21:00:30 <notmyname> #startmeeting swift
21:00:31 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jul 18 21:00:30 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is notmyname. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:00:32 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:00:35 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'swift'
21:00:38 <notmyname> who's here for the swift team meeting?
21:00:47 <m_kazuhiro> o/
21:01:08 <rledisez> hi o/
21:01:21 <mattoliverau> o/
21:01:48 <notmyname> wecome
21:02:21 <notmyname> agenda this week is pretty much the same as last, so it should go quickly, I think
21:02:23 <notmyname> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Swift
21:02:30 <tdasilva> hi
21:02:48 <notmyname> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427911/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447129 are two patches I'm watching to hope they land soon
21:02:49 <patchbot> patch 427911 - swift - Replace MIME with PUT+POST for EC and Encryption
21:02:50 <patchbot> patch 447129 - swift - Configure diskfile per storage policy
21:03:51 <notmyname> zaitcev: hello
21:04:01 <notmyname> I'd just mentioned https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427911/
21:04:02 <patchbot> patch 427911 - swift - Replace MIME with PUT+POST for EC and Encryption
21:04:14 <notmyname> how's that patch going? do you need any help?
21:04:26 <zaitcev> I need to rebase it, because its (only) dependency was merged, thanks to Matt.
21:04:34 <zaitcev> Otherwise it's perfect
21:05:00 <notmyname> cool
21:05:11 <notmyname> that sounds like pretty good news
21:05:32 <zaitcev> Alistair didn't like the dot-in-path. I never understood his argumentation against it... Possibly it injured his sense of the proper design. He has an alternative, based on Content-Type.
21:06:09 <notmyname> yeah, he and I talked about those options. or maybe just in the etherpad
21:06:16 <notmyname> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swift-put-post
21:06:18 <zaitcev> That patch looks okay to me. A previous version had a fatal flaw: it wasn't future-proof. He promised to fix that, I need to verify.
21:07:04 <notmyname> ok
21:07:23 <zaitcev> https://review.openstack.org/582298
21:07:23 <patchbot> patch 582298 - swift - PUT+POST: Detect older object server by not sendin...
21:07:58 <zaitcev> notmyname: you can break our tie as our leader!
21:08:00 <mattoliverau> There's a lot to get into my head there, I'll try and read up on the patches and give em a test and review
21:08:18 <tdasilva> same here
21:08:25 <notmyname> mattoliverau: tdasilva: thanks
21:08:53 <zaitcev> Oh come on. It's like 7% complexity level of EC.
21:09:00 <zaitcev> Or maybe 4%
21:09:05 <mattoliverau> Lol
21:09:52 <notmyname> anything else to bring up on that patch functionality?
21:11:04 <notmyname> on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447129, IIRC clayg said he was going to look at it, but I know he's been busy with other stuff
21:11:04 <patchbot> patch 447129 - swift - Configure diskfile per storage policy
21:11:17 <notmyname> m_kazuhiro: could you review that patch please?
21:11:43 <m_kazuhiro> ok
21:11:49 <notmyname> thank you
21:12:27 <notmyname> mattoliverau: you'll be pushing a small update to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541058/, right?
21:12:28 <patchbot> patch 541058 - swift - Add fallocate_reserve to account and container ser...
21:12:34 <notmyname> and then landing it?
21:13:20 <mattoliverau> Yup, pushed up one with a comment last night
21:13:27 <notmyname> oh, ocol
21:13:51 <notmyname> but were you going to +2/+A?
21:13:55 <mattoliverau> Was waiting for Gerrit
21:13:59 <notmyname> ah
21:14:08 <mattoliverau> Will do it after breakfast :)
21:14:13 <notmyname> kk
21:14:23 <notmyname> looks like a probe test failure. not sure if real or not
21:14:30 <zaitcev> well
21:14:54 <zaitcev> I noticed we're getting a ton of those probe tests failures recently, especially sharder related.
21:15:00 <notmyname> hmm
21:15:07 <tdasilva> mm..clayg pointed me to that failure last week on another patch
21:15:12 <zaitcev> At first I thought I induced them, but trunk is the same
21:15:52 <notmyname> ok, so something else to track down
21:16:17 <notmyname> I made a note
21:17:02 <notmyname> as a reminder, I'll propose an authors/changelog patch for python-swiftclient. it needs to be tagged next week
21:17:15 <notmyname> if there's anything you want in swiftclient, please work with someone to get it landed this week
21:17:29 <notmyname> (all the current open stuff that was ready to land has already landed)
21:17:31 <mattoliverau> Maybe we need a section on priority reviews about bugs and investigations. There are a few sharing ones I'd like to look into when I have the time.
21:17:46 <mattoliverau> Ie somewhere to put the note
21:17:53 <notmyname> mattoliverau: good idea. I had a couple of bugs listed at the bottom
21:17:56 <notmyname> but yeah, I'll do that
21:18:10 <zaitcev> In the times before PUT+POST, I pooh-pooed probe tests. But during PUT+POST there was a time when we had functests passing, but probe tests broke and it totally was my fault. After that I realized that functests aren't good enough. BTW, not in-process. Even real functests.
21:18:10 <notmyname> much better than in my own todo list :-)
21:18:55 <notmyname> tests are great!
21:19:22 <notmyname> anything else to bring up in today's meeting?
21:21:16 <notmyname> all right. let's end the meeting then
21:21:21 <notmyname> thanks for your work on swift!
21:21:27 <notmyname> #endmeeting