04:00:16 #startmeeting third-party 04:00:17 Meeting started Wed Jan 14 04:00:16 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is krtaylor. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 04:00:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 04:00:21 The meeting name has been set to 'third_party' 04:00:39 anyone here for third-party ci working group? 04:00:52 hey 04:01:08 finally remembered to update my calander reminders for the new meeting times :D 04:01:13 hi patrickeast 04:02:00 I see asselin_ and mmedvede joined the channel earlier, maybe they are lurking 04:02:02 hi 04:02:09 hi asselin_ 04:02:28 looks like sweston is in channel also 04:03:33 well, not a huge agenda today, so that will give us time to discuss 04:03:43 #topic Active work 04:04:26 so, first up is third-party documentation refresh 04:04:59 there is now 2 patches 04:05:21 I will update my query to include the new topic 04:05:22 I pushed a Overview section refresh 04:05:34 here is the etherpad 04:05:37 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/third-party-ci-documentation 04:05:57 yes asselin_ that would be great 04:06:04 I added that to the etherpad today 04:06:20 I figured that would be a good thing to have the topics set 04:06:59 yes, much easier to find and review as a group ++ 04:07:26 I am still not sure what the best way to handle that is, we may need to queue up a few patches and then get on infra agenda 04:07:59 or maybe schedule a mini-sprint, but I hate to wait until Feb to land some of the changes 04:08:27 but we would need infra at the sprint 04:08:31 I think a mini-sprint is a good idea 04:08:44 infra had good results in their doc sprint 04:09:00 doc --> infra manual 04:09:03 and it sounded like everybody was busy until Feb, we barely got the split one scheduled 04:09:11 yes, that was a huge success 04:10:00 I think it would be good to start scheduling the next one, especially if it's a few weeks out. 04:10:43 yeah, I guess it would have to be the first week of Feb, 3 weeks out 04:10:44 But maybe we can do it sooner. We just need to get 2 cores to support approvals 04:11:10 I'm out the 1st week of Feb :/ 04:11:18 ouch 04:11:28 ok, well we need to do it sooner then 04:11:53 I'll send email to discuss and see if we can get infra core interest 04:13:12 last week of Jan is the cinder midcycle meetup 04:13:17 #action krtaylor to rally infra core and third-party with via email around third-party documentation mini-sprint 04:13:26 yeah, that was the problem 04:13:32 We should try to do something this week or next. 04:14:04 next Wed is our early meeting, we could start a sprint then 04:14:40 I have one section fairly done, and requirements well underway 04:14:52 but there is a lot of detail in the later sections 04:15:08 we need to decide what to document and then do it 04:16:15 that's what's nice about the sprint...forces your to allocate some time. 04:16:39 next wed & thursday are good 04:16:49 yes, thanks for signing up to help, I bet I can get mmedvede to help too 04:16:53 we can do 48 hour sprint 04:17:12 yes, I think we'll need more time than 24 hrs 04:17:31 infra doc manual was 48 04:18:01 patrickeast, you still there? 04:18:06 yep 04:18:18 we'll need just as much time I am afraid, fewer helpers 04:18:23 I hope I am wrong 04:18:58 what do you think about sprint next wed & thurs? 04:19:48 i should be available, although i'm not sure how much help i 04:19:53 'll be* 04:20:22 i find myself asking you guys how things work most of the time, so not sure if i can run off and write up docs easily 04:20:36 little tasks maybe, if there are some 04:20:43 I'll propose the idea tomorrow morning via email 04:20:43 well, you can write the Q part of the FAQ :) 04:20:52 haha yea, can do 04:20:57 yes, actually there is a lot of cut and paste 04:21:20 we have tons of meeting logs, good sources for q/a 04:21:28 krtaylor, ++ 04:21:51 we can prob get Omri and Andreas involved too 04:22:02 oh and sweston 04:22:20 yup ;-) 04:22:26 hey sweston 04:22:29 hi sweston 04:22:41 krtaylor, asselin_ hello 04:22:44 just in time :) 04:23:24 I have been slammed with handling design/implementation issues for my software defined hardware switch. unfortunately, I have had no time for the dashboard, or (anything else not directly related to my company) since we last met. 04:23:41 so if there is not anything else on docs, next topic is monitoring dashboard 04:23:51 beat me to it 04:24:10 so we can probably skip the next topic :-) 04:24:37 sweston, understood, I think all of us have a "day job", let us know when you are ready to jump back in 04:25:04 krtaylor: sure thing. thanks for understanding 04:25:05 sweston, is there anything we can do in the mean time? 04:25:48 krtaylor: sure, everyone is welcome to start looking over the new code in the radar repository 04:26:07 there is lots there 04:26:20 I know jhesketh has commented, but the spec is prob low on your priorities currently 04:26:50 yes, I did see that you were using that repo, thats good 04:27:12 yup 04:27:52 I was wondering if we could patch together the old radar as a quick fix while we were rolling out the new monitoring service 04:28:31 the old radar code is in the scripts directory 04:28:39 I have not had time to figure out what broke though, I suspect CI member lists? 