06:59:56 #startmeeting tripleo 06:59:57 Meeting started Wed Jun 25 06:59:56 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is tchaypo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 06:59:58 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 07:00:00 The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo' 07:00:04 Welcome everyone! 07:00:06 hello 07:00:22 I'd like to start this week with a reminder that anyone can use #info and #link to get notes into the meeting minutes 07:00:26 morning! o/ 07:00:46 I'm happy to summarise lengthy discussions, but if you've just got something quick to say and you'd like it to be noted, please feel free to tag it yourself :) 07:01:16 We're following the agenda at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TripleO#Agenda_for_next_meeting which I'm not going to paste here 07:01:20 #topic bugs 07:01:29 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/ 07:01:32 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/diskimage-builder/ 07:01:34 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-refresh-config 07:01:36 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-apply-config 07:01:38 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-collect-config 07:01:40 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-cloud-config 07:01:42 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tuskar 07:01:44 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-tuskarclient 07:01:56 How are we going this week? 07:03:53 I'm not seeing any unassigned criticals on incubator 07:04:21 GheRivero: do you have an update for bug 1319979 ? 07:04:22 Launchpad bug 1319979 in tripleo "rabbitmq-server fails to restart in check-tripleo-overcloud-precise" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1319979 07:05:11 or bug 1316985 ? 07:05:12 Launchpad bug 1316985 in tripleo "set -eu may spuriously break dkms module" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1316985 07:05:13 tchaypo: I'm going to close it. We haven't hit it in a long time 07:05:48 for 1316985: waiting for the select-boot-kernel element to land... 07:05:54 GheRivero: woot, thanks 07:06:07 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98758/ 07:06:12 So that leaves 4 other criticals on -incubator and one on DIB that I can see 07:06:35 not terrible 07:06:44 Does anyone have any bugs they want to talk about? 07:07:36 I'm taking that as a no. 07:07:40 #topic reviews 07:07:44 #info There's a new dashboard linked from https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO#Review_team - look for "TripleO Inbox Dashboard" 07:07:47 #link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-openreviews.html 07:07:49 #link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt 07:07:51 #link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt 07:08:06 Looking at http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-openreviews.html 07:08:15 Stats since the last revision without -1 or -2 : 07:08:18 Average wait time: 8 days, 23 hours, 32 minutes 07:08:20 1st quartile wait time: 1 days, 12 hours, 33 minutes 07:08:22 Median wait time: 5 days, 23 hours, 56 minutes 07:08:24 3rd quartile wait time: 11 days, 21 hours, 38 minutes 07:08:38 It seems like the 3rd quartile hasn't changed much since last week, but the average is much higher than my memory 07:09:31 but http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2014/tripleo.2014-06-17-19.01.log.txt says my memory is wrong 07:10:00 vacation time starts, so it will get worse :-) 07:10:04 -2 days on 3q 07:10:08 which is good 07:10:20 #info 3rd quartile has dropped from 13 days 12 hours to 11 days 21 hours over the last week, other quartiles roughly unchanged 07:10:41 Have people been using the dashboard? 07:10:44 or gertty? 07:10:58 Also reviewing from longest waiting without -1 07:11:50 gertty! I'm loving it! 07:12:00 gerrty? I've missed what this is. 07:12:21 don't know gerrty too 07:12:25 yea I've been using the dashboard 07:12:30 stackforge/gertty 07:12:35 greghaynes: thanks 07:12:43 I have been using the dashboard tho', its nice. 07:12:50 damit... sorry am late 07:13:04 marios_: Where is your note? :-P 07:13:05 marios_: greetings! 07:13:30 morning all :) 07:13:36 I've been using gertty too 07:14:00 but unless we have anything else to note here, I'll move along 07:14:04 I haven't, I've been doing reviews with a bookmark I have. 07:14:41 #info stackforge/gertty is a tty-based locally-caching client for gerrit, so you can do reviews on a plane 07:14:57 so our efforts to clear older patches don't seem to have made much of a dent yet :( 07:15:25 any ideas? 07:15:54 marios_: we've dropped the 3rd quartile by about 1.5 days over the last week, even though many in the US are on vacation. 