16:59:58 #startmeeting training-manuals 16:59:59 Meeting started Mon Aug 4 16:59:58 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sarob. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:02 The meeting name has been set to 'training_manuals' 17:00:09 roll call! 17:00:16 hey 17:00:48 rolu: new handle, eh? 17:00:54 hey 17:01:12 sarob: yeah, per accident :) 17:01:15 very slimming, ;) 17:01:35 rolu sounds pretty cool, i like it 17:02:14 any of our new friends from symantec, ibm, or intel joining us? 17:02:20 or HP? 17:02:50 how about our friends from comcast? 17:03:01 Hi, I'm here 17:03:11 Shilla is still out and Scott is in training 17:03:15 meganr: morning! 17:03:28 Good morning! 17:03:40 or afternoon 17:03:45 good morning 17:03:50 or evening, as the case may be 17:04:12 so i wanted to discuss briefly the idea of mentoring that has been making the rounds 17:04:23 reed are you with us? 17:04:37 no matter 17:05:08 i have been getting alot of interest from different groups about joining congress and training 17:05:20 im sure the same is for other projects as well 17:05:39 we have been partially focusing on new contributors 17:05:47 getting them into the openstack way 17:06:14 i think we need to think about working with the foundation on a mentoring program 17:06:35 a few of us might have the time to be a mentor 17:06:41 but im thinking for our team 17:06:56 sarob: we have OPW and GSoc and also there is openSUSE internship program 17:07:16 that we can help with some kind of pair programming ideas for getting in the openstack way 17:07:26 too early for me to say but I can try to put this up across SUSE and openSUSE community once I get some clarity there 17:07:54 dbite: so we can coop their work? 17:08:48 i dont want us to travel some new direction 17:09:03 rather if we can help ourselves 17:09:11 mostly we try to push our content 17:09:19 and get people to use it for official programs 17:09:33 that could be good start 17:09:33 with mentoring a new contributor from intel or hp or the like 17:10:18 i can line up a new person with our training materials and a live person to hand hold them for a bit 17:10:44 i can ask reed to help us with finding the warm bodies 17:10:53 ok 17:11:12 does this make any sense, or too much coffee for sarob? 17:11:16 hi all 17:11:25 matjazp: hello 17:11:25 sorry I'm late 17:11:26 matjazp: evening! 17:11:29 sarob: makes sense 17:11:36 but how much help should be given? 17:11:48 most of the things are up there on the wiki and are in pretty good shape 17:12:10 dbite: the foundation and some others have been discussing mentoring 17:12:42 dbite: give a bit of thought of what materials would be useful to start 17:12:55 dbite: its all of our stuff 17:13:10 hmm, mentoring for new contributors you mean 17:13:15 dbite: right 17:13:17 or for the training them for OpenStack? 17:13:19 ok 17:13:29 I dont mind that, which projects are you talking about? 17:13:52 dbite: if i was to write up a wiki page for a user group mentor, what would i tell them and steps 17:14:13 dbite: think of it this way 17:14:35 intel is interested in getting a developer to help us with the training-guides 17:14:41 awesome right? 17:14:56 awesome news 17:14:59 but i need to hand hold this new person 17:15:12 the wiki page should contain links to other getting started wikis and docs 17:15:16 a bit of introduction 17:15:22 on why we need to follow these links 17:15:31 sarob: cool... it's one developer, or plural... developers? :) 17:15:32 so i am going to make a date and time to walk them through getting started 17:15:36 various procedures and may be showcase IRC stuff 17:15:49 dbite, matjazp: exactly 17:16:01 sure, sounds good 17:16:08 so i am going to do it. i should write it down 17:16:24 so other mentors can follow and improve 17:16:32 yeah, just share the WIKI page with us so that we can pitch in 17:16:37 yeah 17:16:45 coolo 17:17:14 i want to get the managers attention from these interested companies 17:17:21 and then set the hook 17:17:34 this wiki page? