14:03:54 <sgordon> #startmeeting telcowg
14:03:55 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Mar  9 14:03:54 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sgordon. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:03:56 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:03:59 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'telcowg'
14:04:02 <sgordon> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nfv-meeting-agenda
14:04:07 <sgordon> #topic roll call o/
14:04:13 <cloudon> hi
14:04:24 <alraddarla> hello
14:04:36 <adrian-hoban> Hello
14:04:46 <srwilkers> hello
14:05:21 <sgordon> #topic action item review
14:05:28 <sgordon> we had a few action items from last week...
14:05:45 <sgordon> #info sgordon was to email product work group to confirm process for updating existing    proposals with mid-cycle changes (sgordon,    14:13:13)
14:06:06 <sgordon> this did not actually happened, but based on the following AIs it seems we worked it out... ;)
14:06:28 <sgordon> #info sgordon followed this process to move complex instance placement submission
14:06:33 <sgordon> #link https://review.openstack.org/290459
14:06:58 <sgordon> #info cloudon followed this process to move vIMS submission
14:07:05 <sgordon> #link https://review.openstack.org/290347
14:07:18 <sgordon> #info sgordon followed this process to move security segregation submission
14:07:26 <sgordon> #link https://review.openstack.org/290462
14:08:25 <cloudon> I also did the vSBC one
14:08:29 <cloudon> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290060/
14:08:37 <sgordon> ah nice one
14:08:40 <sgordon> #chair cloudon
14:08:40 <openstack> Current chairs: cloudon sgordon
14:08:54 <sgordon> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290060/
14:09:13 <cloudon> from what I could see the main differences in the template (Aside from re-odering) was the removal of the gaps section?
14:09:15 <sgordon> #info vSBC also submitted ^
14:09:24 <sgordon> cloudon, yes it does appear that way
14:10:25 <sgordon> the process diagram has also been updated
14:10:27 <sgordon> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ProductTeam/User_Stories
14:10:40 <sgordon> i believe what they have done is move gap analysis to the cross project team...
14:10:52 <sgordon> i still think it would be nice to have somewhere to record already identified gaps
14:11:29 <cloudon> Agreed - seems a shame to lose that
14:12:08 <cloudon> Am I right that the "cross project spec" and "user story tracker" both start out as "none" then get asigned some way into the process?
14:12:53 <sgordon> cloudon, yes
14:13:12 <sgordon> cloudon, the tracker i think is still wip
14:14:46 <sgordon> ok
14:15:06 <sgordon> so we will wait and see what the review feedback says but it looked to me like we had done what was expected
14:15:21 <sgordon> #topic OPNFV and OpenStack Collaboration BoF
14:15:28 <sgordon> #link https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/7510
14:15:29 <cloudon> All feedback/discussion is via gerrit review?
14:15:35 <sgordon> yes that is the intent
14:17:46 <sgordon> ok
14:17:59 <sgordon> i wanted to highlight the above linked event from the openstack summit austin schedule
14:18:02 <sgordon> just for visibility
14:18:04 <cloudon> Is that summit link correct? Can't get to it
14:18:16 <sgordon> seems to work here
14:18:19 <sgordon> O.o
14:18:54 <cloudon> Ah - works in IE, not Chrome - some security violation
14:19:24 <sgordon> weird
14:19:52 <sgordon> anyway, it's a thing :)
14:20:13 <sgordon> i did not request a wg specific space for this summit instead figuring it would make sense to collaborate with the opnfv folks
14:20:16 <cloudon> Yup, looks useful
14:20:44 <cloudon> will the PWG be doing anything related to submitted stories?
14:21:23 <sgordon> i believe they were aiming for a working session on the friday
14:21:49 <sgordon> let me check i am not sure if that would end up on this schedule or the design summit one
14:21:59 <sgordon> not listed yet
14:22:04 <sgordon> that was certainly the ask though
14:22:08 <cloudon> ok, ta
14:23:12 <sgordon> #topic next week
14:23:20 <sgordon> im going to be MIA during next week's meeting time
14:23:34 <sgordon> not sure if folks want to try keep the slot or skip
14:23:50 <sgordon> i will also be away earlier in the week and miss the product wg meeting unfortunately
14:24:02 <cloudon> I'm happy to skip but will try to make the PWG this time
14:24:39 <sgordon> excellent, thanks for that
14:25:16 <sgordon> ideally now that our submissions are up to date i think it makes sense to move more of the convo to the product wg
14:25:22 <sgordon> i think we now have them all in their repo?
14:25:30 <sgordon> (or submitted against it at least)
14:25:36 <cloudon> yes, think so
14:26:44 <sgordon> #topic open discussion
14:26:54 <sgordon> anything else folks want to raise
14:27:18 <sgordon> cloudon, adrian-hoban, alraddarla srwilkers ^
14:27:20 <sgordon> ?
14:27:29 <cloudon> nope, I'm done
14:27:34 <alraddarla> Nope, I'm good. Thanks!
14:27:35 <srwilkers> nope :)
14:28:53 <adrian-hoban> I haven't been able to attend for a while. Great to see the progress getting into the product-wg
14:29:43 <sgordon> getting there :)
14:30:01 <sgordon> ok
14:30:08 <sgordon> i will send an email about cancelling next week
14:30:12 <sgordon> thanks all for your time
14:30:16 <cloudon> thanks
14:30:16 <sgordon> !
14:30:20 <sgordon> #endmeeting