18:02:57 #startmeeting savanna 18:02:57 Meeting started Thu Mar 6 18:02:57 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is SergeyLukjanov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:02:58 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:03:01 The meeting name has been set to 'savanna' 18:03:14 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SavannaAgenda 18:03:21 #topic News / updates 18:03:32 let's start from it to wait for some more folks 18:04:14 #info lawyers response about new name options: "From the trademark search, Sahara and Caravan are the best options." 18:04:27 best or only? 18:04:34 so, I'd like to discuss it later on the meeting 18:05:25 mattf, I've already asked them to clarify that, but I think that we should choose the option that is best from the PoW of lawyers to avoid renaming in future 18:05:37 one more, 3rd renaming, it'll kill me :( 18:05:47 folks, please 18:05:53 share your news/updates 18:06:13 Icehouse 3 released, more info in separated topic 18:06:30 ylobankov, ping 18:06:31 only 2 reviews on api, so no progress there 18:06:55 sorry, I am here 18:07:13 A couple of dashboard bug fixes, a few new bp for the future. 18:07:27 mattf, sorry about that - end of cycle is a difficult time for such huge features - anyway, I'm trying to dedicate some time for reviewing it 18:07:27 I was working on test for transient cluster 18:08:00 alazarev, ErikB, tmckay ? 18:08:20 SergeyLukjanov, eh, it's been over a month.. 18:08:43 I've been tweaking cli tests, currently my environment is messed up with strange errors. I have some examples to add to savanna-extra 18:09:12 ylobankov, the plan is to have two separated lightweight jobs to test transient clusters creation (== trusts usage) on both direct and heat engines, am I right? 18:09:29 Intel finally got environment for openstack development, could probably see contribution to Savanna soon 18:09:30 SergeyLukjanov: yes 18:09:33 tmckay, yup, good start 18:09:58 alazarev, that's nice, anyway we already have about 7 commits from them :) 18:10:21 also, we have a new savanna guy, elmiko. I showed him how to do a gerrit review yesterday :) 18:10:32 Not many updates from our side this week. We are still plugging away at (Ambari) Blueprints. Hope to get back to Savanna proper soon. 18:11:05 ErikB1, we're in FF, so, that's fine ;) 18:11:19 SergeyLukjanov: yeah, but I'm talking about something bigger than changing assertEquals(None, ) to assertNone 18:11:27 ErikB1, anything on the neutron wrapper. it aged out this morning. 18:11:28 tmckay, gerrit is really scary for newcomers :) 18:12:04 sreshetnyak, any updates about vanilla hadoop 2? 18:12:20 tmckay, is elmiko working with you? 18:12:26 hi 18:12:30 mattf: let me follow up on that. 18:12:34 SergeyLukjanov, yes 18:13:20 tmckay, cool 18:13:22 also, Mirantis has customer interested in savanna over multi-region environment, planning to add support of multi-regions (already in J) 18:13:25 basic implementation on vanilla hadoop 2 was merged 18:13:37 alazarev, yup, this bp is approved 18:13:48 sreshetnyak, what's about scaling/testing/edp? 18:14:41 SergeyLukjanov: could you also take care of integration tests for IDH 3.0.2? 18:15:21 in the base implementation has supported scaling, validation, swift and provisioning user configs 18:15:28 sreshetnyak: question for you, not for SergeyLukjanov 18:16:03 alazarev, I don't think that sreshetnyak will be able to finish both plugins till the rc 18:16:11 alazarev, I thought that you'll do it 18:16:16 I mean IDH plugin part 18:17:08 any other news/updates? 18:17:32 let's move on 18:17:34 SergeyLukjanov: will need to learn from Yaroslav how to write integration tests 18:18:05 alazarev, after the completion working on hadoop vanilla 2 plugin :) 18:18:21 sreshetnyak: do you have estimates? 