17:00:18 #startmeeting Solum Team Meeting 17:00:18 Meeting started Tue Mar 15 17:00:18 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is devkulkarni. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:20 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:23 The meeting name has been set to 'solum_team_meeting' 17:00:26 #topic Roll Call 17:00:28 Devdatta Kulkarni 17:00:52 Ashish Jain 17:01:05 james li 17:01:26 hi james_li ashishjain 17:01:33 here is the agenda for today's meeting: 17:01:33 hi devkulkarni 17:01:36 Hi devkulkarni 17:01:39 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Solum#Agenda_for_2016-03-15_1700_UTC 17:01:52 I hope vijendar will join us soon 17:02:02 o/ 17:02:08 cool 17:02:11 hi vijendar 17:02:17 we have ashishjain and james_li with us 17:02:23 lets begin 17:02:30 #topic Announcements 17:02:38 1) PTL Elections 17:02:43 http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/089032.html 17:02:48 Candidate proposals due by March 17 23:59 UTC 17:03:14 I will submit my candidacy before the deadline 17:03:37 If any of you want to also submit, make sure that you keep the deadline in mind 17:03:52 last time for some of the projects, folks missed the deadline 17:04:21 2) Ashish Jain to present at IndiaHacks hackathon 17:04:30 https://www.hackerearth.com/indiahacks-conference/ 17:04:41 ashishjain: do you want to update the team about this event? 17:04:44 Yeah 17:04:47 cool 17:04:59 This is in continuation with the hackathon which started a month back, 17:05:12 I see 17:05:32 how did the hackathon go ashishjain? 17:05:33 this is the offline event where there are lot of eminent speakers from lot of organisations - Snapdeal, SAP and many more 17:05:42 cool 17:05:48 Not sure about that devkulkarni 17:05:55 yeah, the speaker panel looks amazing 17:06:09 I have been nominated for hangout section 17:06:17 that's awesome ashishjain 17:06:22 which is going to be around 20 minutes 17:06:42 I am going to talk about openstack and will use solum as examples wherever required 17:06:48 is a hangout session on video, or they are just calling it a hangout session but in reality it will be presentation session? 17:06:54 +1 ashishjain 17:07:06 let us know if you need any help from us 17:07:23 my focus will be mainly on contributions and experiences I have gained till now working on open stack and especially from SOLUM 17:07:28 Sure devkulkarni, 17:07:43 ashishjain: I am sure it will be a great session 17:07:49 also now you can demo it 17:07:50 :) 17:07:57 I would need help from all of you to provide some interesting references, articles on OpenStack and Solum 17:08:02 Yeah devkulkarni 17:08:11 absolutely I can demo some of the stuff too 17:08:25 ashishjain: sure, I can send you some pointers/references 17:08:46 do let us know how it goes afterwards 17:08:53 While I may google out lot of stuff, but something from you all may be very helpful 17:09:03 devkulkarni, looks like I missed a q 17:09:24 so hangout session will be probably sitting around and discussion some thing 17:09:31 ah I see 17:09:33 may be they provide a screen to project something 17:09:42 I see 17:09:44 it will probably be vidoegraphed 17:09:48 oh cool 17:09:51 I will share the link if there is one 17:10:02 yeah, that will be really nice 17:10:10 yeah, 17:10:22 dress rehearsal for austin 17:10:23 :) 17:10:36 I am thinking that we should have a common place to host all such solum specific talks/material 17:10:48 agree — this will be a good dress rehearsal for austin 17:10:53 yeah that would be nice 17:11:04 let me create a section on our wiki 17:11:48 yup 17:11:51 #action devkulkarni to create a section on our wiki to link articles, talks, etc. related to solum from team members 17:12:07 alright.. 17:12:14 the third item in announcements is 17:12:20 3) Updates on end-to-end application deployment in devstack 17:12:27 - Vagrant repo updated: https://github.com/rackerlabs/vagrant-solum-dev 17:12:35 - Steps updated 17:12:40 https://github.com/devdattakulkarni/solum-provenance/blob/master/steps-to-enable-solum-with-devstack 17:13:13 I have updated our vagrant repo by cleaning out some stuff and adding pins to nova neutron and nova-docker 17:13:38 Devkulkarni, it is successful now I have tested it sometime back 17:13:40 the steps listed in the solum-provenance repo was also updated with these pings 17:13:52 ashishjain: that is really good to know 17:13:54 devkulkarni, thanks a lot for fixing all this up 17:14:07 ashishjain: thanks for the patience 17:14:07 I was struggling to build this up from last one week 17:14:24 there are around 3 changes 17:14:29 ashishjain: actually this is the first time that you have got an app in READY state, right? 17:14:31 which I had to do 17:14:37 oh okay 17:14:41 what were the changes? 17:14:52 devkulkarni, no I got it in some instances but it was never consistent 17:14:52 I can update the steps and vagrant 17:15:01 one change is with respect to nova 17:15:06 ashishjain: ah I see 17:15:14 scheduler_driver = filter_scheduler 17:15:25 I keep this as is, 17:15:29 I see 17:15:40 yeah, probably it should be that way 17:15:46 2nd change is, that only n-cpu fails 17:15:52 and not n-sch 17:16:01 yeah, I had noticed that 17:16:04 makes sense 17:16:44 lastly, I wouldnt say it as a change but I had to modify examples/apps/cherrypy.yaml 17:16:45 was there a third change? 