08:01:23 <yasufum> #startmeeting tacker
08:01:24 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jul 14 08:01:23 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is yasufum. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:01:25 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
08:01:27 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'tacker'
08:02:25 <keiko-k> Hello
08:03:17 <yasufum> I would like to check status of specs proposed at previous vPTG.
08:04:10 <yasufum> It is about one month and half from the event, but some specs are still remanined.
08:05:03 <yasufum> Are there still under working specs? Or ready to be merged?
08:05:46 <keiko-k> I have 2 specs remained.
08:05:50 <takahashi-tsc> Sorry but my 2 specs are remained.
08:05:53 <yasufum> Could you tell me if you can answer at this time, or leave a comment in gerrit later[
08:06:08 <keiko-k> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/731715/
08:07:18 <takahashi-tsc> Thank you for the comment about Robot specs, my team have already discussed it, I'll update the spec soon, probably tomorrow.
08:07:22 <keiko-k> This spec needs community reviews. already got one +2. need to get another +2
08:08:12 <yoshito-ito> I have two specs left and they might be updated in the detailed design process, I'll update the status later in gerrit.
08:08:14 <keiko-k> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/731718/     this spec is WIP. this week I will fix it. So please review it.
08:08:59 <takahashi-tsc> Action Driver spec are almost completed, but I'll update some impact and work item by this week. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740896/
08:09:34 <yasufum> OK, thank you for sharing
08:10:13 <yasufum> keiko-k: For patches required another +2, I will ask cores to review it.
08:10:34 <keiko-k> yasufum thanks!
08:10:42 <makoto-ha> I have 1 spec remained.
08:13:52 <yasufum> makoto-ha: Did you complete to fix all comments?
08:14:55 <yasufum> I just want to know about the current status.
08:16:40 <makoto-ha> yasufum: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/732146/ I'll update this week.
08:17:10 <yasufum> Thanks. I understand.
08:18:21 <yasufum> I have one more thing to share about patch reviewing.
08:18:47 <yasufum> networking-sfc
08:20:50 <yasufum> I have started to review patches of networking-sfc. It seems there are no patches required to be merged urgently.
08:21:23 <yasufum> However, there are several patches needed to be reviewed.
08:22:27 <yasufum> I would like to ask you also review these patches if possible.
08:22:35 <takahashi-tsc> I agree, some bug patch is remained. Sorry for the late but I start to review.
08:24:54 <yasufum> Thanks! Go forward step by step.
08:27:04 <yasufum> Thats all for today from my side.
08:27:36 <yasufum> Is there any topic sharing?
08:28:01 <takahashi-tsc> I'd like to share discussion about TST, sorry but not completed yet, but can I share current ongoing discussion?
08:28:17 <yasufum> Sure!
08:28:20 <takahashi-tsc> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tacker-meeting
08:29:34 <takahashi-tsc> L91- First, we start to write our Tacker's test strategy. , UT is same as before, FT is little difficult to discuss... So I'd like to our "compliance test".
08:29:53 <takahashi-tsc> I'd like to clarify our "compliance test"
08:30:59 <takahashi-tsc> In my opinion, compliance test should be the test code provided by ETSI NFV, and should not be changed.
08:33:05 <takahashi-tsc> And I want to ask TST members to make document about coverage which related to compliance, like L106-
08:34:22 <takahashi-tsc> Best documentation is full matrix table, but I think it is too large... At least, we need some document with which we can understand current TST code coverage.
08:35:40 <yasufum> You mean that you are going to ask ETSI TST to provide pretty formatted docs for understanding easily, right?
08:37:41 <yoshito-ito> Let me confirm what coverage you mean. TST code coverage of TST definition? or TST code coverage of SOL definition?
08:38:38 <takahashi-tsc> Right. I think Tacker need/should show compliance coverage , and in my opinion, TST members should make base documentation for compliance coverage.
08:39:05 <takahashi-tsc> coverage means TST code coverage of SOL definition, I think.
08:41:16 <yoshito-ito> OK, thanks.
08:42:14 <yoshito-ito> I agree. We need to show our couverage of SOL specs, and the document will help us for it a lot.
08:43:24 <yoshito-ito> I belive the document needs to be generated automated way like api doc because it may be changed oftern according to the branch update.
08:44:33 <takahashi-tsc> I agree. Making full document manually is difficult to continue...
08:46:12 <yasufum> Are ETSI positive to introduce some framework or way of autogeneration?
08:46:43 <takahashi-tsc> I'm not sure... But I should propose it.
08:46:49 <yasufum> I’m not sure how they are thinking
08:47:01 <yasufum> OK. understand.
08:47:11 <takahashi-tsc> It is one discussion point, thanks.
08:47:28 <yasufum> I believe it must be so helpful for tacker dev!
08:48:30 <takahashi-tsc> OK, at next TST meeting, I have 2 topics. 1 is above, making coverage document. Another is about input parameter, but it is still under discussing... I think we will update etherpad by Thursday.
08:49:49 <takahashi-tsc> If possible please make comment after I update etherpad.
08:50:39 <yoshito-ito> Good. I will.
08:50:44 <masazumi-ota> OK I'll check it.
08:50:51 <yasufum> Could you tell me when the next TST meeting will be held?
08:51:49 <takahashi-tsc> Actually today... But I skip.  I'll join on 28th July.
08:52:19 <yasufum> I see, thanks
08:54:18 <takahashi-tsc> https://portal.etsi.org/Meetings.aspx#/meeting?MtgId=38457
08:54:23 <takahashi-tsc> This is meeting link
08:55:29 <yoshito-ito> Can I share a small topic about implementation?
08:55:44 <yasufum> yes, please go a head
08:56:29 <yoshito-ito> Related to my spec of adding Artifact API, LiangLu posted a patch. It is still WIP but I welcome feedback.
08:57:04 <yoshito-ito> I've already made some comments.
08:57:26 <yoshito-ito> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739697/
08:57:28 <Liang> and here is the link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739697/ :)
08:57:53 <yoshito-ito> Thank you Liang!
08:59:37 <Liang> I should thank you for starting the topic :)
09:01:04 <yoshito-ito> We are running out of time?
09:01:39 <yasufum> Yes. I would like wrap up if everyoen is OK.
09:01:57 <takahashi-tsc> Nothing from me
09:02:12 <yasufum> Thank you for joining
09:02:16 <yasufum> bye
09:02:17 <takahashi-tsc> thanks
09:02:20 <yoshito-ito> thank you
09:02:28 <yasufum> #endmeeting