14:01:10 #startmeeting telcowg 14:01:11 Meeting started Wed Sep 9 14:01:10 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sgordon. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:12 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TelcoWorkingGroup 14:01:12 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:15 #topic roll call 14:01:15 The meeting name has been set to 'telcowg' 14:01:16 * sgordon here 14:01:22 hello 14:01:53 hi 14:02:03 hello 14:02:40 #topic OpenStack Summit Tokyo 14:02:43 just an FYI here 14:02:48 #info Working session confirmed Tuesday 2:00 - 2:40 14:02:52 #link http://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/event/b060647ccd40868b30ef2ab5cab76fda#.VfAyOLOf5ak 14:03:13 i have a confirmed 40 minute slot with a ~30 person room and it is listed on the schedule as of yesterday 14:03:33 so for those of you keenly putting your schedules together for the event it is there ;) 14:04:02 #topic Volunteers for turning use cases into RFEs / backlog specs (Neutron / Nova) respectively 14:04:16 this is picking up something we discussed in an earlier meeting but i dont believe we got owners for 14:04:22 #info Taking BGP use case as a "guinea pig" to turn into RFEs/backlog 14:04:26 #info Taking Affinity gap from the IMS use case and doing same 14:04:39 i can probably take the latter 14:05:00 was going to suggest I could take it as it's mine, but you'll have better visibility into th eprocess 14:05:09 there is actually already a spec proposing soft affinity, and a broader spec proposal from jay about reworking server groups entirely 14:05:29 i think defining a more use case focused backlog spec might actually help them drive an implementation that meets the real need best 14:05:56 #action sgordon to write backlog spec for affinity gap from the IMS use case, bounce off cloudon for review/clarity :) 14:06:12 cool - happy to help in whatever way I can 14:06:19 cloudon, np i will reach out if/when i need to confirm some details and provide a link to the submission as well 14:06:29 so that leaves us with the BGP one 14:06:55 i should add that we probably also might want to merge the use cases to kick this off... 14:07:02 #link https://review.openstack.org/179142 14:07:07 #link https://review.openstack.org/171680 14:07:35 aveiga, any chance you could take a look at either of those? 14:07:42 (just from a review perspective) 14:07:56 sgordon: will do 14:08:09 ta 14:08:43 if there is no lucky volunteer w.r.t. BGP use case i will reach out to mathieu and see if he is willing/able to own the next step 14:09:11 #action sgordon to reach out to Mathieu (owner of BGP submission) about next steps. 14:09:23 #topic Reviews 14:09:25 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/telcowg-usecases,n,z 14:09:36 that discussion bleeds into the normal review discussion 14:09:46 thanks for sorting out the SBC/IMS git gotchas 14:09:55 but basically i want to get a few more of these merged so that we can see how they feed into product wg/rfes/backlogs 14:10:03 cloudon, np :) 14:10:10 now just need some magic +2s... 14:10:48 as cloudon notes there were some issues with the vIMS/SBC use case submissions that needed some git magic (incorrect dependency and a file accidentally included in the wrong one) but they should be resolved now 14:12:40 im guessing we dont have ralf/mathieu/dan to discuss the ones that need some iteration 14:14:54 ok 14:14:58 let's call it for now 14:15:23 i will attempt to handle the vIMS gap and hopefully we can use that to guide others on how to pitch in with those next steps 14:15:43 ok, thanks 14:16:14 once we have sounded that out we can also possibly look at how we help e.g. OPNFV use cases make their way in through a similar pipeline 14:16:15 thanks, sgordon 14:16:33 np 14:16:38 thanks all for your time 14:16:40 #endmeeting