15:01:59 #startmeeting storyboard 15:02:00 Meeting started Wed May 11 15:01:59 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Zara. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:02:01 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:02:04 The meeting name has been set to 'storyboard' 15:02:17 #topic Announcements 15:02:22 I have three things! 15:02:40 1, and most urgent-- The next StoryBoard meetup is next Monday! 15:02:43 The 16th May! 15:02:45 Manchester, UK! 15:02:55 standby while I find more info! 15:03:28 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StoryBoard/Milestone_1_Meetup 15:03:33 That's the wiki page 15:03:43 which links to this etherpad, which I'm also going to link, just because 15:03:53 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/StoryBoard_Newton_sprint 15:04:16 some of that is copypasted from the last one 15:04:17 hm 15:04:44 It should get updated over the remainder of this week 15:04:56 and as always, feel free to add things! 15:05:00 * SotK looks forward to cake and storyboard 15:05:19 * Zara hopes for cake and steak 15:05:27 I mean st*oryboard* 15:05:28 * betherly is super sad cant be there 15:05:35 next time! 15:05:45 yeah, it also clashes with OSCON, we're masters at this 15:06:10 anyone have anything else to say on that? 15:06:45 _o_ 15:06:47 Announcement 2, then: newish feature (actually merged just before summit, but got lost in summit frenzy) 15:06:52 automatic worklists in boards! 15:07:18 we should be able to go into that more at the meetup 15:08:05 it does what it says on the tin, but demos are always handy :) 15:08:31 Announcement 3: brand new feature! 15:08:33 Private stories! 15:08:58 You can now make a story private, and whitelist users that can view it. 15:09:13 This is very new so I'd recommend against putting anything super sensitive in one immediately 15:09:40 people should play with them though 15:09:55 yes. story here: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2000568 15:10:00 and thank you SotK for working so hard on this 15:10:06 especially at the summit! 15:10:41 we need people to play with them in order to find all the leaks; we've done a lot of testing but we always miss things, so... I guess it's in beta 15:10:58 woot 15:10:59 * SotK will be surprised if there are leaks :) 15:11:23 will take a look and play around as i go. looks awesome though 15:11:50 I hope you don't get surprised then! :D I'm fine with being shown to be too pessimistic. :) 15:12:12 but yeah, those should be useful for reporting security vulnerabilities in the future 15:13:24 I'll move on, unless we've missed an annoucement 15:13:50 oh, I guess 15:14:09 #info search is throwing errors on storyboard.openstack.org, but it's a known bug and SotK fixed it this afternoon 15:14:29 so we're just waiting for the relevant change to be merged and to build 15:15:00 s.o.o was using an old version of sqlalchemy fulltext search, for the curious 15:15:04 so thanks again SotK for that 15:15:23 s.o.o should be normal again in a few hours, fingers crossed 15:16:20 okay, I think *that*'s everything 15:16:26 #topic Urgent Items 15:16:32 anything? 15:16:59 the search fix was the only thing I had marked 'urgent', and we got reviews for that quickly (thanks, persia!) 15:17:20 * SotK doesn't think there is anything 15:17:57 okay 15:17:58 'LOTS OF CAKES NEEDED FOR MEETUP, VERY URGENT' 15:18:01 moving on 15:18:10 #topic In-Progress Work 15:18:29 * SotK will try to cause cake to be generated over the weekend :) 15:18:32 :d 15:19:10 SotK: I put 'complex priorities-- SotK' on the agenda for inprogress work, but I may have missed things 15:19:13 so over to you! 15:19:42 I sent a patch for this that you don't like, we can discuss that after :) 15:19:56 heehee 15:20:02 I'm also in the process of fixing merge conflicts/improving the old api patches for this 15:20:22 yeah, I don't have a problem with the overall approach, I just don't like that particular ux for it, but +1 to discussing after. 