08:00:15 <anteaya> #startmeeting third-party
08:00:15 <openstack> Meeting started Tue May 12 08:00:15 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is anteaya. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:00:16 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:00:18 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'third_party'
08:00:39 <anteaya> raise your nand if you are here for the third party meeting
08:00:52 <anteaya> reminder this meeting is cancelled next week due to summit
08:01:10 <anteaya> the next meeting in this time slot is May 26
08:03:35 <kakuma> hi anteaya
08:04:05 <anteaya> kakuma: hello
08:04:07 <anteaya> welcome
08:04:19 <kakuma> Thank you.
08:04:22 <anteaya> I don't know as I have met you before
08:04:27 <anteaya> what system is yours?
08:04:59 <kakuma> No. I am first.
08:05:07 <anteaya> glad you are here
08:05:16 <kakuma> I operate ryu-ci in neutron.
08:05:24 <anteaya> oh yes
08:05:29 <anteaya> I know that system
08:05:37 <kakuma> I have some question to infra-team.
08:05:42 <anteaya> ask away
08:06:31 <kakuma> I have the problem for cross-repo on zuul.
08:06:41 <anteaya> what problem do you have?
08:06:45 <anteaya> have you a stacktrace?
08:06:48 <kakuma> I reported about the problem in StoryBoard(https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2000198).
08:07:18 <kakuma> I hope that it is checked to infra-team.
08:08:05 <kakuma> StoryBoard seems not to be checked.
08:08:42 <anteaya> well the thing is that we would need someone to offer a fix for the problem
08:09:00 <anteaya> and everyone on infra who knows enough about zuul to do so is busy doing other things
08:09:20 <anteaya> for instance we upgraded to gerrit on saturday and then had to downgrade last night
08:09:35 <kakuma> Yes i see.
08:10:14 <anteaya> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-May/063877.html
08:10:29 <anteaya> so it is a matter of someone coming forward and offering a fix
08:11:06 <anteaya> have you time to do so?
08:13:35 <kakuma> Sorry, my pc is sometime freeze.
08:15:37 <anteaya> it happens
08:16:02 <kakuma> currently, I have my many work.
08:16:25 <anteaya> yes
08:16:32 <anteaya> I understand that
08:16:47 <anteaya> but I didn't want you to think we don't appreciate you filing the bug
08:16:49 <anteaya> we do
08:17:16 <anteaya> but the reason you haven't seen it fixed is that so far we haven't had anyone decide they want to fix it
08:24:36 <kakuma> Sorry, ｃould you be a little more easily expressed your sentence.
08:26:29 <anteaya> sure
08:26:35 <anteaya> thank you for filing the bug
08:26:44 <anteaya> we appreciate that you filed the bug
08:26:56 <anteaya> the reason you don't see a fix for the bug you filed
08:27:06 <anteaya> is taht we have noone with time to fix it
08:27:23 <anteaya> is *that we have noone with time to fix it
08:27:57 <kakuma> Thank you.
08:28:02 <anteaya> :)
08:29:55 <kakuma> By the way, do you know latest version of zuul?
08:30:34 <anteaya> it came up in this morning's meeting
08:30:40 <anteaya> I don't know, no
08:30:52 <kakuma> I got the information that there is CI using zuul of 2.0.1.dev374.
08:31:14 <anteaya> but the latest tag it 2.0.0 http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/zuul/refs/
08:31:32 <anteaya> kakuma: do you mind telling me which CI
08:31:41 <anteaya> we havn't released a 2.0.1 of zuul
08:31:53 <kakuma> really.
08:32:06 <anteaya> if we did the tag ref would be listed on that page
08:32:48 <anteaya> also we don't seem to ever have created a x.x.1 version of zuul
08:33:00 <anteaya> looking at the past tags
08:33:20 <anteaya> so someone might be confused
08:33:43 <kakuma> I got it at krtaylor's meeting.
08:33:50 <anteaya> did you
08:33:56 <anteaya> do you recall when?
08:35:07 <kakuma> that is log of http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2015/third_party.2015-05-06-04.00.log.html
08:36:13 <kakuma> It maybe cinder CI.