18:18:28 alazarev, please, contact ylobankov and sreshetnyak to clarify how'll help you to write or just write itests for you, it's quite important 18:18:46 alazarev, we'll not include plugin to release notes w/o working itests 18:19:15 alazarev, about 2 weeks 18:19:16 #info design summit sessions proposition site will be open soon 18:19:33 sreshetnyak, it sounds like around the rc 18:20:53 ok, alazarev, sreshetnyak, ylobankov, please discuss it and tell us the plan next time 18:21:04 ok 18:21:08 ok 18:21:13 thanks 18:21:14 #topic Project naming collision 18:21:23 that's the most painfull topic 18:21:37 ok 18:21:47 (double l in painful to mark it especially painful) 18:22:05 so, we have a response from lawyers 18:22:14 "From the trademark search, Sahara and Caravan are the best options." 18:22:34 due to the http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_5dd4f18fde38ce8e Sahara is #2 option and Caravan is #5 18:23:15 we should have included fusor 18:23:36 "Sahara beats Caravan 10–4" 18:24:37 I think that we should avoid any risk to rename again and use options suggested by lawyers 18:25:26 any objections? 18:25:28 agree 18:25:42 agree 18:25:46 I see mattf has some, if still yes, please, add details 18:26:29 oh, mine is a statement of regret. i wish we'd included it. 18:27:03 i'm not suggesting we re-enter the lawyer process or pick something they've not vetted. 18:27:23 did they provide any details on why options were ruled out? 18:27:48 in my experience there are good reasons and it's easy to provide them so we can all understand the reasoning 18:27:51 mattf, not yet, I've requested them, but I'm afraid that it could take a long time again... 18:28:28 the reasoning should be readily available "pick sahara or caravan" is just the executive summary 18:29:20 mattf, probably, http://www.fusor.net or http://www.fxpansion.com/index.php?page=62&tab=185 or something else 18:29:55 anyway, I think that if lawyers say that "Sahara and Caravan are the best options" that it's better to use them 18:30:13 agree 18:30:14 and we've choose them as a top 5 candidates 18:30:50 feels like we're lingering. no one is going to be happy w/ the change. time to rip the bandaid off... 18:31:41 mattf, we need the new name and we had enough time to propose tons of options 18:31:45 we've selected top 5 18:31:54 and the #2 is available 18:31:55 or rather, it's time to rip the adhesive bandage off 18:32:14 SergeyLukjanov: so, do we need a new vote or do you think we can use the one which already won? 18:32:56 mattf: I have opinion from our lawyers that even keeping Savanna should be fine, as long as product doesn't do the same thing 18:33:10 the main problem is that foundation believes we have to remove 18:33:18 and do it before the release 18:33:53 and it based on advise of their lwayers 18:34:10 our judgement call is to comply 18:34:30 yup 18:34:45 the main reason is that we'd like to graduate ;) 18:35:22 good reason 18:35:57 ruhe, IMO "Sahara beats Caravan 10–4" and google.com -> images -> caravan are enough to skip voting 18:36:08 SergeyLukjanov: +1 :) 18:37:00 #vote Choose the new name from the options suggested by lawyers *Sahara and Caravan) as the best from the trademarks pov? Yes, No, Abstain 18:37:06 #startvote Choose the new name from the options suggested by lawyers *Sahara and Caravan) as the best from the trademarks pov? Yes, No, Abstain 18:37:07 Begin voting on: Choose the new name from the options suggested by lawyers *Sahara and Caravan) as the best from the trademarks pov? