20:01:52 #startmeeting tripleo 20:01:53 Meeting started Mon May 27 20:01:52 2013 UTC. The chair is lifeless. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:01:54 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:01:56 The meeting name has been set to 'tripleo' 20:02:15 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TripleO 20:02:32 #topic bugs 20:02:55 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/ 20:04:11 Hi 20:04:15 hi 20:04:32 so - we have 9 criticals 20:04:38 because, we found out how broken things were :) 20:05:24 we need some volunteers to step up and hack 20:06:11 devananda: are we getting you good enough info with the bm specific bugs ? 20:06:40 lifeless: largely, yes. 20:06:57 * devananda looks for al ink 20:07:25 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1184445 20:07:27 Launchpad bug 1184445 in tripleo "deploy / delete fragility" [High,Triaged] 20:07:38 i posted a cmment there with several possibly-related-but-vague bugs 20:07:46 other than those, i think everything's been pretty clear 20:08:34 cool 20:08:52 the main themes I see are: 20:08:57 - broken trunks in other projects 20:09:09 - too much boot-stack-undercloud hardcoding in our elements (which we knew about) 20:09:15 - baremetal fragility 20:10:50 anything else to say on bugs? Anyone volunteering? 20:12:30 guess not :P 20:12:41 nothing more here. I fix 'em when I can :) 20:12:47 ok grizzly test rack POC status 20:13:01 we have a rack, with 21 compute nodes deployed via heat + nova bm 20:13:12 we've had to hand tune the control plane 20:13:17 and manually setup quantum 20:13:25 bugs filed on every manual step. 20:13:39 the 21 compute nodes though were fully automatic 20:13:45 once we got all the bugs hammered out 20:14:00 everyone say \\\o//// 20:14:21 lifeless, \\\o//// 20:14:21 we've found mores issues in heat - in particular the hostname issue 20:14:24 o/ 20:14:39 diskimage-builder needed a couple of tiny tweaks 20:15:01 lifeless, as far as volunteering https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1174149, can we talk later about it 20:15:02 Launchpad bug 1174149 in tripleo "VLANs for bare metal require manual configuration" [High,Triaged] 20:15:20 dkehn: yes, absolutely. 20:15:40 lifeless, I'm assuming this will be in the quantum area? 20:16:11 lifeless, once I get situated in Europe will ping for more info 20:17:35 yes 20:17:45 there's another quantum bug upcoming too 20:18:36 there's always another bug in quantum 20:18:50 ok 20:18:58 #topic Grizzly POC 20:18:59 see above 20:19:05 #topic open discussion 20:19:19 * lifeless opens it to the floor 20:19:31 BTM they want to disscuss another approach for the extra_dhcp_opts using the quantum meta server, or something will get more info in the next meeting 20:19:44 which could spell more delays 20:21:05 dkehn: any more info on that besides garyk's one comment on the review? 20:21:17 thats it 20:21:32 jsut concerned that these have a way of boiling over a bit 20:21:38 aye 20:21:48 i'll stick around for the quantum meeting and say some things 20:22:04 my position will be to got with what we have then deal with other needs as they arrive 20:22:09 "lets make this more general" is sometimes the right thing, but not always 20:22:12 cool 20:22:17 yeah 20:22:26 this is already super general. 20:22:31 arbitrary options. 20:22:31 I think its the right thing, but would like to get this moved on 20:22:39 oh god please yes. 20:22:39 no kidding 20:22:49 whats the review url for it ? 20:22:51 "This could be useful for all" (quote from his comment) 20:22:58 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30441/ 20:23:00 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30447/ 20:23:04 erm 20:23:10 worng 20:23:23 it's 30441 20:23:27 devananda, right https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30441/ 20:23:33 me wrong 20:23:48 the 30447 is the client 20:23:59 python-quantumclient 20:24:02 sorry 20:25:24 i dont see dhcpopts on the agenda? 20:25:46 for quantum meeting 20:25:48 ? 20:25:50 right 20:26:21 probably not, so two approachs, be quiet it goes away, bring it up and god save us 20:26:42 um, it's not going away. this needs to get resolved, so i'm going to bring it up, i guess 20:26:46 I'm wondering if gary will bring it up 20:26:48 lifeless: unless you want to? 20:27:22 I can bring it up, during the open discussion I guess 20:27:28 my thingy 20:27:55 devananda: you already have the discussion open with him 20:28:14 devananda: I would say 'dhcp options are generic but specific; hiding them in a metadata thing adds no value 20:28:22 devananda: which I think is roughly what you already said 20:28:31 ack 20:28:32 back in a sec 20:28:56 In addition, if they get more completicated, whcih they are not now, they won't get used 20:33:11 right 20:33:47 so key points: DHCP options are highly relevant to ports; no reason to hide it away. Doesn't stop a generic 'metadata' thing later, if that is considered a good idea. 20:34:06 that how I see it 20:34:34 moving forward does preclude the metadata thing 20:35:24 dkehn: does? or does not? 20:35:40 doesn't sorry 20:35:45 does not 20:36:26 once this portion complete, we can move on the metadata, which will require some understanding 20:36:48 yeah; personally I'm skeptical of generic things 20:37:07 because you still need reliability and predictable locations - a well known path - for clients to be written 20:37:13 overly generic is death to APIs 20:40:13 ok 20:40:17 it seems like we're done. 20:40:22 Last call for topics 20:41:16 #endmeeting