15:20:26 and yes, thank you for those 15:21:14 #info SotK is working on visulasing complex priorities, and better worklist+board filtering 15:21:20 erm, visualising 15:21:59 you can #undo and do it again I think 15:22:15 hm, I'm not sure of the exact command 15:22:35 I'm pretty sure it is `#undo` 15:23:05 #undo 15:23:06 Removing item from minutes: 15:23:10 hah, just looked it up before I saw that 15:23:11 oh well 15:23:21 #info SotK is working on visualising complex priorities, and better worklist+board filtering 15:23:28 there you go 15:23:43 #info Zara is working on creating operator docs for StoryBoard, so people can spin up instances fast 15:23:50 we get a lot of requests for playground instances 15:24:10 #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2000535 15:24:21 I looked at ansible yesterday, hit dead end, trying puppet today 15:24:33 well, in theory. I got distracted by other review 15:24:41 so that might end up being tomorrow 15:25:12 next thing on the list 15:25:44 betherly: I have 'flowy tutorial' down as your inprogress work, but I'm not sure how that's going, while I know you patched other UX fails earlier this week 15:25:51 i am in the process of splitting out some of my work so that the initial patch will literally just be html fragments and something that could actually be merged and still look ok before all the awesome cool other stuff works. also will make the reviewing of it all less painful and less 'oh my days how many lines of code'. sorry havent made much progress 15:25:51 really since disaster #1, decided to focus storyboard wise on more 'fun' (minor) things like that placeholder issue. less depressing ;) 15:25:51 so.. over to you! 15:26:02 (haha I was too slow) 15:26:11 hehe 15:26:36 np, I'm glad someone finally got around to those placeholders! 15:26:37 thanks for those 15:26:40 so basically, there will be something rather than nothing there in the next week but still not a fully functional all bells and whistles doodle bug 15:27:02 something is better than nothing :) 15:27:07 thanks for the placeholders patch btw! 15:27:34 yup :) 15:28:06 woot! 15:28:18 yay for patches that do a bit more than documentation :D 15:28:36 given I still haven't managed to patch ops docs, you're winning! :D 15:28:46 anything else in-progress I've forgotten? 15:29:06 not that I can think of off the top of my head 15:29:06 (aside from the million ongoing threads that don't warrant a mention because they're always there, haha) 15:29:10 eating cake? 15:29:21 pfft, that's next monday 15:29:27 if you eat cake before then, YOU DIE 15:29:31 nah its in-progress here 15:29:33 whaaaaat 15:29:40 :'( 15:29:51 sorry :/ 15:29:58 no discussion topics listed 15:30:03 so... 15:30:09 #topic Open Discussion 15:30:12 DISCUSS 15:32:06 :< 15:33:05 well, following up on summit things... has anyone heard anything from the product working group? 15:33:23 * SotK has not 15:33:35 hm, I haven't either; perhaps someone should poke them on their ML or somesuch. 15:34:10 silence suggests that one's all mine 15:34:45 #action Zara will prod PWG 15:35:34 yay Zara! :) 15:35:40 thanks :) 15:38:13 * Zara tries to think if there are other things 15:38:41 oh, actually, we've talked about it in channel but not here 15:38:54 infra's task-tracking spec is in progress! 15:39:00 \o/ 15:39:28 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314185/ 15:39:37 I keep meaning to comment and getting sidetracked 15:40:29 I'm not sure if line 135 is applicable any more with private stories, or if a more advanced implementation of ACLs is envisioned. 15:41:39 hm, doesn't seem to be an option to link to a line 15:41:52 and... I should've linked that spec properly for the logs 15:41:55 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314185/ 15:42:29 Zara: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314185/2/specs/task-tracker.rst@135 15:42:43 ooh, cool, didn't know that 15:42:44 evidently 15:42:56 I tried clicking '135' but it just gave option to comment 15:42:57 ace 15:43:12 I have no idea how to do it without manually creating the url :) 15:43:15 heh 15:44:11 anyway, yeah, I think it may be a good time to see how far the 'project teams' feature got, to see if we can use it for future ACL work. 15:44:19 but that's just a background investigation... 15:44:44 yeah, we should do that at some point 15:45:56 things that fell by the wayside a bit the last few weeks were the python client updates (inc. from gerrit) 15:46:04 that's because I was working on it, then I had things to review :) 15:47:52 oh, looking at teams in the db schema, the api side looks promising (there are teams, team_permission and team_membership). erm, sorry to jump around (got the schema out to see python client things) 15:49:10 yeah, they seem to be implemented in the api 15:49:15 idk how much they work 15:49:37 yeah, the db side looks similar to other things at a glance, but I have no idea beyond that \o/ 15:49:40 eh, future things 15:50:19 I have a bunch of old patches in review that I hope to go back to since many need reworks 15:50:33 so hoping to get to that next 15:55:29 anything else? 15:55:34 _o_ 15:58:02 #endmeeting