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Training-guides 17:17:43 for the developer to be part of openstack 17:18:11 reed: thats more for training project's contributors 17:18:15 reed: i will probably set the page there eventually 17:18:34 reed: i will start with wiki page for right now 17:18:46 reed: we have lots of good info 17:18:57 ok, I was just checking since there are lots of moving parts 17:19:04 I myself get confused 17:19:11 reed: i want to create a mentor/trainer starting place 17:19:28 sarob, there should already be a random page 17:19:29 reed: we are very, very close to that 17:19:32 let me pull it 17:20:05 reed: i will training this new intel dev and write down what i do 17:20:16 reed: train that is 17:20:28 sorry to sidetrack us folks 17:20:55 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mentors 17:21:07 i want to build the depth of this team, and this seems like a way to do it 17:22:12 the Mentors on that page responded to a call on the dev list recently, a request to help new contributors get their patches accepted faster 17:22:12 reed: after i write up my notes, you want me to link to the mentor page? 17:22:54 sarob, can you expand a bit about what your notes are about? 17:23:18 sarob: the idea of mentors getting the newbie's patches in faster is really nice 17:23:41 I think that should cushion their fall 17:23:43 a bit 17:24:30 reed: i am going to train a new intel dev becoming a new contributor to openstack 17:24:35 dbite, there was recently a conversation about this topic on the dev list, a couple of tasks also generated from that 17:24:59 reed: ok, sorry I must have missed that 17:25:30 reed: the tasks, can we create a community blueprint with tasks for mentoring? 17:25:43 sarob, cool... using the training material? 17:25:53 reed: or storyboard even better 17:26:01 reed: yup 17:26:33 sarob, not worth creating blueprints honestly, it takes longer to create a bp than to act on them :) 17:26:35 it is a good idea to put it under training guides 17:26:54 the tasks are just to collect the couple questions and answers raised on the mlist and put them on Ask 17:27:11 sarob: can we use storyboard? Isn't that only in plans for fall? 17:27:40 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-February/026931.html 17:28:16 #note check Open Hatch as a resource to collaborate too 17:28:47 matjazp_, storyboard is still in heavy development, and it may break 17:29:10 reed: it seems to be broken right now :/ 17:29:26 matjazp_, a decision to use it (or not) should be made after talking to its developers 17:29:31 sarob, indeed :) 17:30:23 reed: yup, i know, that is why I asked... maybe we should use bp's untill its stable 17:30:24 that would be me :) 17:30:30 okay, well i dont want to get sidetracked more here 17:30:42 krotscheck: hello 17:31:13 krotscheck: has rightfully warned me off using storyboard until it is ready for production 17:31:57 reed: i will write up my trainer notes and we can go from there of how to build on them 17:32:52 lets get back to the regularly scheduled program 17:33:36 #action sarob will train a new dev from intel this week and post the trainer notes as a start for mentoring 17:33:55 #topic stable docs team update 17:34:26 1. so stable team should be renamed 17:35:08 I think we agreed to call it simply docs team 17:35:13 or training docs team 17:35:17 weren't we supposed to have an email discussion on that? 17:35:34 ML discussion, actually. 17:35:34 rolu: yes, my bad. I got too busy last week 17:36:08 sarob, what's epiclisde? 17:36:09 dbite: we can vote now, if you would like? 17:36:24 dbite: ah right, the new name idea is "training docs" instead of stable 17:36:28 I think so, I mean it does not affect other projects 17:36:35 so putting it up on ML may be over kill IMHO 17:36:50 matjazp_: yes, should we vote on this rite now? 17:36:58 okay we can vote 17:37:11 so I propose training docs for stable content 17:37:45 dbite: what would be the name for old "development"? 17:37:50 dbite: "training docs" as the new name for the "stable" training team? 17:38:09 sarob: yes 17:38:17 #startvote rename the "stable" training team to "training docs" 17:38:18 rolu: may be draft or current 17:38:19 Unable to parse vote topic and options. 17:38:31 +1 17:38:51 #startvote rename the stable training team to training docs 17:38:52 Unable to parse vote topic and options. 17:38:52 I think startvote command failed 17:39:07 dbite: :/ 17:39:22 #startvote "rename the stable training team to training docs" 17:39:23 Unable to parse vote topic and options. 17:39:29 sarob: :| 17:39:37 :D 17:39:39 whatever 17:39:54 lets just say +1 or -1 17:39:55 for now 17:39:57 vote with +/- my friends 17:40:04 dbite right 17:40:05 and add it as a an action item 17:40:06 #action we should look into this #voting stuff on irc :) 17:40:06 +1 17:40:13 +1 17:40:15 +1 17:40:17 +1 17:40:17 +1 17:40:28 moost excceeelent 17:40:37 +5 to 0 17:40:46 then its decided 17:41:10 dbite: can you update the training guides wiki? 17:41:11 #startvote rename the stable training team to training docs? Yes, No, Maybe 17:41:24 that syntax should do it. 17:41:27 #link http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot 17:41:30 #startvote rename the stable training team to training docs? Yes, No, Maybe 17:41:31 Begin voting on: rename the stable training team to training docs? