17:00:12 #startmeeting Solum Team Meeting 17:00:13 Meeting started Tue Oct 13 17:00:12 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is devkulkarni. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:14 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:17 The meeting name has been set to 'solum_team_meeting' 17:00:21 #topic Roll Call 17:00:26 Devdatta Kulkarni 17:01:10 o/ 17:01:20 hi muralia 17:01:25 hey dev 17:01:46 vijendar should be joining us 17:02:10 looks like james_li and datsun180b are out today 17:02:22 hi vijendar 17:02:30 Hi 17:02:37 we have muralia as well 17:02:52 hey 17:02:55 Hi murali 17:02:57 others are probably not around today as I don't see them on the irc channel 17:03:27 ok, we can keep this short 17:03:41 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Solum#Agenda_for_2015-10-13_1700_UTC our agenda 17:03:54 #topic Announcements 17:04:11 1) Solum fish bowl session 17:04:26 It scheduled for Thursday, October 29, 2.40 pm - 3.20 pm 17:04:45 I am working on the presentation.. will be sending draft to you guys once I have it ready 17:05:08 2) Recording everyday successes 17:05:10 nice 17:05:17 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-October/076552.html 17:05:25 I don't know if you saw above email or not 17:05:34 if you haven't yet, take a moment to check it out 17:05:41 the proposal is pretty cool 17:05:45 it is 17:06:12 will take a look 17:06:20 so looks like all we have to do is hashtag success and then write our success note 17:07:04 nice to see you around james_li 17:07:10 Hi devkulkarni 17:07:24 here is today's agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Solum#Agenda_for_2015-10-13_1700_UTC 17:07:48 we were in the announcement topic 17:08:22 so, we should use the hashtag success to mark any small or big achievement related to the project 17:08:54 ok.. moving to the review action items 17:09:05 #topic Review action items 17:09:10 there were none 17:09:29 #topic Blueprint/Bug Review and Discussion 17:09:35 (merged) Update to documentation 17:09:51 thanks muralia, vijendar, james_li for reviewing the docs changes 17:09:57 sure 17:10:00 the patch was merged yesterday 17:10:04 http://docs.openstack.org/developer/solum/getting_started/index.html 17:10:16 above is the link of the official documentation 17:10:28 note that it is different than the solum readthedocs 17:10:48 turns out that, once a project becomes official openstack project, the docs are published on docs.openstack.org 17:11:13 readthedocs is no longer needed 17:11:30 ok 17:11:31 also, something in that job is broken 17:11:38 so it is not updating as required 17:11:53 I chatted with openstack-infra guys 17:12:02 we can possibly retire readthedocs 17:12:21 are there any objections against this? 17:12:41 none from me 17:13:04 cool.. 17:13:04 none from me too 17:13:09 +1 on retire 17:13:14 nice 17:13:31 I will take an action item to figure out what is required to do this 17:13:45 #action devkulkarni to figure out how to retire solum readthedocs 17:14:00 (merged) Fixing a bug in wsme pecan exception wrapper 17:14:12 so just a fyi, this patch merged 17:14:42 so we should not be seeing incorrect exception lines printed on the solum-api logs 17:15:11 vijendar: in your devstack, if you try to create a lp or an app, let me know if you are still seeing an issue related to above 17:15:30 I haven't seen it in my devstack setup 17:15:44 devananda: ok 17:15:58 vijendar: tab completion failure :) 17:16:02 devkulkarni: ok. I did not see any errors recently 17:16:08 vijendar: cool 17:16:26 the next one is (merged) Python 3 patches from Victor 17:17:07 this morning I approved six or seven patches from Victor which made modifications that enable solum to work with python 3 17:17:31 ok, so that was all about merged patches 17:17:48 next up are few patches that need attention from the cores 17:17:58 Unblocking py27 and py34 gates for Python-solumclient 17:18:04 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/233462/ 17:18:27 muralia, vijendar, james_li: turns out that our py27 and py34 gates for solumclient were failing 17:18:38 ok 17:18:50 above patch from one of our newest contributors fixes the issue 17:18:59 could you please take a moment to review it? 17:19:22 this patch needs one more +2 17:19:34 vijendar: yes 17:19:45 +2 simple fix. 17:19:55 yep 17:20:00 good 17:20:03 awesome 17:20:17 next one is 17:20:20 Update to Glance interaction 17:20:25 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/230588/ 17:20:59 the commit message should give background of the patch 17:21:06 cool. did that work dev. we had discussed this last time 17:21:18 muralia: yes, we had discussed this last time 17:21:34 cool 17:21:39 muralia: I haven't yet checked whether the metadata is getting stored in our db or not 17:21:46 muralia: but I think you were saving it 17:21:46 ok 17:21:54 haven't gotten around to check it yet 17:22:22 currently, without this patch, we cannot even build a lp 17:22:32 glance commands fail 17:22:48 vijendar: you have verified that with this patch we are able to build a lp, right? 