14:00:35 #startmeeting sahara 14:00:36 Meeting started Thu Apr 7 14:00:35 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is elmiko. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:38 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:40 The meeting name has been set to 'sahara' 14:00:42 #chair vgridnev 14:00:43 Current chairs: elmiko vgridnev 14:00:50 #chair SergeyLukjanov 14:00:50 o/ 14:00:50 Current chairs: SergeyLukjanov elmiko vgridnev 14:00:54 hi =) 14:00:54 hi 14:00:59 hello 14:01:04 hey folks 14:01:43 #topic News / updates 14:01:54 Hello everyone 14:02:02 it's announced that Mitaka was released! 14:02:06 \o/ 14:02:54 also, FYI: 14:02:57 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/governance+branch:master+topic:sahara-tags 14:03:14 hi 14:03:20 vgridnev: that's nice to see 14:03:22 this additional tags for sahara in governance ^^ 14:03:24 so, rejoice! 14:03:25 hello/ 14:04:53 i've mainly been working on my presentation for openstack summit, and some internal stuff 14:05:07 although, i am happy to see that the service.api refactor spec got merged =) 14:05:46 i am working on prepearing sahara-tests for release, added filters for jobs on sahara-ci 14:06:10 I am testing my changes which I have made w.r.t API v2 development on my local environment. Once tested will send the patch for review 14:06:24 working on moving tempest API tests, almost ready (and thanks again to SergeyLukjanov, vgridnev and esikachev for the time spent and the support) 14:06:42 I am going through sahara service api now 14:06:55 I've had a couple of fixes for a couple of ugly UI issues.... 14:07:27 One patch seems to break the integration tests, but I'm not sure why. Any tips would be great since I'm currently unable to run the integration tests locally. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/301789/ 14:08:12 crobertsrh, ok, I will try soon 14:08:14 o/ I'm mostly busy with intrnal stuff, but promiss elmiko to start working on slides 14:08:35 it's important fix for us, I think 14:08:39 NikitaKonovalov_: awesome =) 14:09:32 anything else new? 14:10:07 #topic API v2 progress 14:10:17 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273316/ 14:10:19 ok 14:10:22 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sahara/api-v2 14:10:34 elmiko, how is it going? 14:10:44 just waiting for some reviews on 14:10:46 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/298464/ 14:10:56 then i'm hoping to add more patches on top 14:11:11 i'm happy to hear that pgadiya and Poornima are getting up to speed as well =) 14:11:16 i've approved today spec about service.api, so going to take look on patch above 14:11:22 yea, thanks vgridnev 14:11:31 ok, cool 14:11:33 otherwise, not much to report 14:11:46 ok, next then 14:11:51 #topic Scenario tests releases (tosky, esikachev) 14:12:26 folks, what do we need additional in the first release of sahara-tests? 14:12:41 for release, i think, we need this patches#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295717/ #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295110/ 14:12:54 as anticipated before, I'm testing the tempest tests converted as tempest plugin inside sahara-tests - I'd like to have it as well, coming before end of today 14:13:42 * tmckay is here but distracted by another meeting where he has to talk ... 14:13:49 agree with both reviews esikachev pointed out; I reviewed one, and I was collecting details about reno 14:13:57 I think that we need to make release till end of the next week, I think. Or if it will be possible to in the begging of the next week. 14:14:10 I think that the reno one should have few other details 14:14:28 vgridnev: +1 for begging of the next week 14:14:49 tosky: ok 14:14:50 ops, beginning, I think 14:14:57 beginning is better than begging :) 14:15:13 hehe 14:15:23 :) 14:15:25 I will take another look on reno stuff then 14:15:34 ok, anything else? 14:15:57 thats all from me 14:15:58 not from my side 14:16:02 #topic Newton summit topics and schedule preparing (vgridnev, NikitaKonovalov) 14:16:53 ok, first. Sad news: I'm not going to summit this time, btw I have crazy ideas to join via Hangouts or something like that 14:17:26 sad that you won't be there, but having the hangout will be good =) 14:17:27 NikitaKonovalov will be my representative at the summit 14:17:37 If the conference network permits :) 14:17:43 good point 14:17:54 vgridnev, elmiko me too 14:18:04 on hangout 14:18:12 great 14:18:22 hopefully the laptops won't outnumber us ;) 14:18:27 oh, forgot link 14:18:30 #link #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-newton-summit 14:18:45 Sounds like one or more of us should try to get some sort of meeting solution set up and communicate it to others during summit 14:19:19 crobertsrh: do you mean like online meeting solution? 14:19:23 Yeah 14:19:44 +1 14:19:44 Of course, time zone might also impact people's chance to attend "remotely" 14:20:05 I think Austin is UTC-6, right? 14:20:16 that sounds about right 14:20:48 about schedule: most of meeting are going to be started at the morning, so I for sure will have abilities to join 14:21:15 That is good 14:22:01 we have draft schedule already in etherpad, I think that we should spend next meeting to finalise schedule 14:22:15 vgridnev: +1 14:22:18 I will be out next week 14:22:24 I think elmiko and tmckay will be as well 14:22:39 oh, next meeting? Yeah. 14:22:43 yea, gonna miss next weeks meeting. oops 14:23:03 but, i can certainly follow along if we propose something via email 14:23:09 We can always discuss in the regular channel if there's anything we can't address today 14:23:41 +1, then I think that I will start finalising schedule together with Nikita 14:24:04 I guess that we will need chairs for sessions, right? 