15:00:05 #startmeeting third-party 15:00:06 Meeting started Mon Jan 4 15:00:05 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is anteaya. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:09 The meeting name has been set to 'third_party' 15:00:12 hello 15:00:15 happy new year 15:00:15 hi 15:00:20 hi lennyb_ 15:00:20 happy new year 15:00:28 asselin_: happy new year 15:00:34 happy new year 15:00:55 does anyone have anything the would like to discuss today? 15:01:00 they 15:01:27 I don't have anything today 15:01:55 does anyone know if nodepool supports ironic? 15:02:06 I do not know 15:02:26 mordred may know 15:02:38 mordred: do you know if nodepool supports ironic? 15:03:27 he might not be online right now 15:04:05 asselin_: regarding your comment on #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259083 currently gerrit responce does not have field 'name', so if I will find a way to get it I will definitely add support for account_id and name as you suggested 15:04:57 lennyb_, the new gerrit version doesn't have it, but the previous one does right? 15:05:02 yes 15:05:22 or at least looks like it did 15:05:46 I guess I wonder if we should support the previous version of gerrit as well.... 15:06:19 aroo? 15:06:37 mordred: hi 15:06:44 oh - do you mean "does nodepool support booting nodes using ironic" ? 15:06:45 hi mordred, do you know if nodepool supports ironic? 15:07:01 yes, to access bare metal noes 15:07:03 nodes* 15:07:21 no, and it shoud not support that. ironic is not an end-user api. nodepool should use nova with the ironic driver to boot bare metal nodes 15:07:32 HOWEVER 15:07:58 the changes we're planning to nodepool for zuul v3 should allow for registration of long-lived bare metal nodes with nodepool 15:07:59 #link nodepool ironic ref: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259245/2/doc/source/third_party_ci.rst 15:08:05 asselin_: I dont know if we need to. Is it likely that we will decrease gerrit version or this monitoring tool will be used for other projects? 15:08:35 lennyb_: the monitoring tool may be used by other people on their own gerrit instance 15:09:07 mordred, thanks, that answers the question. I'll update the docs with that. 15:09:09 anteaya: In this case I will add support for both name or account_id 15:09:21 asselin_: woot! 15:09:52 lennyb_: I think that was what asselin_ was asking for and I think it makes sense if it is possible to do 15:09:59 lennyb_, anteaya yes that's the concern I was bringing up 15:10:22 ok, I see and agree with your point 15:10:35 asselin_: thanks for sharing that concern, having flexible tools increases their use 15:11:01 asselin_: did you get what you needed from mordred? 15:11:08 yes 15:11:12 wonderful 15:11:15 mordred: thank you 15:11:40 I feel we are off to such a productive start to the year 15:11:42 feels nice 15:11:43 anteaya: do you know who might help me with building correct rest query to gerrit? 15:11:54 lennyb_: I recommend zaro 15:12:22 anteaya: thanks. I will try to catch him again 15:12:37 yup, it is worth the effort 15:12:57 zaro: lennyb_ is looking forward to your review of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259083/3 when you get a chance 15:14:07 do we have anything else to discuss today? 15:14:32 \o/ 15:14:47 lennyb_, it seems the query is the same 15:15:18 lennyb_, just line 55 needs to be adjusted based on the response of the query 15:15:42 asselin_: it does not have 'name' in 'owner' field, only account_id. This was the reason for exception after Gerrit upgrade 15:17:38 lennyb_, i'll have to take a closer look. we can take it offline 15:18:10 anteaya: thanks. 15:18:22 asselin_: great, thanks. 15:18:30 seems we have discussed the items we said we wanted to 15:18:38 do we have anything more to discuss today? 15:19:01 any objection to me closing the meeting? 15:19:14 no 15:19:18 wonderful 15:19:19 no 15:19:20 no objection 15:19:29 thank you all for your attendance and participation 15:19:32 see you next week 15:19:36 #endmeeting