18:00:35 #startmeeting third-party 18:00:36 Meeting started Mon Jul 7 18:00:35 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is krtaylor. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:37 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:00:39 The meeting name has been set to 'third_party' 18:00:54 Hi everyone 18:01:00 Who is here for third-party meeting? 18:01:09 I am :) 18:01:23 Svedrin, thanks, I saw the agenda item 18:01:24 I ... 18:01:35 Me 18:01:38 I 18:01:48 cool! 18:01:54 so let's get started then 18:02:00 here is the agenda: 18:02:16 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty#Agenda_for_next_meeting 18:02:31 #topic Welcome & Reminder of OpenStack Mission 18:02:57 a reminder for the mission 18:02:59 #info The OpenStack Open Source Cloud Mission: to produce the ubiquitous Open Source Cloud Computing platform that will meet the needs of public and private clouds regardless of size, by being simple to implement and massively scalable. 18:03:15 hello all! 18:03:18 #topic Review of previous week's open action items 18:03:23 hello 18:03:50 we had 3 actions from last week 18:04:25 one was mine for a patch for suggestions for how to meet requirements 18:04:41 I did not get that done, due to the holiday in the US 18:05:15 the other was kevinbenton starting the thread for time to complete testing 18:05:37 that is done and getting good discussion in ml 18:06:16 a reminder to everyone, please tag discussions [third-party] when posting to openstack-dev ml 18:06:24 krtaylor: is there a patch already created in Gerrit for the documentation? 18:06:55 sweston, there are the two patches anteaya has, but I have not created one yet for my action 18:07:06 there was another action, though 18:07:19 krtaylor: ok, just checking to make sure I have the right search parameters :-) 18:07:22 oh, communicate cinder and neutron timelines 18:07:53 sweston, #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack-infra/config+branch:master+topic:third-party,n,z 18:08:01 hm 18:08:02 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack-infra/config+branch:master+topic:third-party,n,z 18:08:22 all, please review these patches 18:08:57 the time line communication action was not assigned, did that come up in cinder and neutron weekly meetings? 18:09:15 do we have cinder and neutron represented? 18:09:24 sweston, you are neutron right? 18:10:19 well, I'll take an action to make sure that happens this week 18:10:36 krtaylor: I started a discussion with anteaya 18:10:59 krtaylor: I need to speak with her to follow up on the next steps 18:11:02 #action krtaylor to verify communication of cinder and neutron time lines 18:11:10 krtaylor: so I can take that one 18:11:14 sweston, yes, please do 18:11:38 I think that covers previous week's items 18:12:00 #topic Announcements 18:12:11 does anyone have any announcements? 18:12:17 krtaylor: awesome, can you post a new action 18:12:32 krtaylor: so it is reflected in the minutes? 18:13:02 sweston, yes, and I assigned it so I'll make sure it gets done to both projects 18:13:15 krtaylor: ok, great. thanks. 18:13:16 sweston, oh, for you 18:13:17 yes 18:13:24 krtaylor: yes 18:13:41 #action sweston to communicate timelines 18:13:51 ok, lets move on 18:14:08 #topic OpenStack Program Items 18:14:22 any OpenStack program items? 18:14:29 news from projects? 18:14:51 well, I posted this earlier 18:14:53 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack-infra/config+branch:master+topic:third-party,n,z 18:15:31 please review these patches, let get them done, I'll ping anteaya when she is back to get them closed out 18:15:52 ok 18:15:55 any discussion now on these? 18:16:22 krtaylor: maybe I can move mine into your requirements/recommendations 18:16:43 krtaylor: not ar this time, but I may have some additions later on how to do third party ci with puppet 18:16:51 luqas, yes, I did see that in the email thread 18:16:57 :%s/ar/at/g 18:17:04 sweston, please patch, that's well needed 18:17:36 krtaylor: ok, I can create a topic branch for it 18:17:45 krtaylor: ok, so we'll see where it fits better 18:17:50 luqas, if you want, I'll roll that up in my patch 18:18:05 krtaylor: that would be nice too 18:18:14 luqas, or you can patch and I'll wait for the merge, whatever you prefer 18:18:45 were do you think it reads better? 18:19:16 luqas, I am less worried about it being perfect right now, we can always refactor 18:19:34 there is so much to document here 18:19:52 krtaylor: ok, will patch it then we'll see 18:19:54 krtaylor: correction, I guess that would be same topic, new subject 18:20:24 the challange is going to be to get it recorded, then we can worry about how consumable it is 18:20:36 sweston, I don't follow 18:20:57 krtaylor: never mind, just thinking out loud. 18:21:00 sweston, oh, for the patch, yes 18:21:11 krtaylor: yup 18:21:17 ok, ever onward 18:21:19 #topic Deadlines & Deprecations 18:21:32 anything to communicate here? 18:21:41 new deadlines? 18:21:57 other than the cinder/neutron? 