08:37:04 <anteaya> patrickeast is pretty reliable
08:37:23 <anteaya> but I have no idea where he is getting his zuul version from
08:37:40 <anteaya> since I see no such tag coming from us
08:38:43 <anteaya> and he doesn't seem to say where his version comes from in the log
08:38:58 <kakuma> yes i see. thank you for your chec.
08:39:44 <kakuma> s/chec/check/
08:39:47 <anteaya> sure
08:40:08 <anteaya> I too am interested to find out where patrickeast's version is coming from
08:40:31 <anteaya> thanks for showing me the log so I can see for myself
08:41:23 <kakuma> I have another one question.
08:41:29 <anteaya> please ask
08:42:03 <kakuma> There is our repository on stackforge.
08:42:39 <anteaya> what is the name of the stackforge repository?
08:42:53 <kakuma> it is networking-ofagent.
08:43:33 <kakuma> How can I push stable branch on our repository.
08:44:18 <kakuma> Is there some documents for that?
08:44:31 <yamamoto> kakuma: my understanding is that we can create a branch after https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182144/ is merged
08:44:36 <anteaya> this file controls the permissions you have on your repository: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/project-config/tree/gerrit/acls/stackforge/networking-ofagent.config
08:45:26 <anteaya> yamamoto: you are correct
08:45:41 <anteaya> why do you have permissions for third party ci to vote on your repo?
08:45:46 <anteaya> is that your ci system?
08:46:22 <yamamoto> networking-ofagent-ci is our ci.  it covers ryu and ofagent.
08:47:00 <anteaya> yes
08:47:26 <anteaya> but why have you given verification permissions on your stackforge repo to ofagent-ci?
08:47:32 <kakuma> Thank you yamamoto.
08:48:07 <anteaya> is ryu ci voting on your networking-ofagent repo?
08:48:17 <yamamoto> anteaya: yes
08:48:22 <anteaya> okay
08:48:54 <anteaya> thanks for letting me know
08:50:11 <yamamoto> is branch creation procedure documented somewhere?  i only found a procedure for release tags.
08:51:46 <anteaya> this section is probably the best section: http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html#release-management
08:51:57 <anteaya> but I think it needs to be re-written
08:52:02 <anteaya> ttx ^
08:52:19 <yamamoto> thank you.  i'll take a look.
08:52:25 <anteaya> as we have gone to a workflow of moving straight to stable branches
08:52:36 <anteaya> and not using proposed branches at all anymore
08:53:07 <anteaya> there is another section in that manual on feature branches, but it isn't exactly what you need
08:53:30 <anteaya> as feature branches are for development and suggest you add pushing merge commit permissions to your repo
08:53:51 <anteaya> which you don't need if you are working with a branch for release purposes model
08:53:55 <yamamoto> then, after getting permission, just creating stable/foo in web ui is ok?
08:53:58 <ttx> anteaya: noted
08:54:07 <anteaya> thanks
08:54:41 <anteaya> yamamoto: yes after the patch that adds the create rule merges then just create the stable/foo branch
08:55:08 <yamamoto> anteaya: ok i'll try after the patch merged.  thank you!
08:55:09 <anteaya> are you creating a branch for release purposes?
08:55:23 <anteaya> thank you for pointing out the patch
08:56:10 <yamamoto> anteaya: yes.  we are considering to align our repo with neutron for easier releases
08:56:17 <anteaya> wonderful
08:56:30 <anteaya> then that patch that adds the create rule should be all you need
08:56:38 <yamamoto> as neutron plugin api is still a moving target...
08:56:43 <anteaya> yes
08:58:12 <anteaya> anything else we can discuss today?
08:58:19 <anteaya> 2 minutes left in this meeting
08:58:27 <yamamoto> nothing from me
08:58:31 <anteaya> yamamoto: thanks
08:58:42 <anteaya> kakuma: anything else from you today?
08:59:07 <kakuma> nothing from me too
08:59:20 <anteaya> it has been a pleasure to talk to you both today
08:59:31 <anteaya> next week's meeting in this time slot is cancelled
08:59:54 <anteaya> the next meeting in this time slot will be May 26th
09:00:01 <anteaya> thanks so much for your participation
09:00:06 <anteaya> see you in 2 weeks
09:00:10 <anteaya> #endmeeting