07:04:35 #startmeeting TripleO Weekly 07:04:36 Meeting started Wed Aug 6 07:04:35 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is marios. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 07:04:37 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 07:04:39 The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo_weekly' 07:04:52 can someone help with the meetbot? 07:04:54 shadower: ? 07:05:00 #agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TripleO 07:05:09 OK. 07:05:13 #topic Bugs 07:05:36 marios: you have tamed the bot :-) 07:05:50 lsmola: srsly, feel free to add links/notes esp if you know meetbot 07:05:53 Going well so far :) I think only you can use the topic and startvote commands, but anyone can use note, link, info 07:06:11 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/ 07:06:13 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/diskimage-builder/ 07:06:15 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-refresh-config 07:06:17 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-apply-config 07:06:19 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-collect-config 07:06:21 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-cloud-config 07:06:23 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tuskar 07:06:25 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-tuskarclient 07:06:27 thanks tchaypo 07:06:38 OK bunch of criticals for tripleo 07:06:40 tripleo has 8 criticals 07:06:47 marios: unfortunately I don't know it :-) 07:06:53 I'm seeing 4 with no assignee 07:07:19 anyone looked at any of these? updates? questions? discussion 07:07:31 * marios hasn't looked at bugs for a few days 07:07:35 one of those is fixed, I'm assigning to bnemec as he added the update to say it's fix committed 07:07:44 tchaypo: remember which? 07:08:18 https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1352336 07:08:20 Launchpad bug 1352336 in tripleo "init-keystone fails with ConnectionRefused" [Critical,Fix committed] 07:09:01 #info https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1352336 critical tripleo will be updated to fix-committed by tchaypo 07:09:07 anything else? 07:09:30 not that I can see can be fixed right now. 07:09:43 #topic reviews 07:10:06 #link http://www.stackalytics.com/report/reviews/tripleo-group/open 07:10:21 http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/tripleo-group/30 07:10:28 probably don't need link for these 07:10:36 marios: there's a chunk to copy/paste on the wiki page under https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TripleO#reviews 07:10:46 ah thanks 07:10:53 #info There's a new dashboard linked from https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO#Review_team - look for "TripleO Inbox Dashboard" 07:10:57 #link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-openreviews.html 07:10:59 #link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt 07:11:02 #link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt 07:11:18 is it 3rd quartile we look at 07:11:40 anyone? 07:11:42 Yes, usually 07:11:55 3rd quartile wait time: 12 days, 16 hours, 50 minutes 07:12:05 Under Stats since the last revision without -1 or -2 : 07:12:16 AH in which case 07:12:18 3rd quartile wait time: 15 days, 13 hours, 47 minutes 07:12:20 ouch 07:12:31 #info 3rd quartile of Stats since the last revision without -1 or -2 has slipped to >15.5 days 07:12:53 #info median is 7 days, but average is 11. We are developing a nasty long tail. 07:12:58 vacation + conferences + the sprint? 07:13:00 everyone doing their 3-a-day? 07:13:03 could be just a summer outlier 07:13:06 yeah was about to ask about holidays 07:13:18 but still its the highest number i can remember recently anyway 07:13:35 I think vacation + conferences + midcycle probably explains it 07:13:40 marios: I've been OOO for month, I hope we don't have to do reviews on vacation :-D 07:13:42 yeah forgot about midcycle 07:13:50 lsmola: OF COURSE YOU DO! 07:13:51 I know I haven't had time to look at reviews since before the midcycle.. 07:13:54 marios: hehe 07:14:04 OK 07:14:09 So in summary, how about we say: 07:14:33 we've had a lot of people away with vacation/conferences/mid-cycle but we really need cores to start picking up the slack and knocking out some of the older reviews 07:14:48 yep 07:14:50 thanks tchaypo that sounds fine 07:15:00 would we note that? 07:15:01 tchaypo: sounds reasonable 07:15:11 FWIW http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt still shows 13 people with 60 reviews in the last 30 days 07:15:17 #note tchaypo> we've had a lot of people away with vacation/conferences/mid-cycle but we really need cores to start picking up the slack and knocking out some of the older reviews 07:15:36 marios: thanks :) 07:15:45 anything else here? 07:15:59 #topic CI 07:16:06 anyone around for a summary/status? 07:16:08 derek? 07:16:25 http://goodsquishy.com/downloads/s_tripleo-jobs.htmlk has a summary 07:16:28 http://goodsquishy.com/downloads/s_tripleo-jobs.html 07:16:33 thanks :) 07:16:47 #link http://goodsquishy.com/downloads/s_tripleo-jobs.html 07:17:04 I'd love to get some graphs on that so we have some idea how that compares historically 07:17:07 so 29.5% sounds bad, but i don't know what it ususally is 07:17:09 right 07:17:25 My understanding from discussion at the mid-cycle is that we expect a lot more capacity to come online soon 07:17:52 we're almost getting hp1 back, we should have hp2 before long, another vendor is getting close to having a region available for us 07:18:32 so we expect that not only will we see things moving a *lot* faster, we'll be able to add more tests and still see things move faster 07:18:53 right, was about to ask about the correlation (i.e. more capacity --> more jobs faster?) 