15:11:40 <anteaya> #startmeeting third-party
15:11:40 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Aug 15 15:11:40 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is anteaya. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:11:41 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:11:43 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'third_party'
15:11:58 <anteaya> sorry for being late
15:12:15 <anteaya> I was looking at the time and thought, sure I have time to look at just this one patch
15:12:19 <anteaya> sorry sorry
15:12:23 <asselin> good morning
15:12:28 <anteaya> anyone want to talk about third party things?
15:12:31 <anteaya> morning asselin
15:13:07 <anteaya> thanks for getting my attention lennyb :)
15:13:32 <lennyb> yeap, is someone  is cjecking stable/mitaka ? I have some issues
15:13:47 <anteaya> what issues?
15:14:49 <lennyb> #link http://paste.openstack.org/show/557586/
15:15:49 <anteaya> is this a log from a failed job?
15:15:54 <lennyb> full log #link http://13.69.151.247/Nova-ML2-Sriov/5408_cloudx-23/console.html.gz
15:16:23 <lennyb> anteaya: yeap
15:16:50 <anteaya> looks like it was running tempest?
15:17:02 <anteaya> that is a large log
15:17:16 <lennyb> anteaya: yeap #link http://13.69.151.247/Nova-ML2-Sriov/5408_cloudx-23/testr_results.html.gz
15:18:52 <anteaya> my browser is doing strange things
15:19:12 <lennyb> it looks like urrlib3 issue. I've got some tips from wznoinsk, but did not have time to review them. it was not working from the first run #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352884/
15:19:18 <anteaya> firefox is just showing me the content of the tab on either side of that log, rather than the log
15:19:26 <anteaya> I've never seen that before
15:19:39 <lennyb> anteaya: surprise :)
15:19:58 <anteaya> every day is a brand new day
15:20:05 <lennyb> anteaya: tempest results show same error , dont need to open console
15:20:29 <anteaya> thanks
15:20:41 <anteaya> are the cis that are passing on that patch running that same test?
15:20:45 <anteaya> or are they skipping it?
15:21:08 <lennyb> I made a workaround with updating urllib3 after installing devstack but this is not a good workaround
15:21:46 <lennyb> wznoinsk said he had the same key error, not sure about the test
15:21:50 * lennyb cheking
15:22:46 <anteaya> I'm curious as to why your ci is failing as are two others yet 3 are passing
15:23:34 <lennyb> anteaya: thier test was skipped #link http://intel-openstack-ci-logs.ovh/84/352884/1/check/tempest-dsvm-full-nfv/73758e9/testr_results.html.gz
15:23:47 <anteaya> okay
15:24:01 <anteaya> so the passing systems are passing because they are not running that test?
15:24:10 <anteaya> and the failing systems are all failing on that test?
15:24:15 <anteaya> is that an accurate conclusion?
15:25:35 <lennyb> tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops/me cheking. slow connection
15:25:40 <anteaya> yup
15:26:15 <anteaya> but if you can confirm the cis that are passing are not running the test, and the cis that are failing are all failing on that test, that is information worth sharing to both the nova and qa teams
15:26:18 <anteaya> in my opinion
15:26:39 <anteaya> and that would be the ci systems working as expected
15:27:14 <lennyb> anteaya: ok.
15:27:43 <anteaya> would you agree?
15:28:22 <lennyb> anteaya:yep, I  will recheck it and share the info.
15:29:08 <lennyb> Is anaone here runs a daily runon all stable branches
15:29:09 <lennyb> ?
15:29:26 <anteaya> wonderful thank you, and good find
15:29:47 <anteaya> you might want to ask that some question on the mailing list
15:30:00 <anteaya> there might be third party ci operators that do but aren't in this meeting
15:30:24 <lennyb> sure
15:30:28 <anteaya> thanks
15:30:33 <anteaya> and good work here
15:30:49 <lennyb> 10x
15:31:00 <anteaya> nicely done mellanox team
15:31:15 <anteaya> yeah, that log was so long
15:31:22 <anteaya> my browser just gave up
15:31:38 <anteaya> and rendered content from its neighbouring tab
15:31:43 <anteaya> that's a new one for me
15:32:13 <anteaya> any more on this topic?
15:32:35 * lennyb done with the opic
15:32:50 <anteaya> thank you
15:33:01 <anteaya> does anyone have anything else they would like to discuss today?
15:33:32 <lennyb> yeap
15:33:59 <anteaya> go ahead
15:34:45 <lennyb> what is the best approach to set node lables if I have different jobs that can run on different nics/networks?
15:35:39 <anteaya> have you taken a look at what infra does?
15:35:47 <lennyb> nope
15:35:53 <anteaya> in project-config/jenkins/jobs/projects.yaml
15:35:59 <anteaya> and zuul/layout.yaml
15:36:07 <lennyb> thanks, will check it
15:36:14 <anteaya> take a look at how centos ubuntu and xenial get set
15:36:25 <anteaya> then have a chat with folks working on zuul v3
15:36:38 <anteaya> as I think node label yaml might be changing
15:36:48 <anteaya> but get a sense of what infra is doing currently first
15:37:04 <anteaya> anyone else have any thoughts in response to this question?
15:38:36 <anteaya> any more on this topic?
15:39:24 * lennyb done
15:40:56 <anteaya> thank you lennyb
15:41:07 <anteaya> is there any other topic anyone would like to discuss
15:42:37 <wznoinsk> nothing from me
15:43:43 <anteaya> thank you
15:43:51 <anteaya> any objection to me closing the meeting?
15:44:25 <anteaya> thank you all for attending
15:44:35 <anteaya> see you all next week
15:44:39 <anteaya> #endmeeting