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain. 18:37:08 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 18:37:13 folks, please 18:37:26 #vote yes 18:37:28 #vote Sahara 18:37:29 tmckay, ErikB1, mattf, sreshetnyak, IlyaE, ^^ 18:37:29 ruhe: Sahara is not a valid option. Valid options are Yes, No, Abstain. 18:37:32 #vote yes 18:37:36 <_nadya_> #vote yes 18:37:38 #vote yes 18:37:39 #voyr yes 18:37:41 #vote ruhe 18:37:41 #vote yes 18:37:42 mattf: ruhe is not a valid option. Valid options are Yes, No, Abstain. 18:37:42 #vote yes 18:37:44 #vote yes 18:37:46 #vote yes 18:37:57 #vote yes 18:38:03 #vote yes 18:38:05 #vote yes 18:38:13 <@openstack> mattf: ruhe is not a valid option. Valid options are Yes, No, Abstain. :( 18:38:21 #vote yes 18:38:55 #vote yes 18:39:01 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/picturegalleries/7198319/The-best-retro-caravans.html?image=11 18:39:27 looks just like an openstack guy 18:39:37 tmckay, ;) 18:39:46 tmckay, OpenStack RetroCaravan, heh 18:39:54 tmckay, oh no, are those jeans cuffed?! 18:40:01 lol 18:40:11 * SergeyLukjanov thinking about RetroCaravan vs. Stackadoop 18:40:20 that would be a close one 18:40:22 lol 18:40:30 #endvote 18:40:31 Voted on "Choose the new name from the options suggested by lawyers *Sahara and Caravan) as the best from the trademarks pov?" Results are 18:40:32 Yes (13): bob_nettleton, ruhe, ErikB1, elmiko, ylobankov, NikitaKonovalov, crobertsrh, tmckay, mattf, SergeyLukjanov, alazarev, _nadya_, sreshetnyak 18:40:40 yay! 18:40:48 democracy! 18:40:52 with total agreement 18:41:28 and as ruhe proposed to just choose Sahara and start renaming 18:41:44 here how democracy works: "you MUST change name, here is #2 and #5 available, please vote!" 18:41:56 alazarev, yup, that's it... 18:42:02 obey the system 18:42:19 voting is a component of democracy 18:42:21 * mattf grins 18:43:05 #starvote Choose "Sahara" w/o additional voting? Yes, No, Abstain 18:43:15 #vote yes 18:43:18 NOTE: "Sahara beats Caravan 10–4" in the first voting round and google.com -> images -> caravan are enough to skip voting 18:43:21 #vote yes 18:43:24 #vote yes 18:43:27 #vote yes 18:43:28 #vote yes 18:43:30 #vote yes 18:43:33 #vote yes 18:43:36 <_nadya_> #vote yes 18:43:44 #vote Abstain 18:43:49 #vote yes 18:43:50 #vote yes 18:43:57 #vote ErikB1 18:44:22 what, no chastising? 18:44:27 #vote abstain 18:44:34 #vote abstain 18:44:35 * mattf isn't good at this voting thing 18:44:54 ooops, I don't see voting bot 18:44:58 openstack, ping 18:45:13 oops, it was a typo 18:45:21 shame on me 18:45:22 star vote! 18:45:24 please, re-vote 18:45:26 *vote! 18:45:35 #startvote Choose "Sahara" w/o additional voting? Yes, No, Abstain 18:45:35 Begin voting on: Choose "Sahara" w/o additional voting? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain. 18:45:36 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 18:45:42 #vote yes 18:45:46 openstack, thank you! 18:45:49 #vote yes 18:45:50 #vote Abstain 18:45:50 #vote yes 18:45:52 #vote yes 18:45:56 <_nadya_> #vote yes 18:45:57 #vote yes 18:45:57 #vote abstain 18:45:57 #vote Abstain 18:45:58 #vote yes 18:46:07 #vote ErikB1 18:46:08 mattf: ErikB1 is not a valid option. Valid options are Yes, No, Abstain. 18:46:16 #vote yes 18:46:16 #vote abstain 18:46:33 mattf: I see, just testing. 18:46:34 #vote yes 18:47:27 we're missing some folks... 18:47:28 IlyaE, ping 18:47:41 I voted 18:47:57 #vote yes 18:47:58 IlyaE: you need to vote again... 18:48:03 IlyaE, one more time please, It wasn't recorded 18:48:40 ok, looks like we have all votes 18:48:43 #endvote 18:48:44 Voted on "Choose "Sahara" w/o additional voting?" Results are 18:48:45 Yes (10): NikitaKonovalov, ylobankov, ruhe, crobertsrh, tmckay, SergeyLukjanov, _nadya_, alazarev, sreshetnyak, IlyaE 18:48:46 Abstain (4): bob_nettleton, mattf, ErikB1, elmiko 18:49:02 noone votes "No" 18:49:10 now we need to vote on pronunciation 18:49:51 har -- like "hair", or like a pirate "arrrrr" 18:50:12 I hear people do both 18:50:18 just curios - mattf, ErikB1, elmiko, bob - do you have any concrete alternative proposals? 