19:00:48 #startmeeting storyboard 19:00:49 Meeting started Wed Mar 15 19:00:48 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is zara_the_lemur__. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:00:50 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 19:00:52 The meeting name has been set to 'storyboard' 19:01:02 #topic Announcements 19:01:26 Monasca intends to migrate to StoryBoard after 20UTC Monday 19:01:34 PUT IT IN YOUR CALENDARS 19:01:43 \o/ 19:01:56 also refstack and defcore :) 19:02:03 ah, was that at the same time, I missed that! 19:02:05 wonderful 19:02:22 #topic Urgent Items 19:02:33 based on that, I would say the branches patch is somewhat urgent 19:02:48 will link shortly 19:03:02 (one day I'll get the hang of opening all my links *before* the meeting) 19:03:06 (but it is not this day) 19:03:17 happily, it's already on my calendar ;) 19:03:25 (the monasca move) 19:03:36 (refstack/defcore too) 19:03:40 we don't *need* the non master branches patch for these projects 19:04:01 ohhhh, in that case that's not urgent then 19:04:44 SotK: do you know if we need the UUID patch ? 19:04:59 oh, diablo_rojo has reviewed that anyway 19:05:01 so I can merge it 19:05:02 ace 19:05:20 moving on, then 19:05:25 #topic In-Progress Work 19:05:36 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/437469/ 19:05:41 that's the branches patch I just mentioned 19:06:06 thanks, diablo_rojo! 19:06:15 (and thanks, SotK, for leaving such detailed feedback) 19:07:08 that's a patch to import non-master branches from launchpad, and I now gather it is not immediately urgent, but the sooner the better. :D 19:07:13 as other projects are likely to need it 19:07:40 the UUID patch to which I just referred was: 19:07:43 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/444593/ 19:08:16 which works around an issue where importing two users with the same name in lp would cause an error and halt the import 19:08:42 I've just +A'd it so hopefully that will merge soon. 19:08:53 yay! 19:08:57 :) 19:08:59 next, some patches I am very excited about... 19:09:14 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/444614/ 19:09:25 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/444644/ 19:09:36 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/444615/ 19:09:43 are these my spectacular board speed patches? :) 19:09:45 YES 19:09:55 I still have not actually had time to test/review them, to my undying shame 19:10:02 but I am so happy even at the idea 19:10:27 :) 19:10:34 they need further work still 19:10:50 well, it has been possible to have children and grandchildren in the time it takes to load a large board, so I'll be pleased if we can reduce it by a generation 19:11:14 (see before I couldn't complain because you'd implemented it, so it would just be mean, but now you've sent a fix so it cancels it out.) 19:11:18 since I forgot to finish a bit of the changes to the story db api 19:11:29 haha 19:11:40 yeah, the times were unacceptably long 19:12:01 I am very pleased about those, thanks so much 19:12:23 we have another patch in review, 19:12:27 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445965/ 19:12:53 It increases the char limit for project and project group names. I've left a comment on the relevant story; I don't know of any reason to oppose it in theory. 19:13:04 I gather the patch itself requires a rework 19:13:24 so if anyone knows a historic reason for that limitation that we should be aware of, speak now or forever hold your peace 19:13:30 * SotK is fine with it once it adds a migration to make the database match the model 19:13:57 I can't remember off the top of my head how the webclient code works with that 19:14:02 and if we'd need to update anything there 19:15:09 other things... 