18:03:15 <knikolla> #startmeeting tc
18:03:15 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Jul 11 18:03:15 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is knikolla. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:03:15 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
18:03:15 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'tc'
18:03:23 <noonedeadpunk> o/
18:03:33 <knikolla> #link https://us06web.zoom.us/j/87108541765?pwd=emlXVXg4QUxrUTlLNDZ2TTllWUM3Zz09#success
18:03:54 <knikolla> Hi all, this is the week where the meeting happens on Zoom
18:03:59 <knikolla> #topic Roll call
18:04:00 <gmann> o/
18:04:14 <spotz[m]> o/
18:04:23 <dansmith> o/
18:04:34 <knikolla> o/
18:05:50 <knikolla> #topic Extended Maintenance
18:05:52 <knikolla> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-exteneded-maintenance
18:06:05 <rosmaita> o/
18:22:09 <fungi> fwiw, adding groups to a gerrit acl is fairly straightforward. it can be done on a per-repo/acl basis or inherited by multiple repos/acls from a centralized parent acl
18:22:46 <fungi> i still wouldn't want to go to the trouble of setting that up unless there are people who want to be added
18:24:35 <fungi> also these are all basically things we already tried to encode in uc policy from the beginning (separate maintainers, removing ci jobs, et cetera), i guess we just failed to say that we really meant it?
18:32:50 <fungi> for clarity, branches don't really get "renamed" they get created and deleted
18:33:09 <fungi> we would branch unsupported/rocky from stable/rocky and then delete the stable/rocky head
18:34:29 <fungi> also existing changes for stable/rocky would need to be abandoned (and then recreated if desired)
18:39:20 <fungi> having the flexibility to adjust our processes based on changes in legislation is good, but i don't think we can base decisions on anything which hasn't become law
18:39:50 <dansmith> yeah that's okay
18:39:53 <fungi> effort is better spent on helping lobby for reasonable legislation
18:44:56 <fungi> there's no reason we can't tag the last commit on stable/train as train-eol and then branch unsupported/train from the train-eol tag once someone decides they need to port a patch to that branch (it's still past the end of its life)
19:04:50 <fungi> i appreciated closing on a jonathan swift reference
19:05:35 <knikolla> #endmeeting