21:00:09 #startmeeting swift 21:00:09 Meeting started Wed Oct 13 21:00:09 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is timburke_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:00:09 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:00:09 The meeting name has been set to 'swift' 21:00:17 who's here for the swift meeting? 21:00:23 o/ 21:00:34 o/ 21:01:33 o/ 21:01:56 as usual, the agenda's on the wiki 21:02:00 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Swift 21:02:16 not too much to bring up -- big thing is... 21:02:21 #topic PTG next week 21:02:47 \o/ (I only just remember to register, felt like PTG snuck up on me). 21:02:53 we've got some good topics going on the etherpad 21:02:55 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/swift-ptg-yoga 21:03:06 and if you haven't already, please do register 21:03:14 #link https://www.eventbrite.com/e/project-teams-gathering-october-2021-tickets-161235669227 21:04:36 hmm... i should contact Arkady about where to meet for that first interop session 21:05:10 (that's at 1600 UTC on monday for anyone else interested; i'll update the etherpad when i know more) 21:05:37 first already-booked room is for 2100-2400 in Havana 21:06:10 1600 UTC is alittle late for me, but I can try. (3am) :) 21:06:36 I don't know how important that interop thing is, but I put it on anyway. 21:06:51 yeah, i wouldn't worry about it mattoliver -- better to be rested for the next session ;-) 21:07:43 +1 21:07:44 Our management is quite obsessed with the interop at PTG. In their eyes it is the sole justification to have a PTG at all, because otherwise the projects could just meet on their own. 21:09:21 zaitcev, what are your thoughts on whether we ought to push for more of our recent features being added to the interop guidelines? 21:10:20 i ... don't know that i care much 21:10:35 timburke_: What do you have in mind, exactly? My guess is that it's always good to remind everyone in OpenStack that we're still a part, even after the attempts a year ago to make Swift a second class project. 21:10:55 However, if it takes effort on your part, then whatever 21:11:37 idk -- we could push to add the new object versioning APIs or something 21:11:59 oh, you mean to Tempest 21:13:06 i'm thinking of it more from the perspective of trademark issues -- being able to say something is "Swift-compatible" for example. though i think tempest does play a part in that conversation 21:13:43 It was not supposed to be a conformance suite originally, but many people behave as if it was. 21:13:45 i suppose we'll hear more on monday :-) 21:13:50 ok 21:14:17 any other questions or concerns about the PTG? 21:15:12 #topic ring v2 21:15:36 i just wanted to mention some progress here 21:16:04 i pushed up some new patches to address mattoliver's comments so far 21:17:08 and even rebased https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/792075 onto it so we'll have a concrete benefit that we can look at while evaluating the lead-up 21:17:58 Is that really a ring v2 patch? 21:18:17 it's the end of the chain, in essence 21:18:17 Oh, "and even" 21:18:42 yup! needs the last-primary table, which needs the new format. it's a bit of a yak 21:18:45 Right, they are on the right side of the page. 21:19:31 thanks for cleaning that last one up. There were a few differrent approaches I was playing with, so it kinda got littered with random code from other options while I was testing each approach. 21:19:36 i'm excited about the series, though -- we've got some big expansions planned, and it'd be pretty cool if we had reasonable rebalance times without needing to turn on handoffs_only 21:19:56 +100 21:20:11 that's all i've got 21:20:18 #topic open discussion 21:20:29 what else should we bring up before the ptg? 21:21:11 So it starts next week. I think good to remind (I know you did earlier), add anything you want to talk about to the etherpad 21:22:05 random 1/2 baked thoughts, doesn't matter we can go through them in the first session :) 21:23:03 so much that ^^^ 21:23:34 also, i'll plan another ops feedback session -- is there any particular slot that people think would work best? 21:24:27 Probably better to be euro/us time focused.. although it's hard for us APAC.. just try not to make it too late 21:25:07 so long as that's ok with seongsoocho as he's an APAC op. 21:25:57 10/21 13:00 utc is better for me :) 21:26:25 yup that works for me too. 21:27:01 i'm guessing it'll be good for our guys in taiwan, too -- i should be sure to invite them 21:27:04 I wonder if we should ask reid_g if they're interested in the ops feedback session. 21:27:18 good idea, for sure! 21:27:22 timburke_: +1 21:29:28 all right, i'll put together an ops feedback etherpad and tentatively plan for 10/21 for the ops feedback session 21:29:58 Who else do we know? DHE? 21:31:38 Yeah, we should make an announcement in the channel.. this channel 21:31:55 could see if sorrison is interested :-) or ormandj (though i'm not sure if i've seen him around since the move to OFTC...) 21:32:36 Maybe to the mailing list too, as thats where ops may be lingering, just keeping an ear to the ground. 21:32:44 for sure 21:33:12 i think i'll call it then, and let everyone get on with their day :-) 21:33:31 thank you all for coming, thank you for working on swift, and i look forward to seeing you guys monday! 21:33:35 #endmeeting