14:24:04 just propose it to the ML once you and NikitaKonovalov_ have a plan 14:24:09 yes 14:24:15 At a first look, I don't see anything controversial on the schedule pad at the moment 14:24:25 i will volunteer to run the apiv2 and security sessions, as is tradition ;) 14:24:52 I'll run the UI session, per tradition 14:24:58 (assuming we use them) 14:25:04 So, if you want to lead a session, please post this data to ether pad, so that we will have ability to understand that 14:25:12 ack 14:25:16 I will heckle crobertsrh in the UI session, so that's covered 14:25:26 whew, thanks tmckay 14:25:34 wow... 14:25:48 i will heckle tmckay heckling crobertsrh XD 14:25:56 HA :) 14:26:00 You get him good elmiko, he deserves it 14:26:08 I will break the cycle of violence by not heckling elmiko 14:26:09 gotta preserve the chain of responsibility 14:26:15 hahaha! 14:26:40 egafford, you will be mocked for that. Mocking is different than heckling 14:26:53 #action vgridnev, NikitaKonovalov to prepare draft schedule at post results in ML 14:28:15 ok, anything else that we should cover in there? 14:28:31 BTW, please continue collecting ideas 14:28:54 More ideas is better always 14:29:23 elmiko, If we write a patch do we need to share it on same branch 14:29:36 #topic Revisiting Sahara Blueprints 14:29:45 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273316/ is already merged to git 14:29:49 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-bp-revisit 14:30:11 so, we have few blueprints to discuss 14:30:18 or we need file a bug and create branch across that bug ? 14:30:36 Poornima: if you use the "Partial-Implements: bp v2-api-experimental-imp" in your commit message, it will be put on the appropriate topic 14:30:58 Poornima: no need to file a bug 14:31:13 there are few blueprints that we should mark to implemented state, I guess 14:31:13 just make sure to use the "Partial-Implements" tag in your commit message 14:31:29 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sahara/+spec/cluster-creation-with-trust 14:31:41 got you :) 14:31:46 is it true that this one is implemented ^^ 14:32:04 i /think/ it's fully implemented 14:32:38 ok, then 14:32:42 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sahara/+spec/scalable-savanna 14:32:44 +1; I believe that you and I finished that off vgridnev. 14:32:57 (Re: trusts, not scalability.) 14:33:18 egafford, got it 14:34:14 Scalability bp seems done as of Kilo (by default settings,) yes? 14:34:35 yea, seems like it 14:34:42 for me too, ok 14:35:02 and this one, finally: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sahara/+spec/fake-test-plugin 14:35:21 do we want to extend fake plugin in some way? 14:35:25 not sure if we achieved all those goals, but i thought fake plugin was in 14:35:31 It's mostly done, isn't it? 14:35:39 I can't think of ways that it's not done 14:35:46 right 14:37:18 ok, then it's implemented. I guess that it was done for heat / direct engine testing, and it good enough in our gates 14:37:30 sounds good 14:38:10 and finally, there are two blueprints, which are looks strange for me: 14:38:11 it was done for upstream gates, so they don't require a full image build 14:38:16 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sahara/+spec/cluster-suspend-resume 14:38:23 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sahara/+spec/development-environment-vagrant 14:38:54 that suspend/resume sounds complicated 14:39:01 we have spec approved there, but with out actual details of implementation 14:39:33 imo, we should drop the vagrant one in favor of a playbook for kolla 14:39:57 (which would by definition include an ansible route for deploying sahara) 14:40:22 elmiko: +1; personally I love vagrant, but reuse of OpenStack ecosystem tools will only improve all our lives in the long run. 14:40:40 +1 for ansible/kolla 14:40:41 egafford: ... when they make sense 14:40:55 pino|work: Valid, but kolla's kinda great, though young. 14:40:57 it's a nice idea, and i don't have an active objection to it. but if we are talking about designating resources, my preference is for kolla. 14:41:18 egafford: it was a general note, not directed to kolla 14:41:46 regardless of the kolla integration, having an ansible playbook for sahara would be awesome 14:41:46 (it actually was targeted to something else, but that's mildly ot) 14:42:31 I don't see the drafter in the meeting at the moment. 14:43:01 ok, it looks like we agreed about invalidating vagrant spec 14:43:07 yea, haven't see him in awhile 14:43:18 Yeah, it's been dead since Sept. 2014. 14:43:43 about suspend stuff, I think that we should remove spec, and keep that as idea 14:44:04 i'm ok with that, we probably need to rewrite the spec anyway 14:44:08 Yeah, fine idea, just not likely to happen anytime "soon" 14:44:46 ok, thanks folks 14:44:55 let's move on then 14:45:19 #topic Open discussion 14:45:48 anything additional that we should to discuss? 14:46:14 nothing from me 14:46:17 Nothing from me 14:46:40 I'm going to prepare fixes to put in stable/mitaka shortly, just FYI. 14:46:57 since stable/mitaka is now opened for post-release things 14:48:04 Yes, I think the 2 cosmetic, but ugly UI fixes should be backported 14:48:22 crobertsrh, +1 14:48:50 anything else? 14:49:04 vgridnev: suspend and resume will move to N? 14:49:17 huichun, for jobs? 14:49:23 Yes 14:49:50 yes, N is now opened, let's make that happen 14:50:20 5 14:50:26 4 14:50:29 3 14:50:30 2 14:50:36 1 14:50:42 a long 1 14:50:44 thanks, folks! 14:50:45 lol 14:50:47 thanks all 14:50:51 #endmeeting