18:22:13 I guess we will see in the next cycle for other projects 18:22:56 next item then 18:23:01 #topic Highlighting a Program or Gerrit Account 18:23:42 s0nea, Svedrin - you are up to discuss openATTIC 18:24:17 ok, yes... hi all. we a trying to set up a ci testing system for our openattic project 18:24:25 and i think we need a little help 18:24:38 anteaya, told me that here is the right place to ask for 18:25:13 s0nea, can you give us a very short overview of openattic? 18:25:35 we already received a service account and followed up the guide http://www.joinfu.com/2014/02/setting-up-an-openstack-external-testing-system-part-2/ up to section Test the dsvm-tempest-full Jenkins job 18:26:04 s0nea: can you please share what are you targeting that you need help with. If I can, I will. 18:26:47 s0nea, I think there are several of us here that have background here, as well as the gurus from my team :) 18:27:20 s0nea: I have a little experience to setup CI, I can help you. I also writing some posts about how to setup a 3rd Party CI like o-infra at http://blog.arxcruz.net/ 18:27:20 ok fine, krtaylor :) 18:27:32 what is the goal? what are you stuck on? 18:27:43 ok, the first point is, that after clicking in jenkins on the play button, it only ran about 300 tests... ist that normal? 18:28:16 is there an option we need to enable to run more tests? 18:28:17 ArxCruz, yeah a "little" experience :) 18:28:43 :) 18:28:47 s0nea, we'd need more info 18:29:28 s0nea, did you get passed/failed/skipped? are you skipping by passing regex? 18:29:47 krtaylor, no, i think all works fine 18:30:08 it said success at the end of the test 18:30:17 s0nea, what project/component? 18:30:19 but it reported a few errors in logs 18:31:15 i'm talking about the dsvm-tempest-full job 18:31:51 s0nea, ok, a google search shows that it is software defined storage, that is some of the background needed 18:32:01 ah yes... ok 18:32:09 we wrote cinder driver 18:32:14 ah, ok, that helps 18:32:53 for using our storage tool as blockstorage 18:33:36 s0nea, this may be something better suited for an -infra discussion, we may need to see logs (pastebin) 18:34:18 find us there, ArxCruz and I can help for sure, looks like fawadkhaliq volunteered also 18:34:20 ok... you want see the log of the dsvm-tempest-full job? 18:34:43 s0nea, it would help, tail and post to pastebin 18:34:55 post link and we'll discuss 18:35:00 ok... no problem 18:36:38 ok, is ther any questions for s0nea 18:36:41 there 18:37:05 s0nea, it would be nice to learn more about your environment too 18:37:06 no, I agree, we need more info to help. 18:37:34 s0nea, maybe when you get it working you can come back and discuss how you got everything to work? 18:37:46 if the logs are not available now for paste, then s0nea might like to know where we can look for the link 18:38:11 krtaylor, yes, sure 18:38:47 #link http://paste.openstack.org/ 18:38:47 here is the paste: http://paste.openstack.org/show/85606/ 18:39:01 ok, cool! 18:39:23 so lets move that discussion to -infra and move along 18:39:40 #topic Open Discussion 18:39:51 so I'll open the floor 18:40:08 last week we discussed terminology at length 18:40:35 I suggested that writing these terms down would be good, it started a nice ML discussion 18:41:26 I am hoping to see some agreement on things like success, failure, passed, etc 18:42:05 so that's what I had, needed to be a formal topic for this week's meeting, but ran out of time at the end of last week 18:42:05 awesome. what do you think the next step is? 18:42:19 ah, ok 18:42:32 sweston, I think a proposal for the terms, on the ML, then a patch 18:42:41 maybe to a terms section of the doc 18:42:51 krtaylor: cool. would you like to team up on that? 18:42:52 but I am flexible on it 18:42:58 sweston, +1 18:43:24 sweston, do you want to post a proposal? 18:43:37 krtaylor, +1. Yes. 18:43:44 krtaylor: to the ML? 18:43:49 excellent 18:43:52 yes, please 18:44:11 krtaylor: I can do that. 18:44:36 krtaylor: I might have some questions for you after I google around a bit 18:44:47 #action sweston to propose terminology for test completion criteria, success, fail, pass, etc 18:44:49 s0nea: need to check your localrc, I'm pretty sure it's running only 300 tests because you're disabling something in your localrc 18:44:54 sweston, absolutely 18:45:01 krtaylor: kk 18:45:17 ArxCruz, thx for the quick look! 18:45:37 s0nea: also you're running smoke tests, not the full tempest 18:45:38 oh that was fast, thank you ArxCruz :) 18:46:56 is there any other topics for discussion? 18:47:14 I do not have any 18:47:39 I think in general we need to get some of these outstanding doc patches finished up and start looking at requirements 18:47:57 but that will wait until anteaya is back 18:48:23 ok, well I guess we can finish early then, anyone? 18:48:59 well, we'll finish early for once! 18:49:01 krtaylor, can we just ping one of you guys when we have questions? 18:49:25 Svedrin, sure, find one of us in #openstack-infra 18:49:31 ok will do, thanks :) 18:49:52 last call 18:50:03 thanks everyone! 18:50:17 yes, thank you all for your support :) 18:50:21 #endmeeting