15:00:16 <anteaya> #startmeeting third-party
15:00:17 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Mar 21 15:00:16 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is anteaya. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:18 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:21 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'third_party'
15:00:25 <anteaya> hello
15:00:27 <mmedvede> o/
15:00:35 <anteaya> how are you today?
15:00:42 <boris-42> see you next week
15:00:51 <mmedvede> hi anteaya, I am great. yourself?
15:01:16 <anteaya> good thanks
15:01:17 <lennyb> hi
15:01:21 <anteaya> hey lennyb
15:01:37 <anteaya> does anyone have anything they wish to discuss today?
15:01:49 <anteaya> we have all read the gerrit ip change coming up, yes?
15:01:59 <lennyb> I have a tempest related question.
15:02:13 <anteaya> lennyb: go ahead
15:02:31 <lennyb> I need to run tempest with ironic-api version 1.17. how can I technically do it?
15:02:45 <anteaya> good question
15:03:02 <anteaya> I would ask in the ironic channel to begin
15:03:22 <anteaya> as they may have a current test setup that you could follow
15:03:31 <anteaya> does that sound reasonable?
15:03:45 <lennyb> I believe that it's related to rest client ( which is tempest ) and not ironic. Ironic supports min and max versions
15:04:25 <anteaya> do you think it is possible that ironic also might be running tempest tests?
15:05:34 <devananda> lennyb: I'm curious, what is it you're trying to test by sending x-openstack-ironic-api-version 1.17?
15:05:50 <lennyb> ironic has tempest plugin, I am running it, but it uses minimal rest version. I wander if I can set it manually. I will definitely ask them ( again ).
15:06:08 <lennyb> devananda: where can I define it?
15:06:23 <anteaya> lennyb: okay if you have asked them and you don't get a reply then do let us know
15:06:37 <anteaya> it is possible that devananda is not online at present
15:06:52 <lennyb> devananda: I can hardcode it in the ironic versions file, but I want to do it dynamically
15:06:55 <anteaya> I'd suggest taking the question to the channel for a discussion there
15:07:09 <lennyb> anteaya: ok, thanks
15:07:31 <anteaya> thank you
15:08:32 <anteaya> oh here is devananda, sorry my client missed his input at first
15:08:50 <devananda> anteaya: hi :)
15:08:55 <anteaya> so do we want to continue discussing this here?
15:08:59 <anteaya> I'm fine if we do
15:09:02 <anteaya> devananda: hi there
15:09:07 <devananda> lennyb, anteaya: the current Ironic API version is 1.16. So while this is an interesting question, I do not see how testing ironic with an api version that is higher than trunk is related to third-party CI.
15:10:08 <lennyb> devananda: I am running tests against an unmerged patch
15:10:14 <devananda> lennyb: ah
15:10:41 <devananda> anteaya: is that ^ normally the purpose of third-party CI?
15:11:11 <lennyb> jroll is working on this #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/260358/
15:11:17 <anteaya> well running tests on a patch that gerrit knows about before it is merged to master if fine as far as I am concerned
15:11:26 <devananda> ok
15:11:32 <anteaya> as that is the same scenario as infra testing
15:11:44 <anteaya> and actually is our preferred course of action
15:12:19 <anteaya> lennyb: so this is a question about testing a specific patch?
15:12:31 <jroll> to be clear, I'm not working on that, the ironic team is :)
15:12:53 <anteaya> jroll: thank you, yes didn't see you as the author/owner of that patch
15:13:07 <anteaya> lennyb: are you asking about how to test a specific patch?
15:13:20 <lennyb> anteaya: this is a question regarding use of tempest and API version ( specific for ironic ).
15:14:03 <anteaya> devananda jroll do you want to continue here or move the discussion to your channel?
15:14:06 <lennyb> jroll: sorry, for missing this detail :)
15:14:16 <jroll> anteaya: I'm not sure what more there is to discuss :)
15:14:17 <anteaya> I'm feeling this is specific to ironic
15:14:22 <anteaya> jroll: okay
15:14:25 <jroll> yes, I agree with that
15:14:31 <anteaya> lennyb: do you have the answer you need?
15:14:37 <lennyb> yeap/
15:14:44 <anteaya> okay good
15:14:59 <anteaya> does anyone object to moving on to a new topic?
15:15:14 <anteaya> okay moving on
15:15:18 <anteaya> I have a question
15:15:23 <anteaya> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2016-March/004031.html
15:15:33 <anteaya> so this email talked about disabling an account
15:15:39 <anteaya> mmedvede: you posted a reply
15:15:43 <mmedvede> anteaya: I have responded
15:15:44 <mmedvede> yes
15:15:53 <anteaya> is the person asking for their system to be disabled the account owner?
15:15:53 <mmedvede> #link #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2016-March/004033.html
15:16:01 <anteaya> mmedvede: thanks for replying :)
15:16:17 <mmedvede> anteaya: I am not sure, I think they did inherit the CI
15:16:22 <anteaya> ah
15:16:43 <anteaya> and they can't turn it off from their end?
15:16:51 <mmedvede> so I suggested to flush public ssh keys if they have access to the account
15:17:14 <mmedvede> anteaya: to me it looks like there might be a zuul server that they do not have access too
15:17:16 <mmedvede> *to
15:17:31 <anteaya> but the zuul server is on their end
15:17:35 <mmedvede> yes
15:17:38 <anteaya> okay great
15:17:47 <anteaya> this was very confusing for me
15:17:53 <anteaya> thanks for your help to sort this out
15:18:04 <anteaya> okay I will request the account be disabled
15:18:13 <anteaya> thanks for helping to figure out what is going on here
15:18:17 <anteaya> I appreciate it :)
15:18:31 <anteaya> does anyone have a next topic?
15:18:53 <anteaya> does anyone object to me closing the meeting?
15:19:22 <anteaya> thanks everyone for your kind attendance and participation today
15:19:27 <mmedvede> anteaya: thank you
15:19:30 <anteaya> enjoy the rest of the day/evening
15:19:33 <anteaya> see you next week
15:19:37 <anteaya> mmedvede: :)
15:19:42 <anteaya> #endmeeting