15:00:02 <anteaya> #startmeeting third-party
15:00:03 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Nov  2 15:00:02 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is anteaya. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:04 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:07 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'third_party'
15:00:12 <anteaya> hello
15:00:32 <mmedvede> hi anteaya
15:00:41 <mmedvede> how was the summit?
15:00:44 <anteaya> how are you mmedvede
15:00:47 <anteaya> good, busy
15:00:51 <mmedvede> I am good, thanks
15:00:55 <anteaya> great
15:01:02 <lennyb> Hi anteaya, mmedvede
15:01:09 <anteaya> thanks for taking the meeting the monday before summit, I appreciate it
15:01:12 <anteaya> hi lennyb
15:01:40 <mmedvede> anteaya: you're welcome
15:01:52 <anteaya> what shall we discuss today?
15:02:20 <lennyb> anteaya: I have nothing interesting
15:02:36 <anteaya> lennyb: okay, thanks for letting us know
15:02:44 <anteaya> mmedvede: anything new from your side?
15:03:14 <mmedvede> no, nothing from me
15:03:20 <anteaya> okay
15:03:21 <lennyb> mmedvede: are you testing stable/liberty?
15:04:04 <mmedvede> lennyb: I think we should be. I need to make sure, thanks for reminder
15:04:20 <mmedvede> lennyb: did you see any problems with stable/liberty?
15:04:22 <lennyb> it fails for us due to tempest-lib version. I've posted a patch #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240875/ but I wander if it's only me fails on those things
15:04:49 <anteaya> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240875/
15:06:13 <anteaya> lennyb: thanks for mentioning it
15:06:17 <eantyshev> Hello, sorry for being late
15:06:24 <anteaya> eantyshev: hello
15:06:27 <anteaya> nice to see you
15:06:31 <mmedvede> lennyb: on a quick check, I can see that our CI (IBM PowerKVM CI) has passed one of stable/liberty patches on nova https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237411/
15:06:38 <lennyb> mmedvede: we are removing all the tests-requirements each time, maybe this is the reason for those issues for us
15:06:52 <eantyshev> anteaya: thanks!
15:07:20 <mmedvede> lennyb: very well may be. We had problems with requirements, but managed to fix it, and try to stick with what upstream uses
15:07:33 <anteaya> lennyb: what do you mean you are removing the requirements each time?
15:07:45 <anteaya> lennyb: why are you doing that?
15:08:10 <lennyb> anteaya: to do a 'clean' run
15:08:48 <lennyb> #paste http://paste.openstack.org/show/477796/
15:09:51 <lennyb> anteaya: and to find bugs of course
15:09:57 <anteaya> lennyb: are you not using a fresh node each test run?
15:10:43 <lennyb> anteaya: no, we have OFED configurations, so we are removing devstack only
15:11:05 <anteaya> what is OFED?
15:11:26 <lennyb> anteaya: OpenFabric Infiniband Networking configuration
15:11:53 <lennyb> anteaya: we are configuring our HW
15:12:00 <anteaya> why does that prevent you from spinning up a new node?
15:12:34 <lennyb> anteaya: overhead of installing new OS. We cant do it on VM
15:12:59 <anteaya> lennyb: do you logs state that this is your testing environment?
15:13:31 <lennyb> anteaya: what do you mean?
15:14:00 <anteaya> in the logs for your tests, do you inform consumers of your logs that this is your testing environment?
15:15:45 <lennyb> anteaya: I guess in the wiki page
15:16:42 <anteaya> lennyb: what is the name of your system again? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems
15:16:52 <lennyb> #link anteaya: those who are interested in Mellanox products
15:17:05 <lennyb> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/Mellanox_CI
15:18:04 <anteaya> I don't see the place in the wikipage where you inform folks that you reuse your node
15:18:33 <lennyb> anteaya: did not think it should be there. I will add it shortly
15:18:45 <anteaya> okay thanks lennyb
15:19:06 <anteaya> yes any configuration that diverts from what openstack's infra testing does should be noted
15:19:26 <anteaya> as folks consuming your logs don't have any other way of knowing this
15:19:28 <anteaya> thank you
15:19:34 <mmedvede> to be fair, I do not think ours explicitly mentions that we use single use slaves, I guess it is assumed
15:19:37 <anteaya> anything else on this topic?
15:19:59 <anteaya> mmedvede: well yes, I do assume single use nodes
15:20:09 <anteaya> mmedvede: but it is always good to be explict
15:20:20 <anteaya> I didn't know folks were re-using nodes
15:20:31 <anteaya> so that kind of caught me by surprise
15:20:45 <anteaya> so telling people what you are doing is really helpful
15:21:12 <anteaya> anything else on this topic?
15:22:35 <anteaya> does anyone else have anything they would like to discuss?
15:23:56 <anteaya> does anyone have any objection to me closing the meeting?
15:24:46 <anteaya> thanks everyone for your attendance and participation
15:24:51 <anteaya> see you next week
15:24:54 <anteaya> #endmeeting