08:01:58 <anteaya> #startmeeting third-party
08:01:59 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jul 14 08:01:58 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is anteaya. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:02:00 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:02:02 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'third_party'
08:02:08 <anteaya> hello
08:02:14 <eantyshev> hello!
08:02:18 <lennyb> Hi, Anteaya
08:02:47 <anteaya> how are you?
08:04:03 <lennyb> anteaya: ok, thanks. how are you feeling today? You felt not that weel last time
08:05:15 <anteaya> thanks feeling better now
08:05:19 <anteaya> thanks for asking
08:05:26 <anteaya> what shall we discuss?
08:05:38 <eantyshev> our CI wasn't receiving some events last Friday, and we had small talk with jeblair: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2015-07-10.log.html#t2015-07-10T18:10:27
08:05:49 <lennyb> I have nothing to discuss
08:07:11 <anteaya> eantyshev: what was the outcome?
08:07:17 <anteaya> lennyb: thanks
08:08:58 <eantyshev> he said that there were 2 connections from Zuul under my CI account, and after some code explorations I think it's normal
08:09:15 <anteaya> it's normal, what is normal?
08:09:44 <eantyshev> that zuul process opens 2 simultaneous tcp connections to review.o.o
08:10:34 <eantyshev> one is for 'gerrit stream-events', and another for 'gerrit query'
08:10:45 <anteaya> oh
08:10:49 <anteaya> I didn't know that
08:11:15 <eantyshev> perhaps, I misunderstood, but I don't think that problem was in that
08:11:15 <anteaya> so gerrit stream events should be getting all the broadcast events
08:11:30 <anteaya> is your system getting all the events again?
08:12:20 <eantyshev> yes, now it receives much more
08:12:38 <eantyshev> can not be sure in 100%
08:13:16 <eantyshev> I mean, no problems nwo
08:13:19 <anteaya> that is true
08:13:19 <eantyshev> now
08:13:26 <anteaya> which repo are you testing?
08:13:53 <eantyshev> I test cinder and os-brick for now
08:14:39 <eantyshev> I also make test changes to ci-sandbox, to illustrate this problem
08:14:50 <anteaya> do you use patrickeast's tool to evaluate your system?
08:15:01 <anteaya> thank you for using ci-sandbox
08:15:01 <eantyshev> so AFAIU it wasn't related to any repo
08:15:12 <anteaya> that is good to know
08:15:21 <eantyshev> what tool?
08:16:37 <lennyb> anteaya: what tool? :)
08:17:25 <anteaya> #link http://ec2-54-67-102-119.us-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com:5000/?project=openstack%2Fcinder&user=&timeframe=24&start=&end=&page_size=
08:17:31 <anteaya> sorry I had to find the link
08:17:34 <anteaya> this tool
08:17:40 <eantyshev> oh, then I do
08:17:45 <anteaya> oh good
08:18:02 <anteaya> it should tell you if you are missing patches
08:18:34 <anteaya> it appears you test about half of them
08:19:28 <anteaya> would that be accurate, or am I reading the output incorrectly?
08:19:59 <eantyshev> we have limited hardware resources, so we trigger on explicit "Virtuozzo Storage CI recheck" and on "Build succeeded" comments by Openstack Jenkins
08:20:40 <anteaya> ah
08:21:21 <anteaya> yes you seem to report on all the jenkins successes
08:22:12 <anteaya> so that is good information to look at
08:22:40 <anteaya> anything else you want to say on this topic?
08:23:34 <eantyshev> no, it works now
08:23:39 <anteaya> okay great
08:23:54 <anteaya> do we have anything else we want to discuss today?
08:24:56 <eantyshev> I also want to remind somehow of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148926/
08:27:05 <anteaya> I asked in -infra for a review
08:27:11 <anteaya> best I can do
08:27:31 <eantyshev> thank you,
08:27:42 <anteaya> thanks for mentioning it
08:27:51 <anteaya> and for creating the patch in the first place
08:28:01 <anteaya> anything else for today?
08:28:02 <eantyshev> And one more question
08:28:07 * anteaya listens
08:28:32 <anteaya> lennyb: thanks for the review :)
08:28:54 <eantyshev> There's ongoing activity on zuulv3: https://review.openstack.org/164371
08:29:31 <anteaya> there is a spec and it is being reviewed/developed, yes
08:29:33 <eantyshev> How soon is it expected to be implemented?
08:29:43 <anteaya> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164371/
08:29:46 <anteaya> no idea
08:30:18 <anteaya> jim is pretty good at writing software but it depends on timing for other things
08:30:30 <anteaya> might be this release might be next release
08:30:50 <anteaya> have you reviewed the spec?
08:30:56 <anteaya> would be good if you do
08:31:40 <eantyshev> I did read it, but afraid it covers too much scope for me
08:32:06 <anteaya> consider offering a comment on the parts you reviewed
08:32:23 <anteaya> in the comment state the sections you reviewed and offer your thoughts
08:33:05 <anteaya> #link http://anteaya.info/blog/2013/03/21/reviewing-an-openstack-patch/
08:33:25 <anteaya> I wrote this blog post some time ago with some suggestions along those lines
08:33:32 <anteaya> if you would like to read it
08:34:16 <eantyshev> I will, thank you
08:34:26 <anteaya> thanks for mentioning it
08:34:41 <anteaya> anything else to discuss today?
08:35:17 <eantyshev> it is fine for now
08:35:32 <anteaya> and nothing else from you, lennyb?
08:35:42 <lennyb> anteaya: yeap
08:35:55 <anteaya> well always nice to talk with you
08:36:07 <anteaya> thanks for your continued attendance and participation
08:36:23 <anteaya> enjoy the rest of the day
08:36:27 <lennyb> all: have a nice day to
08:36:28 <anteaya> and see you next week
08:36:35 <anteaya> lennyb: :)
08:36:40 <anteaya> #endmeeting