19:15:11 perhaps we would, I don't recall if we have the limit hardcodes there too 19:15:12 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/379595/ 19:15:21 good point :) 19:15:22 (I'll have a quick look after the meeting) 19:15:39 (it wouldn't surprise me) 19:15:48 s/hardcodes/hardcoded/ 19:16:08 the thing linked above is betherly's patch to change less to sass; I left a comment but it pretty much just says 'this is the bit reported in the tests' 19:16:19 I don't know the details around that 19:16:52 * SotK secretly wants to move all the way to sass instead of scss, but that is a bikeshed for the future 19:17:10 so that is likely blocked on someone with more less/sass/css-specific knowledge than I have taking a look 19:17:13 hahaha 19:17:29 well, nobody will fight you but that's probably blocked for the same reason 19:18:03 I said I would look at removing some story_types things so we could move toward flattening our db migrations 19:18:09 then suddenly it was this meeting 19:18:29 so... I haven't even started that. 19:18:43 and now there are board speed patches to try.... 19:19:44 oh, but since they're not ready 19:19:52 maybe I can do some work on that tonight 19:20:00 I'll do that, then, and salvage some pride 19:20:07 :) 19:20:17 you can still sample the speed if you like 19:20:26 you just get the wrong story count 19:20:46 okay, I'll do that (I want to see it!:D), I just won't test toooo thoroughly yet 19:21:15 I think that's it for in-progress work, so will move on... 19:21:21 #topic Discussion 19:21:22 * diablo_rojo sneaks in late 19:21:28 #topic Open Discussion 19:21:50 haha, well now we have a specific section of logs that will just say 'diablo_rojo sneaks in late' 19:21:55 hey diablo_rojo 19:21:59 Got distracted by other things 19:22:01 Sorry! 19:22:02 np :) 19:22:24 I don't have a lot to discuss, am wondering if we should be doing other Boston things. 19:22:28 So, I have reviews I need to do is what I gather from the scrollback 19:23:35 :) 'need' might be a bit strong where things are being reworked 19:23:53 OH ACTUALLY WAIT 19:23:57 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/436702/ 19:23:59 I forgot that 19:24:03 that is waiting on +1s 19:24:07 it has a +2 from me 19:24:19 dmsimard raised it some time ago 19:24:36 (3 weeks, ish) 19:24:42 it fixes a bug in search 19:24:49 I got a new patchset up for my branch handling 19:24:54 could use some more comments 19:24:59 Getting closer I think. 19:25:08 * SotK will attempt to find time to comment 19:25:19 looked much closer at a glance earlier 19:25:31 ah cool, I linked to it but wasn't sure if you were soliciting comments on it yet 19:25:38 Yes please :) 19:25:56 * zara_the_lemur__ links again 19:25:58 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/437469/ 19:28:07 ooh, I like the approach to splitting those urls, suspect you might find they start with a / 19:28:15 (just ran something similar in an editor) 19:28:22 (am worst chair ever) 19:28:52 (since I was like 'oh hey that's a nice way of doing it') 19:28:59 Yeah I need to make a few more tweaks there, I just threw that in as a starting poitn 19:29:01 point 19:29:20 (so then wanted to check if it'd work before I publicly embarrassed myself going 'that's nice' if it didn't work at allxD) 19:29:36 (/end context) 19:29:54 it's looking good at a glance :) 19:31:00 Coolio. If I get comments in the next day or so I can hopefully get a new patch out Friday since I will be gone next week 19:31:36 * SotK will do hos best 19:31:46 s/hos/his/ 19:31:49 okay, prod me if you haven't heard anything from me on Fri and I'll try to at least get something up then 19:32:00 Sounds good. 19:32:57 I don't think I have anything else to discuss today + am wary of keeping folk longer than necessary 19:33:20 so if nobody has anything else to bring up, I'll end the meeting in the next couple of minutes 19:33:21 Everything is good to go for Monday so I think we are good. 19:33:27 \o/ 19:33:43 thanks (and thanks fungi for volunteering to be around!) 19:34:00 yes, thank you! 19:34:03 i'm around anyway ;) 19:34:06 haha 19:34:07 but happy to take that on 19:34:44 tailor my thanks accordingly, then :D 19:34:59 Yes yes thank you fungi :) 19:36:16 welp, adam's left us for the stage once more, so with that... 19:36:19 #endmeeting