18:50:24 tmckay, Russian folks accent will kill any agreement on pronunciation :) 18:50:30 lol 18:50:50 bob_nettleton, mattf, ErikB1, elmiko, which kind of concern do you have? that we need to vote or Sahara name just sucks? 18:51:00 IlyaE: mine were already knocked out in the voting process 18:51:03 IlyaE, not really, i'm new to the project and i'm still getting up to speed on the reasoning for the name change 18:51:21 elmiko, lawyers 18:51:36 tmckay, kk 18:51:48 elmiko, http://www.thetus.com/savanna 18:51:57 tmckay: we pronounce it suh-har-uh (like a pirate) 18:52:12 eh, rather not say 18:52:13 I am +1 with the process and the name we ended up with 18:52:16 ruhe, okay, that works. Just want to be consistent 18:52:30 SergeyLukjanov, i don't have a good suggestion for an alternate and i'm neutral as to what we change to, although it would be cool to have a name that relates to the project. i'm not sure that's possible. 18:52:40 can we close on this topic? 18:52:44 well, I also don't like situation, but we got to do something 18:52:48 I am also +1 with the naming process. No objections on my part. I do like the sound of " 18:52:52 next up and some sort of team to do the renaming? 18:52:54 of "Caravan" 18:53:02 but I'm not opposed to Sahara. 18:53:10 SergeyLukjanov, ty for the link 18:53:11 do we have a scope for the change from the lawyers? 18:53:53 e.g. do we have to change readthedocs, or things is stackforge etc? 18:54:01 mattf, everything 18:54:18 even the sticker on my laptop!? 18:54:19 * mattf kids 18:54:33 I have several stickers too and t-shirts 18:54:43 mattf: even t-shirt which aignatov gave you 18:54:45 * mattf throws his tshirts away 18:54:45 don't know how to change them :( 18:54:49 tho,m they may be collectors items now 18:54:58 mattf, but we'll keep links from old resources and will append (ex. Savanna) to everything ;) 18:55:12 ok, looks like we're in agreement 18:55:24 so, everything on openstack and stackforge 18:55:39 mattf, yup 18:55:43 what about in the code, if a variable has savanna in the name but is not user visible? 18:55:57 probably we should keep old resources with redirect for a while 18:56:03 mattf, eventually we should rename them but not now 18:56:09 alazarev, sure 18:56:22 mattf, you still can find quantum in neutron I think 18:56:24 what's the scope of things that must change? 18:56:30 #agree rename project to "Sahara" 18:56:31 mattf: what about RPM packages? will you have a time to rename? 18:56:47 mattf, user visible stuff, like API, docs 18:57:10 ruhe, depends. in the past name of package != brand name. but it all depends... so there's some guidance needed here. 18:57:57 we'll have new pypi packages too 18:58:17 so, I think rpms should be renamed too 18:58:42 here's the thing. we should probably spend the next 4 weeks w/ the full team removing all references to savanna across the project's history, but we need to prioritize. so i'm keen to find out what MUST be changed and do it first, save the SHOULD for post graduation. 18:58:55 oh, two mins left... I'll email all info about FF, release and etc. 18:58:57 sorry, "we COULD probably spend" 18:59:17 mattf, I'll check the expectations 18:59:21 SergeyLukjanov, did the lawyers provide any guidance on what needs to change? 18:59:23 mattf, and mail details 18:59:25 thanks 18:59:38 mattf, thanks for catching this, good question 18:59:48 folks, let's move to the #savanna channel 18:59:53 thank you all! 18:59:56 #endmeeting