04:29:06 you are welcome to look over it, but there is not much there 04:29:27 I was always a fan of the gauges, but I am easily amused 04:29:49 i've already completed most of the effort for this in creating the rest api and web client 04:30:00 I may, but I can't commit to it 04:30:11 sweston, yes, and that is where we should invest review time 04:30:37 the easy part is next, which will be implementing some of the data gathering methods 04:31:06 good to know, that will help 04:31:30 do you have a rough idea for when you will be able to return to it? 04:31:51 next week, most likely 04:32:48 that should work since my extra hours will be on documentation through the mini-sprint, if we are going to pull that off 04:33:10 ok, that sounds good 04:33:18 anything else for monitoring dashboard? 04:33:31 not from me, no 04:33:53 next is puppet module split out 04:34:12 mini sprint is Jan 28th 04:34:31 15:00 UTC 04:34:34 asselin_, I did see that you added to the etherpad, with examples 04:34:41 that will really help 04:34:54 yes, they were there before but got lost somehow 04:35:34 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-module-split-sprint 04:36:09 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#Schedule_of_Upcoming_OpenStack_Virtual_Sprints 04:36:16 official sprint page ^^ 04:36:49 are you thinking that the patch sets will be mostly done before then and that mini-sprint will be discussions and approvals? 04:37:06 krtaylor, not necessarily 04:38:02 in theory, we shouldn't have to do the patches beforehand, but we can 04:38:14 ok, so any advance work is proof of concept 04:38:43 yes, anything done beforehand will help iron out issues 04:38:53 sweston, is your script still running in cron? 04:39:06 sweston, will you be available for the sprint? 04:39:08 I'll see if I can get my patches revised beforehand 04:39:40 asselin_: yes, I will be there. I stopped the script last week when I created the last patchset 04:40:09 that will be a fun one, to crank all that out in a day or so and get it done 04:40:47 sweston, ok, I'm hoping we can use those repos. 04:41:00 krtaylor, ++ 04:41:18 asselin_: yup, I'll start the script back up again tonight 04:41:35 and the question I had in the meeting agenda is answered in the etherpad 04:41:40 about the storyboard 04:41:43 sweston, ok. if you have ideas for the script, and just lack time, let me know and I can try to help out. 04:41:56 asselin_: sure 04:42:06 mmedvede and I can too 04:42:21 yes, I think storyboard would be a good idea. It coordinates and you get recognition there too. 04:42:23 krtaylor: excellent 04:42:52 #action asselin_ to make sure storyboard is up-to-date 04:43:04 ah, yes, good point 04:43:51 patrickeast, if you want to help, these are pretty simple tasks 04:44:22 unless you're at the cinder mid-cycle meetup 04:44:32 yea i'll be at the meetup 04:45:19 ok, anyone have anything else on puppet module split out? 04:46:00 and finally, in-tree 3rd party ci, also yours asselin_ 04:46:18 that would be good to have infra feedback on 04:46:28 yes, not much update. just lots of thoughts 04:46:39 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:thirdpartyci,n,z 04:46:47 seems that will accelerate after the puppet module splits are done 04:47:04 like, how to centralize configuration? 04:47:23 for both upstream and third-party 04:47:30 no, I wasn't thinking of that 04:47:53 really, what's the best approach to refactor and where to put the new pieces 04:48:52 My latest thinking is to start an etherpad and go through the different pieces. 04:49:12 I hope to get some time later this week and do that 04:49:17 well, we can come up with a suggestion, but I feel like the solution will be whatever has the least impact on infra 04:49:32 that would be a great start 04:49:59 yes, that's why it's tricky and needs input from them. 04:50:05 agreed 04:50:40 refactoring puppet is not that easy. unless there are some tools I don't know about. 04:51:26 I am still learning the subtleties of puppet 04:52:14 so that's it unless anyone has questions or ideas 04:53:03 great, thanks for all the effort in everything 04:53:14 #topic Open Discussion 04:53:26 anyone have anything not on the agenda? 04:53:39 anyone else still awake? :) 04:55:05 well I'll end the meeting then 04:55:10 thanks everyone! 04:55:11 thanks krtaylor 04:55:30 thanks krtaylor 04:55:31 #endmeeting