04:33:59 #startmeeting tacker 04:34:00 Meeting started Wed Sep 27 04:33:59 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gongysh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 04:34:01 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 04:34:03 The meeting name has been set to 'tacker' 04:34:09 diga, thanks 04:34:12 o/ 04:34:16 gongysh: :) NP 04:34:21 o/ 04:34:22 the new mac pro's keyboard is wierd. 04:34:26 o/ 04:34:28 o/ 04:34:33 o/ 04:35:35 Today, we will have a short meeting. 04:35:43 #topic bp 04:36:10 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/501792/ 04:36:11 patch 501792 - tacker-specs - Support Kubernetes as VIM in Tacker 04:36:22 phuoc_, hi 04:36:34 gongysh, hi 04:36:46 I have a comment about the NFV resource template using k8s template. 04:36:59 I saw it 04:37:14 I think we should still use previous nfv resource template, and do k8s translator. 04:37:31 so that we can have a unified tosca template for both vnf and c-vnf. 04:37:48 but currently, K8s translator is not implemented 04:38:03 phuoc_, we should have it in our own project. 04:38:08 and there are some problems 04:38:22 I mean implement the translator our own at tacker repo. 04:38:27 example Kubernetes have many templates for their resources 04:38:56 I want to do it but it have many issues need to figure out 04:39:30 I will contact to mr Sidhar and find the good solution for it 04:39:32 phuoc_, this is the way we should do. please consider refactoring the spec. 04:39:52 gongysh, I got it 04:40:14 IMO, Tacker should implement c-VNFM for managing c-VNF 04:40:20 Hi, about the bp https://review.openstack.org/#/c/502216/ 04:40:20 patch 502216 - tacker-specs - Enabling VNF high availability deployment and man... 04:40:38 longkb_, welcome to tacker meeting 04:40:46 I and xuan0802 want to enable HA for VNF deployment 04:40:59 to promote the spec, you need active involvement. 04:41:22 We make a comparision between some direction https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1lNezvekxTs4wDjCtfdpPkVZfUuLcPSBzExPV1lpT2d4/edit?usp=sharing 04:41:40 could you guy put a comment on the Google docs file :) 04:41:59 and do you have any idea about how to implement it? 04:43:12 I plant to deploy the VNF as Active-Active or Active-standby redundancy model :) 04:44:34 longkb_, even with your proposal, you will need a poc implement to get the spec merged. 04:46:04 longkb_, It is good to have it implemented in tacker repo which will allow us to have great control. 04:46:12 Ok. I will try to make a code for review ASAP. 04:46:54 longkb_, the spec's idea is itself fine. 04:47:17 Thanks gongysh :) 04:47:36 Hello, Please could you see a comment on my blueprint?https://review.openstack.org/#/c/505466/ 04:47:37 patch 505466 - tacker-specs - Zabbix Plugin for Application Monitoring in Tacker... 04:48:39 MinWookKim, hi 04:48:45 welcome into tacker 04:49:07 gongysh, Hello :) 04:49:12 MinWookKim, welcome 04:49:28 YanXing_an, could you track this spec? 04:49:32 YanXing_an, Hello :) 04:49:35 Welcome to Tacker, MinwooKim :) 04:50:14 longkb_, Hello Nice to meet you :) 04:50:14 YanXing_an, helo 04:50:30 gongsh, ok, i will review this patch these days 04:50:31 MinWookKim: Welcome to Tacker! 04:50:49 diga, Hello thanks a lot :) 04:51:09 #topic document 04:51:35 as you know, we will have to manage our document since the refactor of openstack doc. 04:52:11 so you guys can find time to write document about tacker. 04:52:50 I have two patched merged: 1. to install tacker via kolla, 2. separate tacker with target vim. 04:53:02 MinWookKim, it's useful to monitor vnf at app level 04:53:23 next will be 1. openstack target vim installation in kolla way. 04:53:40 2. tacker horizon usage 04:54:17 if you guys are interested in these tasks, you can pick. 04:54:35 YanXing_an, Thanks a lot. I will improve this proposal 04:55:04 #topic open discussion 04:55:28 YanXing_an, I forgot your bp: ns with vnffg 04:56:01 gongysh: for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/505602/, I think we should merge it soon 04:56:02 patch 505602 - tacker - Index block_storage_usage_guide doc 04:56:41 gongysh, i am writing the specs about indirect mode vnf and VeVnfm reference point, ns-vnffg is still coding 04:58:23 gongysh: we need sometime for writing spec, because there is lot of study involved in indirect vnf feature 04:58:43 YanXing_an, diga yes 04:58:59 gongysh: i believe we will cordinate in between and will come up with base spec till next meeting 04:59:59 gongysh: because there are lot of thing are unclear yet, need to investigate more 05:00:53 gongysh: this is large feature 05:01:17 yeah 05:01:37 agree 05:01:40 gongysh: I appreciate YanXing_an for his thought to proposing this feature 05:02:10 YanXing_an, but please make the essential feature work first. ns vnffg 05:03:09 gongysh, ok, got it 05:03:20 anything else? 05:04:13 30 secs count down 05:04:27 nothing from my side 05:04:41 we should check it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/505602/ 05:04:42 patch 505602 - tacker - Index block_storage_usage_guide doc 05:05:02 phuoc_, have commented. 05:05:07 user can have doc and use block storage in Tacker :) 05:05:38 gongysh, my mistake :) 05:06:14 ok. if nothing, we can end today's meeting. please make active contribution. thanks 05:06:20 #endmeeting