21:00:20 <notmyname> #startmeeting swift
21:00:21 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Oct 10 21:00:20 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is notmyname. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:00:22 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:00:24 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'swift'
21:00:27 <notmyname> who's here for the swift team meeting
21:00:28 <timburke> o/
21:00:30 <m_kazuhiro> o/
21:00:34 <kota_> hello
21:00:40 <rledisez> hi o/
21:01:07 <mattoliverau> o/
21:01:09 <notmyname> welcome
21:01:37 <notmyname> I myself just got off a plane. had a customer meeting this week, so I'm a bit tired. I vote we have a short meeting :-)
21:01:45 <notmyname> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Swift
21:02:18 <notmyname> the agenda doesn't look like anything specific has been added, so let's do like we did last week with a quick overview of what's going on
21:02:43 <mattoliverau> Kk
21:02:46 <notmyname> priority reviews page still looks accurate. nothing's been added, nothing's been merged
21:02:48 <notmyname> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/PriorityReviews
21:03:19 <notmyname> still looks like there's some waiting for patch authors. I didn't see any obvious waiting on reviewers there
21:03:39 <notmyname> oh, maybe the account undelete patch wanted some clarity from you mattoliverau on your review
21:04:03 <mattoliverau> Yeah,  im part way throigh a review there
21:04:08 <notmyname> cool, thanks
21:04:12 <notmyname> m_kazuhiro: any updates on the general task queue work this week?
21:04:59 <m_kazuhiro> mattoliverau added some reviews and I updated patch for them.
21:05:08 <mattoliverau> Nice
21:05:13 <kota_> nice
21:05:20 <notmyname> that's great
21:05:38 <mattoliverau> Im working on a follow patch to clean up the exirer docs a bit
21:05:43 <notmyname> cool
21:06:20 <notmyname> rledisez: anything to share on LOSF this week?
21:07:04 <rledisez> notmyname: nothing specific, we've been working on improving performance of SSYNC over LOSF, it's going fine for now
21:07:34 <notmyname> rledisez: interesting
21:07:53 <notmyname> that makes me think about what we want to do long-term with ssync anyway
21:08:12 <rledisez> notmyname: we are thinking of that too :)
21:08:24 <notmyname> or rather, does it make sense to improve ssync for lsof or just actually get started on tsync?
21:09:12 <notmyname> rledisez: *please* share your thoughts on the matter. either on the ideas wiki page or in irc or email or something. don't let it stay in ovh :-)
21:09:18 <rledisez> notmyname: I know alecuyer would like to dev something else, my opinion is that now ssync is getting stable, i would prefer to improve it instead of starting again something new and with new bugs
21:09:42 <rledisez> so, for now we are profiling ssync
21:10:39 <notmyname> we at swiftstack have started talking about what big swift thing we need to prioritize next. so (among other things) we've been talking about tsync vs losf. both are good, but it makes more sense to work together than separately
21:11:23 <kota_> sounds reasonable story
21:11:30 <rledisez> sure
21:11:32 <mattoliverau> +100 for together in community :)
21:11:36 <notmyname> :-)
21:11:49 <rledisez> we won't start a tsync dev without any discussion
21:11:56 <notmyname> good:-)
21:12:48 <notmyname> timburke: anything to share on s3 patches? just the stuff on the reviews page?
21:13:38 <notmyname> timburke: and thanks for continuing to clean up the gate jobs. the coverage change you proposed seems reasonable
21:14:29 <notmyname> hmm... I think timburke may have said hi and then sneaked out!
21:14:39 <mattoliverau> Lol
21:14:41 <kota_> lol
21:14:51 <notmyname> anything else from anyone? anything you want to bring up or questions or help you need?
21:15:49 <notmyname> ok, I'll take that as "no"
21:16:07 <notmyname> thank you very much for your work on swift
21:16:15 <notmyname> and thansk for coming today
21:16:19 <notmyname> #endmeeting