17:16:52 oh that's right 17:17:04 we just merged a patch yesterday with fixing cherrypy 17:17:17 where trigger action was test instead of unittest 17:17:22 it was not passing the schema validation 17:17:23 aah okay 17:17:23 yep 17:17:30 this is all 17:17:36 somebody had tried it recently and had filed a bug 17:17:44 cool 17:17:46 okay 17:18:10 ashishjain: I would encourage you to try deploying same app multiple times, and creating and deploying new apps 17:18:26 would be interested in knowing how many of those deploys were successful 17:18:26 sure I will try that out 17:18:40 yeah I agree, we need to test the IPV4 fix as well 17:19:10 if all the deploys work, we would know that we have fixed the random app deploy issue 17:19:20 absolutely 17:19:26 so yeah, do let me know how it goes 17:19:43 alright.. let me go to next topic 17:19:56 #topic Patches for Review 17:20:02 Update example apps 17:20:06 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292554/ 17:20:13 this patch is already merged 17:20:23 but let me give an update about this patch 17:20:36 I am trying to clean up our examples directory 17:20:49 I have added a README 17:21:00 if you add new example apps, please update the README 17:21:19 good point 17:21:41 james_li: I am thinking of adding the java sample app that we had created sometime back 17:21:42 this is nice devkulkarni 17:22:01 I will see if I can contribute some apps to thsi 17:22:12 ashishjain: that will be really awesome 17:22:21 now that you have a working environment 17:22:25 but this will be only a single container app 17:22:26 yeah 17:22:37 ashishjain: yes, these will still be single container apps 17:22:59 but they will still be useful in showcasing the capabilities 17:23:16 yeah 17:23:21 if we can add apps for php, nodejs, java that will be nice 17:23:37 we already have a nodejs app, but I ran into an issue with it 17:23:48 I will share that when we talk about bugs 17:24:09 ashishjain: please contribute any other app that you might have in mind 17:24:17 more the better 17:24:18 sure devkulkarni 17:24:36 ok, lets discuss about some recent bugs 17:24:48 #topic Bug Review 17:24:54 New Bugs 17:25:01 1) Nodejs sample app encountering error in nova. 17:25:06 https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1557085 17:25:06 Launchpad bug 1557085 in Solum "error-deploying-nodejs-application" [Undecided,New] 17:25:34 I cleaned the app file for nodejs app, and tried to deploy it 17:25:51 the deployment failed with a nova error 17:25:54 listed above 17:26:54 another bug which I filed this morning is 17:27:12 2) app delete not deleting apps for failed deployments 17:27:18 https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1557613 17:27:18 Launchpad bug 1557613 in Solum "app-delete-not-deleting-app-for-failed-deployments" [High,New] 17:28:08 what is happening for this is that, if for some reason app deployment has failed, the subsequent 'app delete' is encountering exceptions in solum-deployer 17:28:16 vijendar: have you seen this issue before? 17:29:38 devkulkarni: no 17:29:48 vijendar: oh okay 17:30:14 I planning to debug it to see what is going on 17:30:48 will update the bug with findings 17:30:52 3) App delete receiving stack not found 17:30:58 https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1548382 17:30:58 Launchpad bug 1548382 in Solum "app-delete-receiving-stack-not-found" [Critical,New] - Assigned to Vijendar Komalla (vijendar-komalla) 17:31:15 I believe this is fixed with your recent patch vijendar, right? 17:31:27 devkulkarni: I think so 17:31:36 devkulkarni: will validate 17:31:39 I think so too 17:31:43 yeah that will be nice 17:31:47 I will validate it too 17:31:55 we can close the bug after that 17:32:01 sure 17:32:20 those were the new bugs 17:32:38 ashishjain: you might want to update the bug that you had created about nova commits 17:32:52 you can put the commit that is working for you in the bug comment 17:33:11 sure devkulkarni 17:33:12 and then mark the bug as 'Invalid' 17:33:19 yup 17:33:24 alright 17:33:44 any other bugs that need team discussion? 17:34:52 alright.. lets move to open discussion then 17:34:58 #topic Open discussion 17:35:06 Updates from upstream 17:35:13 1) Gate failure due to changes to config generator namespace issue 17:35:17 http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/089123.html 17:35:59 last week there was a gate failure in solum the cause of which was incorrect namespace usage by cors middleware related oslo patch 17:36:26 the issue was not isolated to solum 17:36:49 but was affecting all the projects which had the cors middleware patch merged 17:37:29 the issue was first detected in solum.. you can read above email about this 17:38:03 folks from oslo team submitted patches to fix the namespace issue in all the projects in which the cors middleware patch was merged 17:38:42 in the meanwhile, I had submitted a patch to our repo to not generate solum configuration on the fly, but use a predefined solum.conf file 17:38:59 we got it was merged asap so as to unblock our gates 17:39:26 nice devkulkarni 17:39:42 once the namespace change patch is merged in all the projects, we can revert to generating solum.conf on the fly 17:40:03 for now, our gates are happy, so it is not an issue 17:40:38 apart from this particular topic, nothing major is happening upstream 17:41:06 may be the ptl nominations this week is the other topic 17:41:23 which I already covered in the announcements 17:41:52 is there anything else that we need to cover today? 17:43:25 if not, we can end the meeting early. you all can get back some time. 17:44:08 alright then.. 17:44:19 thanks ashishjain, vijendar, james_li for joining today 17:44:25 have a great week 17:44:29 thanks devkulkarni 17:44:33 #endmeeting