19:02:24 #startmeeting storyboard 19:02:25 Meeting started Wed May 30 19:02:24 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is SotK. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:02:26 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 19:02:28 The meeting name has been set to 'storyboard' 19:02:43 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/StoryBoard#Agenda_for_next_meeting Agenda 19:03:10 #topic Forum Recap 19:03:31 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/continuing-the-migration-lp-sb 19:03:38 So I think our migration discussion went pretty well. 19:03:51 People seemed to be on board and impressed with the progress we had made so far. 19:04:08 I think migrating roughly a project a week there for the last month and a half really helped :) 19:04:37 It didn't seem like anyone had any new blocking issues so that was nice to hear as well 19:04:47 yeah I thought it was a good session 19:05:03 At this point I think most of the work is just nice to haves/ removing annoyances 19:05:21 I agree on the whole 19:05:23 And continuing to migrate folks. 19:05:39 we need to fix the search slowness when tags are involved though, that is pretty painful 19:05:51 SotK, agreed. 19:06:06 Maybe a little more than an annoyance at this point. 19:06:40 we are also updating our deployment of the webclient to keep things up to date on the infra side 19:06:46 (that came up in the storyboard session) 19:07:14 Oh yes that would be great. 19:07:16 I just saw that in the infra channel, thanks for fixing up the puppet :) 19:07:30 Yes thank you :) 19:08:10 There was a discussion on Thursday I think about S release goals. I had to cut out early so maybe fungi can summarize the sb part of that convo better? 19:08:37 I know some of the build up was that we need goals that look good or are benefits to operators/users 19:09:02 So storyboard has much less weight, but I think it was still in the running as something to make all our lives easier 19:10:21 I have the goal all ready to go, I was kind of just waiting for us to finish migrating tripleO so we had two bigger projects under our belt. 19:11:13 I think waiting for tripleO is sensible, it gives that bit more weight to the idea 19:13:12 My thoughts exactly. 19:13:26 Anyone know M2 date off the top of their head? 19:15:27 https://releases.openstack.org/rocky/schedule.html suggests next week 19:16:11 SotK, woot. So then I thiiink- I will double check- but I thiiiink that TripleO was going to target the migration around then. 19:16:36 They had tools they needed to update first, but wanted to be switched before M3 19:16:53 I will add a todo for myself to check in and see how that is going. 19:17:15 cool, thanks 19:17:36 I guess we're kind of into Migration Updates now 19:17:40 #topic Migration Updates 19:18:32 So, obviously havent migrated anyone lately, but OS-Helm is ready to take the plunge. 19:18:43 * diablo_rojo is replying to an email now proposing next Friday 19:19:06 So we should have them for next week. 19:19:11 nice! 19:19:19 Maybe, if TripleO is all set, we can do them the week after? 19:19:36 Unless they are super on the ball and already have their tools ready. 19:19:46 Then maybe we can do both next week. 19:20:01 fungi, would you have time next friday to migrate at least OS-Helm? 19:20:47 sure 19:21:04 Now that Summit is done and I have time to start doing test migrations again I will do Keystone next as they have waited so patiently :) 19:21:07 and yeah, there was no real goal conversation 19:21:08 fungi, awesome 19:21:32 just enough time for me to squeeze in the sb migration goal pitch at the end 19:21:48 most of the goals session was spent discussing past goals and the selection process 19:22:04 * fungi only just remembered the meeting, sorry! 19:22:15 It was an interesting conversation and recap, though not what I expected it to be. 19:22:20 fungi, no worries :) 19:24:38 any other migration updates? 19:25:07 Uhhh don't think so. Really just had OSH, TripleO and Keystone things 19:25:20 #topic In Progress Work 19:26:11 clarkb just fixed deployment of sb-wc in the puppet module (we think) 19:26:30 \o/ 19:26:33 we'll know for sure in some number of minutes 19:26:56 didn't want to try and troubleshoot further in the middle of the summit 19:27:11 makes sense 19:27:38 Totally reasonable 19:27:40 the partial fix from the summit meant that a few of the Octavia issues are now fixed anyway 19:28:09 yeah, production is basically up to date already, at least 19:31:01 * SotK hasn't got any real updates on his in progress things to talk about really, I'm not entirely sure what happened to last week 19:31:33 At some point we should go over that list again to make sure stories exist for everything- I know I wrote down which ones needed it but haven't made them myself yet 19:32:07 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/storyboard-issues 19:32:09 SotK, if its any consolation, this is the most time I have spent on my laptop actually working since last week. 19:33:18 heh, I've done plenty of work just not storyboard related :( 19:33:51 SotK, I saw fatema_ had been around? You were helping her a bit? 19:33:59 yeah, to your credit diablo_rojo, you _were_ "actually working" last week 19:34:29 I'm catching up on the "not" working that happened last week 19:34:38 fungi, different kind of work I suppose :) 19:34:42 diablo_rojo: this is true 19:34:44 clarkb, yeah same 19:34:47 tosky gave fatema_ some pointers about installation issues, i think 19:34:48 git.openstack.org should be happier for our users now and now on to storyboard weblicnet deployments that we broke last week :) 19:35:08 clarkb, woot woot! 19:35:23 then its update things to handle changes to ansible then maybe I can look at things that came out of the summit itself :) 19:36:12 #topic Open Discussion 19:36:18 Yeah trying to do all the catchup things before getting into summaries, recaps etc. 19:36:41 I saw a ML thread the otherday about issues with fontawesome that I wasnt sure we needed to be aware of 19:37:02 Didn't read the whole thing but I wanted to point it out in case it was important 19:38:56 * SotK had a read of it earlier, unless I'm missing something it shouldn't affect us since we get the relevant version of font-awesome from npm, build it into our tarball and then serve the font with the webclient 19:39:39 the "font-awesome decided to break everything" made https://review.openstack.org/#/c/545676/ a pain though and is the reason for my Workflow -1 on it 19:40:14 yeah, had to do with debian packaging where the packaged xstatic-fontawesome is a wrapper around the fontawesome distro package which in debian is 5.x whil horizon is being tested against fontawesome 4.x 19:40:18 something along those lines 19:41:09 Okay cool never mind then :) 19:42:04 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack-infra/storyboard+branch:master+topic:538575 19:42:22 just putting that there to try and close it out, I don't think there are any major objections on it 19:43:55 mtreinish: thanks for the reminder, I'll try to go through and approve it soon 19:44:06 SotK: cool, thanks 19:44:37 thanks for the reminder :) 19:46:47 anything else to discuss? 19:46:54 nothing from me 19:46:58 Not that I can think of 19:47:50 Thanks for hosting SotK :) 19:48:15 you're welcome :) 19:48:22 thanks for your time folks 19:48:25 #endmeeting