07:16:11 tchaypo: ah, i missed that bit, i thought it was much of the same 07:16:26 07:10 < greghaynes> -2 days on 3q 07:16:30 cool 07:16:31 the other quartiles are much the same :) 07:16:42 I think that suggest we've been hitting hardest on the oldest ones 07:17:44 I've been trying to do some reviews in projects/repos I'm less comfortable with, to try to learn something about those projects 07:18:20 #topic Projects needing releases 07:18:27 Do we have a volunteer? 07:18:58 StevenK: maybe we could bash this out together on friday? 07:19:10 tchaypo: Neither of us have the access to do so. 07:19:17 StevenK: then let's not 07:19:28 StevenK: what access? 07:19:30 What access is required? 07:19:36 i've never donw it before and am scared it would eat my week 07:19:50 marios_: my thoughts exactly :) 07:20:07 You need to be able to push signed tags, which requires you to be a member of the tripleo-ptl group on gerrit 07:20:18 and the members of that group are.. 07:20:18 where's rpodolyaka and jdob when you need them 07:20:27 I'll do it. Have access already 07:20:37 tchaypo: does that mean all cores? 07:20:43 shadower: or did you have to do something else? 07:20:49 It doesn't mean all cores 07:20:52 marios_: there's a different group for doing releases 07:21:03 #note shadower will release all the things 07:21:05 moving on 07:21:10 shadower: ah... will ask you after 07:21:15 List is https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/200,members 07:21:41 Does that command work? 07:21:46 #info shadower will release all the things 07:21:51 (sorry) 07:22:04 shadower: fyi https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/ReleaseManagement 07:22:12 It's going to be in the notes at least once now :) 07:22:18 marios_: I know, I've done a release before 07:22:24 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/ReleaseManagement 07:22:26 There's a dib-utils patch that should land before releasing 07:22:29 shadower: ah apologies :) 07:22:33 StevenK: link? 07:22:37 #topic CD Cloud status 07:22:56 shadower: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102291/ 07:23:04 thx 07:23:18 #info https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102291/ should land before releasing dif-utils 07:24:28 Do we have anyone who can talk about the CD cloud status? I have a feeling we don't have anyone in this timezone at the moment who knows the current state 07:25:11 derekh around? 07:25:19 no, seems. he sometimes is this time of day 07:25:29 he has PTO 07:25:33 ah 07:25:36 lazy 07:25:48 lol 07:26:06 I'm going to note that lifeless mentioned last week that https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1325114 was in the way, and that seems to be unresolved 07:26:08 Launchpad bug 1325114 in tripleo "can't deploy underclouds with VLAN API endpoints" [High,Triaged] 07:26:28 I believe ng has made some progress toward getting hp1 operation 07:27:24 and I believe jerryz is in the early stages of getting a third region for us, provided by huawei 07:28:04 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ci-hp1-rebuild still in progress 07:28:41 \o/ 07:29:05 #info quaoting lifeless from last week: please help with restoring vlan and public endpoint support so that we can get hp1.tripleo.orgback online and > double our CI capacity 07:29:09 Moving on... 07:29:25 #topic CI 07:29:29 #link http://goodsquishy.com/downloads/s_tripleo-jobs.html 07:30:20 We had some bad times with CI this week which clarkb was isntrumental in helping us get to the bottom of 07:30:47 I believe we still have a temprevert in tock_devtest.sh because of a commit in neutron 07:31:03 The revert to neutron hasn't landed? 07:31:42 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101395/ seems to have landed 07:31:51 #info so I think we can remove the temprevert now 07:32:30 #action tchaypo will prepare a patch to revert the temprevert 07:33:06 Anything else? 07:33:19 The summary on goodsquishy looks good, but I'd love if it went back further in time 07:33:48 tchaypo: You should talk to derekh about that. 07:34:22 StevenK: not while he's on PTO 07:34:38 Of course. There was an unspoken "when he's around" 07:34:39 #topic tuskar 07:35:29 guys the juno specs still need to land 07:35:39 this is a priority 07:35:40 sec 07:35:57 marios_: +1 07:36:03 https://review.openstack.org/94720 07:36:03 I was about to say... 07:36:11 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tripleo-specs,n,z 07:36:16 I should have another swing at that 07:36:17 https://review.openstack.org/97553 07:36:19 and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97553/ 07:36:25 #Info we still have several specs that need urgent attention 07:36:27 shadower: the mergepy one? 07:36:39 #link https://review.openstack.org/94720 07:36:42 (kinda relevant to tuskar as it will be a consumer right?) 