17:00:42 #startmeeting third-party 17:00:43 Meeting started Tue Sep 15 17:00:42 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is asselin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:44 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:47 The meeting name has been set to 'third_party' 17:01:44 anyone here for third party working group meeting? 17:01:56 hi rami 17:02:05 \o 17:02:05 hi ja2 17:02:09 hi sweston 17:02:18 asselin: hi! 17:02:55 patrickeast you around? 17:03:46 #link agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty#Agenda_for_next_Working_Group_meeting 17:04:08 #topic announcements 17:04:27 #link Upcoming backwards incompatible nodepool change: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2015-September/003185.html 17:05:03 in case you missed it in the mailing list nodepool is going to be updated as part of the move to common-ci 17:05:13 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189762/ 17:05:23 reading that email, "going to be" happened yesterday 17:06:02 ja2, well it didn't merge yet....but it should in the near future 17:06:29 this was based on discussion in yesterday's third party meeting 17:06:39 interesting, it says "deploying... today", but I believe you ;-) 17:08:00 I suggest you subscribe to the patch to know when it get's +2 and +A :) 17:08:18 any other questions on this? 17:08:53 #topic Comparison of CI Dashboards: 17:09:26 Last time we met we were looking at comparing difference ci dashboard solutions 17:09:33 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/third-party-ci-dashboard-comp 17:09:46 a few of us got together and populated this etherpad to help ^^ 17:10:16 patrickeast, you around to discuss scoreboard? 17:11:26 ja2, have you used any of these ci dashboards? 17:11:52 asselin, only via these mtgs. 17:11:58 sweston, I see you have one up now: http://dashboard.triniplex.com/#!/ 17:12:04 open discussion might be a better time for this, but I would like to query folks on how they like the way the information is presented in the current solutions, since I am currently writing the first queries for radar 17:12:40 ...still beating mine into working order. comparing multiple is, for my z/vm group, for the moment, a good problem we'd like to mature enough to have 17:12:42 sweston, let's discuss it now as it seems it's just the 3 of us now 17:12:48 yup, right now it's just a list of ci systems, not very exciting, but should soon have some good information 17:13:03 ok 17:13:45 in my opinion, I like the ci-watch infromation 17:14:24 mostly b/c we have a lot of jobs and I care more to see how each one is doing individually than how my ci is doing as a whole 17:15:17 ok, what is the time window most important to you? 17:15:26 24 hours? 7 days 17:15:48 ci-watch has fixed time windows such as 24 hours & 7 days. 17:15:56 scoreboard is more flexible 17:16:32 looking at these for the first time, I do like the quantity of info available in one glance with ci-watch 17:17:01 from operator monitoring, I think 24 hours is a good default. 17:17:44 I was trying to find a query that would catch ci systems reporting failed on a job which Jenkins reports success on, but when I try to combine the queries together I am getting an or result 17:17:44 for 'policing' or trying to find out when something broke 7 days or longer is helpful 17:18:12 ja2, asselin ok, that helps a lot, thanks 17:18:12 asselin's answer might hint at a deeper pattern - the view of interest depends on the role the user is playing, so if you're thinking about adding filtering of some sort maybe role is the basis for that. 17:18:13 sweston, I don't think we need such a query at this time. 17:18:24 ja2 17:18:48 ok, I hear you 17:18:52 ja2, yes, so ci-watch as an option to highlight when jenkins -1 17:19:10 I suggested to skylar last week it's also useful to highlight when jenkins +1 17:19:33 sweston, so I think those overlays are useful 17:19:58 ok 17:21:40 sweston, one thing I see is, for a 3PCI, if I get a failure amongst a sea of successes, no apparent way to see which patch it is... the col headers have long-since scrolled off the top 17:22:49 ...independent of that, if I'm going triage my first 'ask' would be tell me where my CI disagrees with Jenkins 17:23:16 s/going/doing 17:23:48 ja2: I noticed that as well ... I can put floating headers in the UI to account for this 17:23:59 is http://ci-watch.tintri.com/ down for you guys? 17:24:28 asselin: yes, I cannot get to it 17:25:10 ja2: ok, I will keep your second comment in mind as well 17:26:01 asselin, that's what I'm looking at. 17:26:31 ...displayed a few minutes ago, seems to be hung refreshing now that I banged that icon 17:26:46 sweston, when do you think you'll have some queries running? 17:27:43 asselin: working on them now .. am pretty busy these days, but I think I should have something useful by the end of the week 17:28:13 ja2, sweston fyi we were using this room to look at the dashboards offline: #openstack-third-party-ci 17:28:30 we = folks from last meeting 17:28:43 asselin: ok, good to know 17:29:57 asselin, not quite grasping how one looks at them offline but that aside "ok" 17:30:13 ...I did look in that channel, but nothing visible 17:30:24 ok, well I don't think we have enough people today to make a decision today 17:30:36 ja2, offline means not in a recorded meeting 17:30:50 asselin 17:30:57 ... ok got it 17:31:32 #topic Open Discussion 17:31:50 any other topics to bring up or discuss? 17:32:14 asselin: that's all I had 17:32:28 asselin, nothing more from me 17:33:11 ok thanks for attending 17:33:30 #endmeeting