17:23:12 yes. I was able to create lp with this patch 17:23:35 thanks for confirming vijendar 17:24:40 so yeah, please take a look at the patch today/tomorrow 17:25:18 this patch also need one more +2 17:25:35 thx muralia 17:25:44 that's right vijendar 17:26:24 james_li: whenever you get few minutes, could you please review this patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/230588/6 17:26:54 ok, moving on to the next one 17:27:00 Adding created_at field for apps 17:27:06 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/231146/ 17:27:08 devkulkarni: will review today 17:27:13 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/230692/ 17:27:17 thanks james_li 17:27:34 above two patches are also from our newest contributor 17:27:58 the patch on the api side adds a 'created_at' field to the app data model 17:28:20 and the patch on the cli side adds this field in the list of fields to be displayed 17:28:43 awesome 17:28:55 looks like the api side patch is approved 17:29:44 I will inform pt_15 (the new contributor) to remove workflow -1 from the cli patch 17:29:58 I had asked her to put it till the api patch gets approved 17:30:09 now that it has been approved, the -1 can be removed 17:30:34 ok, the next one is: Update to Devstack setup https://review.openstack.org/#/c/230222/ 17:30:43 let me give some background on this one 17:31:17 Last couple of weeks, I have been helping pt_15 and vijendar get a working vagrant environment 17:31:43 while checkout the vagrant environment setup and the devstack setup script that we provide in solum repo 17:32:17 I realized that the devstack setup script was missing few key steps which are performing in the Vagrantfile 17:32:26 so this patch adds those missing things 17:32:36 in nutshell, the missing items are: 17:32:49 - nova-docker needs to be setup 17:32:57 - local.conf needs to be provided 17:33:19 - nova's conf file need to be updated with a specific option 17:33:36 above patch adds these steps 17:33:53 I see that muralia has already reviewed the patch 17:34:14 james_li, vijendar: if you can review the patch as well, that will be helpful 17:34:54 devkulkarni: sure. will review 17:35:02 thanks vijendar 17:35:36 ok, that completes all the open items for review 17:35:49 moving on to the next topic 17:36:07 #topic Open Discussion 17:36:19 Support for extras.d going away; will affect our devstack setup 17:36:27 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1504592 17:36:27 Launchpad bug 1504592 in Solum "change-devstack-to-move-away-from-extras.d" [Undecided,Confirmed] - Assigned to venkatamahesh (venkatamaheshkotha) 17:36:45 I don't know if you saw the email regarding extras.d going away 17:37:10 If you have not, take few moments to check it out 17:37:18 I have included it in the bug description 17:38:10 we are looking at 9 more weeks by which the support for extras.d will be removed from devstack 17:38:23 btw, to give some context, 17:39:01 in the devstack repo, there is extras.d folder which contains different projects' extra scripts 17:39:16 these are run during devstack's life-cycle 17:39:53 you might recall that solum provides 70-solum.sh 17:40:28 that file is essentially implements the steps of setting up solum in devstack 17:40:40 there are similar files provided by other projects 17:40:57 all these files are copied into devstack/extras.d/ 17:41:18 and ./stack.sh runs each of them during its execution 17:41:34 so, that is the background 17:41:56 we have one more new contributor venkatmahesh 17:42:01 devkulkarni: thanks for providing some context on this 17:42:14 vijendar: glad this was useful :) 17:42:54 so, venkatmahesh had submitted a blueprint to implement plugin model for solum devstack 17:43:33 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/plugin-model-devstack-integration 17:44:05 On the blueprint I asked whether he will be interested in taking up this bug 17:44:12 and he agreed 17:44:27 I was hoping that he will join us today in the irc meeting.. 17:45:15 we definitely want to get this done sooner than later 17:45:34 ok 17:45:59 alright.. so that is all I had for open discussion today 17:46:22 are there any topics that any of you want to discuss today? 17:47:05 currently my devstack is broken and wanted to check if any one is running into nova issue with devstack! 17:47:37 vijendar: good thing you remembered 17:47:45 I submitted a bug to nova yesterday 17:48:17 devananda: thanks 17:48:25 vijendar: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1505342 17:48:25 Launchpad bug 1505342 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "n-cond throws exception while starting" [Undecided,Incomplete] 17:48:28 devkulkarni: thanks 17:48:59 vijendar: I am going to follow up with the nova team on the bug 17:49:28 you might also want to add comments if you have any specific findings to share within the bug ticket 17:49:35 ok 17:49:42 cool 17:50:49 alright then.. will end meeting early today to give you all 10 minutes back :) 17:51:08 thanks muralia, james_li, vijendar for joining 17:51:19 I will see you next week 17:51:27 in same channel at same time 17:51:44 the week after that is the week of OpenStack summit 17:52:15 we can decide next week whether we want to hold a meeting at that time or cancel it 17:52:44 sure 17:52:54 ok then 17:53:02 #endmeeting