13:02:01 #startmeeting sriov 13:02:02 Meeting started Tue Aug 30 13:02:01 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is moshele. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:02:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:02:05 The meeting name has been set to 'sriov' 13:02:10 o/ 13:02:13 o/ 13:02:13 hi everyone 13:02:19 hi 13:02:25 o/ 13:02:49 #topic agenda SR-IOV/PCI Passthrough CI 13:03:34 our CI had issues with suspend resume test 13:03:57 Hi guys, I have started contributing to nova some time back and uploaded some patches and done some reviews and would love to be a part of this exciting subteam ! 13:04:29 o/ 13:04:30 see https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-August/msg00406.html 13:05:01 prateek: everyone is welcome 13:05:26 moshele, thanks 13:05:34 it seem that there was security patch which cause problem in qemu <2.6 13:06:20 it was revert in Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1612089 13:06:20 Launchpad bug 1612089 in Ubuntu Cloud Archive mitaka "Fix for CVE-2016-5403 causes crash on migration if memory stats are enabled" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Corey Bryant (corey.bryant) 13:06:36 but we still see it in redhat 7.2 13:06:59 yeah, so this patch is still not fixed in qemu tree ? 13:07:56 lbeliveau: I think the fix is working with qemu 2.6 but Ubuntu and redhat backport it to there distro and that cause problems 13:08:06 ok 13:08:33 Ubuntu revert it 13:08:52 we also have the migration patches in tempest 13:09:10 migration test - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339230/ migration revert test - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348498/ 13:09:12 I guess it's happening only with virtio bus, maybe in the meanwhile you can redefine virtio to ide or anything else? 13:10:12 vladikr: currently or CI only run on Ubuntu so this is good for now 13:10:30 ah, ok 13:10:41 anything else on CI? 13:10:48 wznoinsk: can you please help on those tempest test ? 13:11:03 lbeliveau: sure, looking now 13:11:08 they haven't been reviewed yet by any tempest cores 13:11:14 also we need CI for PF-PT 13:11:30 I am not sure if we can do it here in Mellanox 13:12:23 wznoinsk: are you planning to test it on your CI ? 13:13:26 moshele: not at the start, we're only preparing to take on the SRIOV/PCI here 13:13:54 will extend the tempest coverage as we go as well but not add the additional setup 13:14:16 wznoinsk: but Mellanox CI already test SR-IOV so it will be redundant 13:15:00 moshele: I'm not closing the door here, it's best if we could talk in a couple of weeks re PF-PT... I'll know enough to tell you yes/no for sure 13:15:15 ok cool 13:15:36 #topic Patches for Subteam Review 13:15:45 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sriov_meeting_agenda 13:16:03 most of the migration patches are merged 13:16:18 we have only this one Fix drop_move_claim() on revert resize - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349060 13:16:37 and maybe this one pci: in free_device method compare devices according to pci_device id - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347558/ 13:16:44 waiting for jaypipes to review it, but I think he's real busy with RT 13:17:03 lbeliveau: so maybe dansmith can help 13:17:39 I asked him, he looked at the latest patch rev and he was ok with it, but he'd like to see jaypipes review it first 13:17:49 without Fix drop_move_claim() on revert resize - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349060 migration-revert won't work 13:18:11 it would be nice if it could land in this release 13:18:26 let my try to ping him 13:19:30 this is fixed https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1614092 by edand 13:19:30 Launchpad bug 1614092 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "SRIOV - PF / VM that assign to PF does not get vlan tag " [Low,Confirmed] 13:19:41 sorry not this one :) 13:20:25 I mean this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1614086 13:20:25 Launchpad bug 1614086 in neutron "SRIOV- when numvfs=0 SRIOV agent is failed to start " [Low,Fix released] - Assigned to edan david (edand) 13:20:49 yeap, I ran into it as well while testing PF passthrough last week 13:21:03 vladikr: do you have solution to https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1614092 13:21:03 Launchpad bug 1614092 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "SRIOV - PF / VM that assign to PF does not get vlan tag " [Low,Confirmed] 13:21:30 is cloud init an option and we can move it to documentation 13:21:54 haven't looked at this one yet myself ... 13:22:17 moshele, not really.. yes, I was thinking about adding it to the metadata service/configdrive for cloud init to pickup 13:22:43 I brought this idea to danpb and dansmith and they didn't really like it 13:23:13 not sure how else to tackle it - maybe they did get my point then 13:23:26 what was their arguments ? 13:23:30 we can talk about it in the summit 13:24:47 we also plan to deprecate all of the SR-IOV agent config https://review.openstack.org/#/c/360447/ 13:24:49 lbeliveau, their argument was that this is a vehicle to deliver user defined setting and what we want to do should be separate .. 13:25:06 vladikr: I see, thanks 13:25:48 the plan is deprecation ocata 13:26:11 vladikr: there are 4 types of 'metadata' : http://www.madorn.com/openstack-metadata-types.html#.V7MM5vkrIfI 13:26:45 I'm not sure what data (vlan id) the network-data can be carrying tho 13:29:43 perhaps we didn't understand each other. maybe putting it in writing would be easier for everybody 13:29:44 try curl http://169.254.169.254/openstack/2015-10-15/network_data.json from any of your openstack VMs 13:30:29 I guess the point is that the vlan would be automatically set , as oppose to user setting it 13:31:21 sure, network-data is retrieved from neutron, also nothing user can modify AFAICT 13:31:35 only user-data is user-provided, vendor-data, network-data, meta-data not 13:32:48 wznoinsk, ok, thanks, I'll look into that more 13:32:49 anyway, just wanted to point out that maybe one of the other 'metadata' sources is the place to look at 13:33:52 can we move to the next topic? 13:34:18 wznoinsk, yep, I was thinking about this the same way as we did the device-role-tagging - but this is different you are right 13:34:39 moshele, I think yes 13:35:12 #topic Specs for Review 13:35:31 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sriov_meeting_agenda Line 52 13:35:38 I dusted off this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/362287/ 13:36:13 ok I will take a look 13:36:36 if you have SR-IOV spec please add them to the agenda 13:37:18 I just added this Enable to share PCI devices between numa nodes - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/361140/ 13:39:15 also I forgot that the SR-IOV: add agent QoS driver to support egress minimum bandwidth - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347302/ is close for merge 13:39:46 so maybe we will have SR-IOV BWG in newton 13:40:21 Also we are planning to run the in Mellanox SR-IOV the neutron tempest qos tests 13:41:13 ok, anyone want to raise and issue? 13:41:22 I'm good 13:41:55 is anyone going to the summit in Oct? 13:42:13 I'm suppose to have confirmation in 2 weeks 13:42:14 not me.. :/ 13:42:39 not sure yet, will know in a few weeks 13:44:44 ok, if you go let me know so we can meet there 13:44:49 anything else? 13:45:17 one open from me, if ppl didn't figure it out yet 13:45:57 I'm taking the SRIOV/PCI CIs of Intel into my garden, we should be ready with what the two CIs are doing now + more tempest testing before summit, not sure about multinode yet 13:46:20 cool 13:46:32 good news 13:46:40 I'll keep you posted on this meeting, we can figure out what we want to test too 13:47:09 ok cool 13:47:13 13:47:38 #endmeeting