07:36:49 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97553/ 07:36:49 #link https://review.openstack.org/97553 07:36:58 oops 07:37:11 heh 07:37:16 anyhow, we've mostly had red hat eyes on those so far 07:37:22 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97939/ 07:37:34 i think we've got them to a good state but would be best to get more eyes please. but time is critical 07:37:35 marios_: worth a mail to the list reminding people that we need to land these? 07:38:21 we got a new iteration on the tuscar one less than a day ago so it looks like its moving again 07:38:36 shadower: I think that's not related to tuskar 07:38:37 however 07:38:42 tchaypo: sure, i'll give it till this afternoon when jdob is around, i think he may have already pinged lifeless about them 07:38:45 i think we should add a "specs" section to the agenda 07:38:52 tchaypo: +1 07:38:57 tchaypo: iiuic, the tuskar specs kind of rely on it 07:39:13 I know the API spec does 07:39:25 +1 for specs in the agenda 07:40:04 #info tuskar API spec (at least, possibly other tuskar things) also depend on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97939/ 07:40:25 Do we have other notes about tuskar? 07:40:56 #topic one-off agenda items 07:41:16 #info For those attending the TripleO mid-cycle sprint in Raleigh, the hotel details have been posted to the etherpad 07:41:19 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-midcycle-meetup 07:41:34 yeah... so in the end I am not going to mid-cycle, fwiw 07:41:39 chmod 600 $TRIPLEO_ROOT/*-env.json 07:41:40 got approval yesterday, but after looking at flights so late now, I told my manager it really doesn't make sense :( 07:41:41 #info please make your booking ASAP, the group booking expires very very soon 07:41:56 you will have to wait till november to see my ugly mug. 07:42:00 greghaynes: can you hash-info that? 07:42:11 #info chmod 600 $TRIPLEO_ROOT/*-env.json 07:42:17 marios_: This is a sadness 07:42:23 tchaypo: lol. hang in there mate 07:42:25 greghaynes: could you explain why? :p 07:42:30 greghaynes: what is that? 07:42:44 Well, if you dont, youll find out why very quickly :p 07:42:49 marios_: maybe you could arrange a hangout for folks to see you before then ;) 07:43:01 d0ugal: mate, why would i want to do that to them? 07:43:06 Basically we need to enforce those permissions on that file because we are storing secrets there now 07:43:12 marios_: lol 07:43:31 that chane was merged recently... so if you dont then your devtest runs will fail 07:43:41 #info we need to enforce those permissions on that file because we are storing secrets there now. Scripts don't chown for you, they just abort. 07:44:16 chmod 07:44:21 chown changes ownership 07:44:24 #undo 07:44:25 Removing item from minutes: 07:44:37 #info we need to enforce those permissions on that file because we are storing secrets there now. Scripts don't chmod for you, they just abort 07:44:40 sigh 07:44:46 oh great, we got the object id. how useful! 07:44:52 Yeah 07:44:52 The thing I wanted to bring up is around under/overcloud password files. 07:45:02 greghaynes: __repr__ is hard, news at 11. 07:45:06 At present the scripts look for them in $PWD, then in $TRIPLEO_ROOT 07:45:15 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97657/ / https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93981/ are two patchsets open to change this 07:45:26 One of them is xuhaiwei_ 's 07:46:01 they both at the moment just check $TRIPLEO_ROOT, some people have suggested to xuhaiwei_ that we should accept a parameter for the location, which defaults to $TRIPLEO_ROOT 07:46:26 I think we should bring it up on the list 07:46:50 Because I'd also like input from sleeping people 07:47:09 Do we have any input from awake people first? 07:47:17 I've got an email drafted already 07:47:29 I'm happy enough to drop the $PWD check 07:47:47 Well, $CWD to be pedantic 07:49:36 Okay, no other comments,I'll take it to the list 07:49:42 Anything else? 07:50:06 StevenK: +1 to list 07:50:10 #topic open discussion 07:50:17 sorry, to what list? 07:50:26 xuhaiwei_: mailing list 07:50:28 xuhaiwei_: openstack-dev 07:50:31 ok 07:50:57 xuhaiwei_: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org [Tripleo] 07:51:02 tchaypo: Ten minute early mark? Sounds fantastic. /part 07:51:37 marios, StevenK: thanks 07:52:45 email sent 07:53:00 I'll close the meeting in 60 seconds if we don't have anything else.. 07:53:03 so fast 07:53:18 I say the mail *) 07:53:52 I wrote it yesterday, just had to hit send :) 07:54:21 #endmeeting