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Maybe. 17:41:32 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:41:38 yes 17:41:41 #vote Yes 17:41:45 #vote Yes 17:41:48 #vote yes 17:41:53 #vote Yes 17:41:56 #vote yes 17:42:45 #endvote 17:42:46 Voted on "rename the stable training team to training docs?" Results are 17:42:47 Yes (5): sarob, MeganR, rolu, matjazp_, dbite 17:42:56 super awesome 17:43:26 what else my friend? 17:43:28 move on? 17:43:53 we have renamed most of the XML files for stable content and nearly done with cleaning up of filenames 17:44:09 I want some clarification on release tracking 17:44:20 when to create git version tags 17:46:18 annegentle: when do we want to create git version tags? 17:47:11 dbite: more specifically when can we publish to icehouse? 17:47:45 sarob: yeah, so we create Icehouse tag and start with Juno 17:48:01 dbite: annegentle is offline right now 17:48:06 I need some help intially with this 17:48:24 ok, I will initiate a conv. later 17:48:32 dbite: lets discuss with doc channel and ml 17:48:52 #action dbite, ask for git version tags to Manuals PTL and core team 17:48:57 dbite: so we can coordinate with the broader team 17:48:59 shouldn't we use branches rather than tags? 17:49:17 my bad, by tags I mean branches and tags 17:49:36 dbite: ah, okay :) 17:49:39 rolu: ah right i was lost there for a bit 17:49:39 rolu: tags are used for a stable release like RC1 etc. if I am not wrong 17:49:55 tags are just labels. 17:50:05 yes 17:50:08 but if you want to go back and fix something in icehouse, you need branches. 17:50:15 rolu: during build we use tags 17:50:39 I think we should move on to other teams, we have limited time 17:50:46 dbite: we will need to get a bit a planning around cherrypicking 17:51:07 sarob: yes, that sounds like a discussion for the Summit 17:51:14 #action dbite: cherrypicking plan 17:51:49 #topic any other business since i took up all the time in the beginning of the meeting 17:52:11 matjazp or rolu? 17:52:37 sarob: I updated wiki a bit. I decided to go with bugs, not bp's 17:52:45 sarob: scripts are not as far along as I would like, but we are making progress. 17:53:22 as a get new people, do either of you want me to send me your way? 17:53:35 send you one i mean 17:53:46 sarob: sure 17:54:01 sarob: in future, right now its not possible for me 17:54:17 rolu? 17:54:40 depends on what you expect from my side. we are stretched thin in labs scripts. 17:54:43 rolu: it would be good if you can take up mentoring someone for the labs section 17:55:15 sarob: but to write questions/quizzes you need to know Openstack 17:55:16 we could do with some help, I had a trivial patch more then 4 days in the review queue with no takers. 17:55:39 are they "fresh" on OS? 17:55:44 #action sarob send new training help to testing and infra teams 17:56:00 rolu: patches will more in faster now 17:56:12 matjazp_: these are people with python experience 17:56:14 yeah, now that you are back :). 17:56:34 by the way, I almost forgot, me and a rally core recently took a openstack Developer 101 17:56:41 in one of the local university in India 17:56:47 i have been massively distracted 17:56:52 rolu: I'm still on vacation.. but I have more regular internet access now.. 17:57:12 dbite: like attended a class or ran it? 17:57:14 matjazp_: dont worry much about reviews, I will cover them till the next week or two 17:57:16 dbite, interesting... who was the teacher? 17:57:23 sarob: ran it ofcourse ;D 17:57:34 oh 17:57:41 dbite: awesome, blog it ! 17:57:55 my bad, should have phrased it a bit better 17:57:58 I second that, dbite, write about it :) 17:58:03 dbite: you can use mine if you need a place to write it up 17:58:13 yes, I will 17:58:20 or use wordpress online 17:58:26 cool 17:58:30 I have my blog 17:58:39 http://dguitarbite.wordpress.com/ 17:58:40 :( didnt know 17:58:49 sarob: nps :) 17:58:51 dbite, is it on planet.openstack.org? 17:59:00 its on my list now 17:59:09 almost done here 17:59:16 sarob: what's with Upstream univ review? 17:59:18 reed: not yet, I post some personal weird stuff there too, I wil lcreate another one for planet soon 17:59:32 guys lets switch over to docs channel 17:59:46 majazp_ docs channel right 18:00:02 goodbye my friends until next week! 18:00:08 bye 18:00:08 bye 18:00:10 bye 18:00:11 bye 18:00:13 bye 18:00:20 #endmeeting