 14:12:11 please take a look if they are really critical for rc1 14:12:52 any other one off agenda things? 14:14:27 ok moving on 14:14:30 #topic Squad status 14:14:30 ci 14:14:30 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ci-squad-meeting 14:14:30 upgrade 14:14:30 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-upgrade-squad-status 14:14:30 containers 14:14:30 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-containers-squad-status 14:14:31 config-download 14:14:31 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-config-download-squad-status 14:14:32 integration 14:14:32 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-integration-squad-status 14:14:33 ui/cli 14:14:33 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ui-cli-squad-status 14:14:34 validations 14:14:34 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-validations-squad-status 14:14:35 networking 14:14:35 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-networking-squad-status 14:14:36 workflows 14:14:36 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-workflows-squad-status 14:14:37 security 14:14:37 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-security-squad 14:14:50 anyone have any specific status related items? 14:15:04 hi, so i proposed a few squad changes 14:15:13 first is disbanding config-download squad 14:15:18 +1 14:15:20 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594157/ 14:15:26 mission accomplished! 14:15:33 oh noes 14:15:34 +2 14:15:38 now you've doomed it 14:15:45 second is a new squad focused our related edge work 14:15:52 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594161/ 14:16:20 and there is a related kick off discussion on the ML 14:16:45 sounds good 14:16:46 not a lot of structure atm, just trying to stir the pot and kick some ideas around 14:16:56 i assume we'll have further discussions about the scope at the PTG 14:17:08 yes, so that'd be one of our first goals 14:17:19 is planning for some things to work through at the ptg 14:17:28 one thing I heard mentioned is how to tackle some of the edge discussions which span multiple projects 14:17:33 also there is an all day Edge working group on Tuesday that we should participate in 14:17:42 shardy: well, see ^^ :) 14:17:52 slagle: ack yeah seems like the right forum for it :) 14:18:07 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/EdgeComputingGroupPTG4 14:18:09 that is there etherpad 14:18:19 slagle: thanks! 14:18:19 i plan to represent TripleO, and hope a few others will join me :) 14:18:39 * shardy aims to be there 14:18:42 same 14:18:53 sounds good 14:19:06 related: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ptg-queens-split-controlplane 14:19:20 I was wondering if we need some sort of cross-project working group beyond the PTG, but I guess we can decide that in Denver 14:19:20 we could bring our feedback from deployment tools 14:19:37 because so far, discussions are around core projects 14:19:59 fultonj: ack yeah, be good to have the edge discussion before that, as there's been a lot of related requirements under discussion at various times 14:20:31 shardy: fultonj : yea, so that's one of my goals is to sort of align some of this fringe work that is loosely related 14:20:31 I'd like to see more clearly defined what we need to deploy, e.g some reference architectures, then we can adapt the tooling to enable it 14:20:54 shardy: fultonj : and start defining a good story/focus on how tripleo can address the edge 14:20:56 some diagrams etc would be really helpful, showing the split between storage, compute, cells, control-plane etc 14:21:23 slagle: yeah, get some better requirements to develop that story 14:21:29 sounds good 14:21:46 count me in for these discussions! 14:21:53 Daniel Alvarez proposed openstack/tripleo-quickstart master: DNM: OVN tempest test https://review.openstack.org/587830 14:22:09 slagle: there's one diagram in the split ctl plane spec https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/rocky/split-controlplane.html 14:22:10 alright any other status related items? 14:22:16 but it needs more details 14:22:17 abishop: cool, folks who want to participate please sign up on the etherpad 14:22:19 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-edge-squad-status 14:22:30 and input from cinder/glance team 14:22:49 slagle: ack, will do 14:23:18 sign up https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-edge-squad-status 14:23:20 fultonj: ah yeah, forgot about that, thanks - agree a v2.0 of that with more detail would be great 14:23:39 # 14:23:57 #link https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/rocky/split-controlplane.html 14:24:31 abishop can you get cinder comments for v2 version of diagram? 14:24:56 anything else? 14:25:21 fultonj: yes, which will likely me getting more cinder cores involved (which is good) 14:25:54 alright moving on 14:25:58 #topic bugs & blueprints 14:25:58 #link https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/rocky-rc1 14:25:58 For Rocky we currently have 42 (+0) blueprints and about 24 open Launchpad bugs. 24 rocky-rc1, 694 stein-1. 109 (+0) open Storyboard bugs. 14:25:58 #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project_group/76 14:26:10 as previously mentioned rc1 is soonish (next week hopefully) 14:26:19 please take a look at the bugs 14:26:37 any other issues? 14:28:48 sounds like nope, moving on 14:28:49 #topic projects releases or stable backports 14:29:03 as mentioned, tripleoclient to be branched this week 14:29:10 we released stable versions last week (i think) 14:30:44 moving on 14:30:48 #topic specs 14:30:48 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tripleo-specs+status:open 14:30:58 reminder since the PTG is coming up, we should have specs/blueprints 14:31:05 please take a look at the open ones as well 14:31:16 anyone have any specs they would like to call out? 14:31:47 well, the validation spec still needs some work 14:32:05 especially for your question about "in-deploy validation" in fact, mwhahaha :) 14:32:22 k i'll try and take a look again as well 14:32:29 but still, it should be ready for PTG. 14:33:22 sounds good 14:33:23 #topic open discussion 14:33:25 anything else? 14:33:44 During stein I'd like to move the ceph version beyond Lumionus to Mimic and maybe Nautalis (hopefully first drop in January) so I'll make a Blueprint 14:33:50 need anything more? 14:34:07 should be fine 14:34:08 it will be tested in ci before being promoted 14:34:10 ack 14:34:31 in stein since we'll be focusing on python3 and partially fedora, is there going to be a version compatible with that? 14:35:46 yes, that is the plan ceph has 14:35:50 k 14:36:28 still having trouble with how the UI config is being written (or not) I think Emilien is looking into it 14:36:41 rabbit hole 14:38:04 jrist: did we determine if it is a quickstart issue or is it happening under normal conditions (manual) 14:38:23 mwhahaha: not yet, but I suspect both. 14:38:32 based on what I've done so far 14:38:45 quickstart isn't doing its things and the config isn't written 14:38:54 so what is our goal. not having to rely on quickstart for that? 14:38:55 I'd say yes 14:39:33 related, validations are not showing up in thee UI and neither are default plans 14:39:41 i would not rely on quickstart for that bits 14:39:44 and do something else 14:39:48 aye 14:40:14 i know what quickstart was doing isn't going to work with containers 14:40:27 so if you can still let it install but you'll need to sshuttle yourself or something 14:40:48 that won't work down the line 14:40:51 but yeah 14:40:59 we need to come up with something new 14:41:50 we should probably schedule a meeting to chat about what the ui needs so we can help out on that 14:41:58 cause i'm not sure what exactly won't work around that 14:42:29 mathieu bultel proposed openstack/python-tripleoclient master: Keep plan on update and store user env_files into swift https://review.openstack.org/583145 14:42:37 alright anything else? 14:44:48 thanks everyone 14:44:50 #endmeeting