07:19:02 greatstuff 07:19:05 more jobs in parallel at least 07:19:21 OK. anything else here? 07:19:31 specs seems to have been removed from the agenda 07:19:32 i notice release isn't on the agenda 07:19:36 and that 07:19:41 #topic release 07:19:46 I'm not sure why; I got the impression from the mid-cycle that folk found it handy to have around 07:19:46 i'd like to volunteer this week 07:19:56 marios: I accept your vonunteerism 07:19:57 unless someone else wants to 07:20:02 s/vonun/volun/ 07:20:14 cool, shadower i may bug you a bit... only had one question really about it 07:20:32 who is an OpenStack release manager for stable branches 07:20:37 (of a given project) 07:20:44 from https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/ReleaseManagement 07:21:03 OK will resolve offline 07:21:29 #topic tuskar 07:21:54 lsmola: quick summary? or shadower dougal? 07:22:15 lots of work on the heat templates 07:22:27 We have made great progress with Tuskar development tasks. 07:22:53 I think we are getting close to having something working which will cover the majority of features in the Tuskar specs 07:23:11 jdob was working on integration yesterday and seemed to be making decent progress. 07:23:19 Integration of the different pieces that is. 07:23:40 anything the wider group can help with at the moment? 07:24:08 d0ugal: great thanks for the summary 07:24:14 moving on unless there is anything else 07:24:17 I think we are good but code reviews are always useful. 07:24:21 That's all from me :) 07:24:38 OK so the agenda ends here guys 07:24:45 is there anything else we want to talk about? specs? 07:25:00 I have a spec you can review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111985/ 07:25:18 lsmola: what is this in relation to? 07:25:18 that should finally solve the overcloud keystone init 07:25:38 marios: can you set the topic to specs? 07:25:40 OK... sec 07:25:43 It has been big pain in the ass for the UI for a long time :-) 07:25:43 yeah tchaypo just realised 07:25:45 thanks 07:25:48 #topic specs 07:25:59 so lsmola> I have a spec you can review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111985/ 07:26:28 #note: review request for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111985/ 07:26:33 :) 07:26:39 :-) thank you 07:26:58 #topic open discussion 07:27:11 geez you guys are chatty today 07:27:14 too much coffee? 07:27:21 unless there is anything else 07:27:24 we can move on with our lives 07:27:30 yes, my fingers are shaking :-) 07:27:30 marios: grumble grumble morning grumble 07:27:40 There was one thing I wanted to say 07:27:45 If I could remember what it was .... 07:27:52 tchaypo: lol 07:27:54 srsly :) 07:28:10 #note tchaypo was going to say something important but forgot what it was 07:28:15 lol 07:28:15 I think it was that I checked the 90-day reviewer stats, and we have 14 who have made 180 reviews there (3x 60 work days) 07:28:18 lol :-D 07:28:34 #link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt 07:28:37 so compared against 13 who have made 60 in the last 30 days, that sounds like the problem is not cores not doing enough 07:28:50 tchaypo: Doesn't that include weekends tho'? 07:28:54 but probably we're getting a higher volume, and/or some tricky reviews are hanging around longer 07:29:03 oh wait, nm 07:29:08 :) 07:29:16 * d0ugal hasn't had enough coffee 07:29:33 marios: lifeless, tchaypo, anteaya, jogo and I were all at PyCon AU last week. Takes a few days to get brain space back :-) 07:29:35 tchaypo: I've seen a lot of reviews that were being held up because of the CI 07:29:56 StevenK: I'm still recovering from EuroPython :) 07:29:59 StevenK: yeah i caught you guyz mid curry negotiations with lifeless 07:30:08 Haha 07:30:12 StevenK: it was morning and i was craving a vindaloo at 9 am 07:30:21 Ah yes, I remember that 07:30:29 OK thanks all unless there is antying else? 07:30:30 tchaypo and I are considering PyCon NZ 07:30:31 anyone tripleo-cd-admins wanting to help with CI rollout your help would be massively appreciated 07:30:32 shadower: +1, I've noticed that too. 07:30:43 lets continue in #tripleo 07:30:46 derek has documented the bighammer burning script on the etherpad 07:31:05 StevenK: considering? I'm in the middle of booking 07:31:06 lifeless: is that re the build fail rate 07:31:22 marios: well, capacity 07:31:25 marios: and coverage 07:31:44 lifeless: tchaypo updated us about hp2 coming soon + other vendor 07:31:53 #note Any tripleo-cd-admins http://goodsquishy.com/downloads/s_tripleo-jobs.html - lifeless notes that derek has documented the bighammer burning script on the etherpad 07:32:01 thanks :) 07:32:06 tchaypo: *and tat we need help* 07:32:33 anything else for discussion? 07:32:44 otherwise we get an extra half hour for reviews 07:32:46 :) 07:32:51 yaay :-) 07:33:02 thanks all for your 'input' ;) 07:33:08 tchaypo: thanks 07:33:12 #endmeeting