14:01:11 #startmeeting sahara 14:01:16 Meeting started Thu Mar 22 14:01:11 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is tellesnobrega. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:18 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:20 The meeting name has been set to 'sahara' 14:01:27 o/ 14:01:47 o/ 14:01:54 o/ 14:02:02 cool, we are all here 14:02:03 lets start 14:02:08 #topic News/Updates 14:03:33 I'm working on split plugin, as you all have seen there is a spec to review (thanks jeremyfreudberg for the comments). Other than that I did a little to include soci on mapr images using sahara-image-pack (please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554334/ ) 14:03:42 this week I don't have time work on upstream. no updates :( 14:03:49 thanks tosky for the comments on that spec too 14:03:59 i don't have much to report this week, btw 14:04:12 and also I have worked out a solution for the file copy bug 14:04:31 yes, thanks tosky, just saw you posted comments (lots of them :) ) 14:05:19 I will be working on that spec and code the rest of the week 14:05:43 it's related to the API stuff that we talked about face to face 14:05:52 yes 14:06:54 on my side, I helped with the storyboard migration, reviewed few patches (like the soci one), and few related to doc changes 14:07:25 and finally fixed the experimental multinode job with spark in native zuul v3 format 14:07:32 \o/ 14:07:48 yup, thanks tosky 14:08:21 I created a story to track the remaining zuul v3 jobs (with a task for each job) 14:08:26 (perfect use case for storyboard) 14:08:34 true 14:08:44 quick question about that story (or storyboard in general, again) 14:09:19 this one, just in case: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2001686 14:09:47 my question: it doesn't auto-link to gerrit reviews (for tasks in "review" state)? 14:10:02 especially because the gerrit bot has commented anyway, it seems strange 14:10:07 maybe i'm missing something 14:10:21 there is a bug 14:10:30 we asked that at least twice during the PTG 14:10:49 alright, if it's already a known defect then we won't spend the meeting time on it 14:10:51 and I also asked on #storyboard last week 14:10:57 it broke after some upgrade of gerrit, and the code involves a java plugin for gerrit 14:10:59 so much fun 14:11:03 yup 14:11:14 but people know about it 14:11:45 and as more projects are going to migrate, I hope that some more time will be allocated 14:11:46 no more news/updates? 14:12:22 hi zchkun 14:12:47 hi jeremyfreudberg 14:12:53 sorry, l am late 14:13:08 no worries 14:13:26 do you have any news/updates on what you worked this past week? 14:14:12 It is still going on 14:14:26 hi 14:14:29 vanilla upgrade right? 14:14:33 hi rtsisyk 14:14:49 yes 14:14:57 (hi rtsisyk, i will respond to your latest email) 14:15:26 cool zchkun, let us know if you need anything 14:15:45 rtsisyk, any news/updates that you can share about your work this past week? 14:16:30 I've just started. My plan is to upgrade Ambari to 2.6. 14:16:33 It may take a little time 14:17:02 rtsisyk, awesome. You may want to talk to gokhan (he was on sahara channel this week) 14:17:31 he reported that his team successfully created and deployed a HDP 2.6 with ambari 2.6 cluster 14:17:48 wow 14:17:55 I'll ping him 14:18:03 cool 14:18:39 sorry, leaved for a moment. I am back. 14:18:51 rtsisyk, welcome join sahara 14:19:34 ook 14:19:37 lets move on 14:19:48 #topic Rocky priorities 14:20:22 I would like to take some time to review what we have as priorities for rocky, so we can organize everyone's work to match that 14:20:42 we have the etherpad from ptg 14:20:59 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-rocky-ptg 14:21:41 basically as a team we need to try to follow that priority list as much as possibel 14:21:51 possible 14:22:30 I recently added a point to the list 14:22:47 decommission of a specific node 14:23:25 if you all recall from last cycle, I started working on it, but it will only be present on apiv2 so I set it aside for a bit 14:23:32 but I had to put it back there 14:24:00 I don't want to waste time now to go through the list, but lets all take a look and make sure we don't go too far 14:25:39 every is ok with that? have any comments? 14:26:10 we have work to do :D 14:26:15 true 14:26:26 lets get it done :) 14:26:27 oh, for APIv2 maybe we can create a story and tooooons of connected tasks 14:26:59 looks about right, perhaps spark wrapper fix needs to be higher (and goes back to what i said at vPTG, we just need to start the investigations earlier in the cycle) 14:27:08 yeah, let's create some apiv2 story stuff 14:27:14 that sounds like a good idea 14:28:23 ok 14:29:05 jeremyfreudberg, I think that we should investigate wrapper right away, and if the work is complex it should go up higher on the priority list 14:29:08 what do you thinkw 14:29:09 ? 14:29:17 sounds right to me 14:29:22 cool 14:30:51 lets move on 14:31:15 does anyone have specific topics to discuss? 14:32:04 we should probably review zchkun's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539856/ again, we let it go by for a month (oops) 14:32:14 I have a question for shuyingy_, which I probably asked already (sorry for that): should https://review.openstack.org/#/c/538728/ , if merged, be backported to queens? 14:32:24 true jeremyfreudberg 14:34:09 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/538728/ should be merged and backport, so I recheck it to remind you guys. 14:34:33 I will take a look shuyingy_ today 14:34:42 once it merges, please propose backport 14:35:43 #topic Open Discussion 14:36:20 quick thing here, I look into making at least one more person as stable/branch core (don't know how to do it yet) 14:36:21 about zckun's patch, I have reviewed the abandon one before. The new one is ready to merge. And we plan to have a client. 14:36:46 shuyingy_, can you paste the link here? 14:37:01 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539856/ 14:37:31 abandon one is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537607/ 14:37:34 ok 14:38:01 shuyingy_, have you tried to scale the cluster with that patch? 14:38:14 I would like to ask jeremyfreudberg. What state about the Sahara client support APIv2 14:38:33 you mean keypair injection one? yes :) 14:39:06 shuyingy_, regular python client supports apiv2, but i don't have openstack cli support at this time 14:39:36 This one is first patch I instruct zckun. I have pay more attention about it. So I have tested it in my env 14:39:53 thanks, jeremyfreudberg 14:40:06 shuyingy_, that's good that you have tested the patch. i will review 14:40:44 same for me 14:40:55 zckun. have you made new change since last time I tested it? 14:41:52 sorry, it is a long time, mybe have a little change 14:42:20 shuyingy_, and jeremyfreudberg just to be sure, we better test it again. But it looks ok 14:43:40 The bad thing is that my server has been recalled because QA team in my company need it do a large scale test. 14:43:53 I will try to test it again 14:43:55 no worries, I can test it here 14:44:13 and let you know how it goes, I can do it early next week 14:44:50 thanks :) can you test this patch together? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508099/ 14:45:07 sure 14:45:09 shuyingy_, I change the keypair type to bool , not string 14:45:26 zchkun, ack 14:46:48 i have to leave a little early, any other topics? 14:47:05 not from me 14:47:09 not from me 14:47:19 when try to scale the cluster just with the existence of keypair 14:47:20 tosky, shuyingy_ , zchkun, rtsisyk ? 14:47:51 not from me 14:48:24 nothing else from me 14:48:40 we can close the meeting early today 14:48:42 thanks all 14:48:52 as always, let me know if you need any help 14:49:37 thanks :) 14:49:37 #endmeeting