04:00:28 #startmeeting third-party 04:00:29 Meeting started Wed May 6 04:00:28 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is krtaylor. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 04:00:30 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 04:00:32 The meeting name has been set to 'third_party' 04:00:52 anyone here for the third party CI working group meeting? 04:01:00 o/ 04:01:11 hey patrickeast 04:01:51 hi 04:02:09 hi kakuma 04:02:31 hi krtaylor 04:02:46 kakuma, I don't recall you joining us before, is this your first working group meeting? 04:03:06 yes 04:03:32 kakuma, welcome, the 400UTC meetings are usually much less formal 04:03:58 it may have something to do with me being so tired :) 04:04:35 yes, now it is 13:00 here. 04:05:34 here is the agenda for today, although I don't think we will have a quorum to go through it 04:05:38 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty#4.2F22.2F15_0400_UTC 04:06:24 there is a gerrit upgrade Saturday 04:06:52 shouldn’t be any impact for 3rd party ci’s though, right? 04:07:05 patrickeast, shouldn't be much 04:07:15 just a brief outage 04:07:42 i suppose worst case have to update zuul if it does break something 04:07:42 kakuma, do you operate a CI system? 04:08:01 I work in ryu team. 04:08:25 patrickeast, I wouldnt think so, but yeah 04:08:47 kakuma, ryu team? 04:09:01 neutron, right? 04:09:08 Yes, I operate ryu-ci. 04:10:43 kakuma, are you going to Vancouver? 04:11:18 No, but Yamamot will go to Vancouver. 04:11:35 oh, ok 04:12:12 well, it doesn't look like the third party CI working group will get it's design session that we proposed 04:12:43 bummer 04:12:47 there is a BoF session instead, and the infra discussions 04:13:16 yeah, needless to say I was rather disappointed, it was such a huge success in Paris 04:13:49 but, the BoF was already scheduled, so I think it was deemed sufficient 04:14:27 I put a link in the agenda 04:14:49 Stefano Stabellini is running it, but we may just take it over :) 04:14:57 haha 04:15:50 its good to see all the attention on CI across openstack 04:16:01 even if I am not running a session 04:16:50 yea i’m glad at least one of the CI ones made it in, i saw a few when voting 04:17:40 patrickeast, yours? 04:17:49 and asselin, right? 04:17:58 that one didn’t make it : ( 04:18:02 NO 04:18:04 i think this BoF one is the only one 04:18:08 dang 04:18:28 there were a couple more from other various vendors too 04:18:45 i think most fell short by targeting a specific project 04:18:54 this ones more broad, applies to everyone 04:19:04 agreed 04:19:31 the overview reads like our mission statement, so I'm looking forward to it :) 04:19:59 kakuma, so you may have heard that we have our own repo now 04:20:19 #link https://github.com/stackforge/third-party-ci-tools 04:21:02 feel free to contribute any helpful scripts or tools you have written, that may help other teams 04:21:25 Yes, I have heard it. 04:21:59 oo that reminds me, i was going to put some nagios checks i cobbled together in there 04:22:02 I was going to update the readme to describe an initial directory structure for contributions 04:22:12 patrickeast, please 04:22:16 currently I have not some tools comitted. 04:22:56 patrickeast, all the cool monitoring tools you have, what about the dashboard? 04:23:16 i could put that in there if there is interest 04:23:28 patrickeast, we are using it, not sure what mods we made, but it works great for us 04:23:48 mmedvede got it working for us 04:23:56 yea i set it up as a wall display thing (we’ve got some tv’s up around the office) 04:24:04 works pretty well for that 04:24:05 nice 04:24:17 so yea i can move it in there 04:24:36 i’ll put up some reviews tomorrow morining to dump some things in 04:24:45 morning* 04:25:00 patrickeast, thanks! 04:25:17 kakuma, let me know if you have any questions about any of this 04:25:28 kakuma, I'll be happy to help 04:25:58 Thanks. I have asking about zuul. 04:26:17 Can I ask about zuul here? 04:26:29 yea definitely 04:26:34 sure 04:26:45 what's your question? 04:27:02 Thamks. I'm trying to process a gerrit trigger of cross-repo. 04:27:20 but zuul on our CI fails when process that. I reported on the StoryBoard about the problem(https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2000198). 04:27:45 * krtaylor looks 04:28:11 On the other hand, can I see examples of configuration or some docs about cross-repo somewhere? 04:29:21 it kind of looks like a bug 04:29:32 kakuma, thats not something we have seen 04:29:39 yes it does look like a bug 04:30:29 kakuma, can I ask why you need cross project dependencies ? maybe there is another way to accomplish what you want? 04:32:01 Some gerrit trigger have cross-repo depends. 04:32:39 When our CI get it, our ci fails. 04:33:05 i think zuul is supposed to handle it correctly, i don’t remember hearing about anything special that needs to be done to configure it 04:34:32 Do your ci correctly process cross-repo? 04:35:17 dunno, i haven’t seen any errors from it, but i’m not sure if there have actually been any in cinder that it has attempted yet 04:36:04 we have not seen failures like this, and we test nova, keystone and a few other projects 04:36:37 but that may be a newer version 04:36:58 I'm tyrying it in neutron. 04:37:17 I was looking to see if creating a launchpad bug was the right thing, but it is tracked in storyboard, so, it is in the right place 04:37:48 What version of zuul do you use. 04:37:55 kakuma, that would be a good question to raise in the infra channel, it sounds like a bug 04:38:07 kakuma, let me check 04:38:38 krtaylor, thanks you. 04:39:16 Yes I will ask that infra channel. 04:39:41 i’ve got Zuul version: 2.0.1.dev374 04:40:56 Thanks patrickeast. I will try that version. 04:41:38 Thank you for your advice. 04:42:02 yes, the bug shows 2.0.0.post356? 04:43:24 patrickeast, did you have anything on your mind you wanted to bring up? 04:43:41 Yes, I tried 2.0.0.post356. and it did not work. 04:44:20 krtaylor: nothin much from me this week 04:44:52 starting to set up system for fibre channel testing, but so far its smooth sailing 04:45:28 excellent 04:48:44 ok, well, if there is nothing else 04:48:57 I guess we can wrap it up a bit early 04:49:06 are cross-repo and cross-project same function? 04:49:31 kakuma, oh, no, I miss-typed 04:50:07 krtaylor, OK. I see. 04:55:35 thanks everyone, next week will be our last before summit, and the meeting the week of summit will be canceled 04:55:39 due to summit 04:55:49 so we'll resume after 04:56:05 thanks again, see you next week! 04:56:06 sounds good 04:56:08 cya 04:56:22 #endmeeting