12:17:44 #startmeeting rpm_packaging 12:17:45 Meeting started Thu May 4 12:17:44 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is toabctl. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 12:17:46 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 12:17:48 The meeting name has been set to 'rpm_packaging' 12:17:51 ping toabctl, dirk, apevec, aplanas, IgorYozhikov, jpena, jruzicka, number80, kaslcrof 12:17:52 o/ 12:17:57 o/ 12:18:06 o/ 12:18:09 #chair jpena IgorYozhikov dirk number80 12:18:10 Current chairs: IgorYozhikov dirk jpena number80 toabctl 12:18:28 as usual, please add your topics to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-rpm-packaging 12:21:18 let's start 12:21:49 #topic python3 again (toabctl) 12:22:36 just wanted to ask (again) if there is some feedback for the singlespec approach 12:23:27 jpena, IgorYozhikov did you find some time to look into that? 12:23:57 I've had some look at it, but wanted to wait for number80's feedback 12:24:32 ok. cool 12:24:48 IgorYozhikov, if you don't have any feedback, we can go to the next topic :) 12:25:44 I discussed about py3 locally(MOS side) & unfortunately support of py3 is not necessary from perspective of view from mgmt side 12:25:58 aka there are no resources for that 12:25:59 toabctl: sorry for late join, I added a topic 12:26:13 and there is no demand 12:26:24 IgorYozhikov, ok. 12:26:28 so, for now MOS will continue to support only py2 12:27:02 because it will require a lot of efforts to support py3 versions of all python dependencies 12:27:03 IgorYozhikov, but if the work would be done by others, would you be ok to add py3 support? 12:27:19 toabctl, I'm fine with py3 12:27:23 at least to the packages we maintain in rpm-packaging? 12:27:34 ok. that's good 12:27:37 next topic? 12:27:54 but MOS CI will not be able to validate them, I mean py3 parts 12:28:09 because we are using centos 7 as the base layer 12:28:47 and a lot of py3 should be rebuild from scratch of backported from Fedora for example 12:29:26 and here I want to ask, can we figure out a solution like if with_py3 ? 12:29:34 for our templates 12:29:59 I guess yes. 12:31:05 if so, that will be good 12:33:13 anything else about py3? 12:34:01 not from me 12:34:17 it looks like the action item needs to be recorded? 12:34:48 dirk, which item? 12:36:01 #action number80 provide feedback on python3 singlespec approach 12:36:38 It's a bit rude to put him on that but since jpena and number80 already talked about that I hope he'll forgive us :) 12:36:46 dirk, number80 is not here so he does not know about it :) 12:36:58 I guess he will :) 12:37:25 #topic RDO gate voting 12:37:27 dirk, ^^ 12:38:09 just wanted to reiterate on this, because I forgot track 12:38:19 I think the rdo gate is stable and providing good test results at least for master 12:38:22 I would like to have it voting 12:38:26 any concerns, opinions about that? 12:39:00 +1 for making it voting 12:39:18 I think it's a good moment to do it. I've just migrated the VM hosting the repos to a better cloud, and I'm on my way to fixing the issues we had with stable/ocata 12:39:31 + 1 12:40:04 let's make RDO CI vote ... :) 12:40:37 iirc, all we had to do was to change some ACLs in gerrit, right? 12:41:48 jpena: its a small config change in the zuul layout as well 12:41:48 jpena, I do not remember what exactly should be done now, might be dirk knows? 12:42:05 so we need to allow it to vote, and the zuul need s to report the vote resolt 12:42:06 right, zuul layout 12:42:06 result 12:42:25 I'll fix the permissions in gerrit so that it can vote 12:44:09 done 12:44:39 should we vote for such change? 12:44:47 I mean +1 12:44:52 +1 12:45:13 +1 12:45:14 I'm about PR in gerrit:) 12:45:26 jpena: https://github.com/SUSE-Cloud/automation/blob/master/hostscripts/zuul/layout.yaml#L14 and following lines are the magic I think 12:46:07 dirk: ah ok, I see 12:46:10 it's fixed already 12:46:14 ah, need to jump out fro 5 min :( 12:46:21 s/fro/for/ 12:47:51 next? 12:48:00 we're running out of time in 13 min 12:48:05 toabctl: ^^ 12:48:21 #topic packages reviews 12:48:32 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/rpm-packaging+status:open 12:49:12 I'll go over them and merge where possible 12:49:25 are there any reviews where a discussion is needed? 12:50:10 I've been a bit slow on this 12:50:12 jpena, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451617/ could be merged 12:50:15 I'll also check it out today as time permits 12:50:32 there was a major outage for the suse ci for the last days 12:50:47 I tried rechecking everything but maybe I missed something. please check that suse ci voted +1 12:50:52 are we not waiting for the MOS CI? 12:51:08 true 12:51:19 IgorYozhikov, could you check https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451617/ please? 12:51:45 #topic OpenFloor 12:51:48 (to clarify: due to the jenkins security update we had to update to java 1.8 and that had some fallout including not running jobs at all anymore) 12:51:49 anything else ? 12:52:18 denver PTG? 12:52:31 I think I might go there (approvals still missing) 12:53:09 when is it? 12:53:27 mid september 12:53:43 ok. I'm sure I'll not go 12:54:44 I might go, but that depends on approvals 12:54:56 I heard there is room planning ongoing, I hope IgorYozhikov is checking emails on that 12:55:57 let's discuss it next week when IgorYozhikov is back. or during the week in #openstack-rpm-packaging 12:56:08 I have another meeting now so let's close it here 12:56:12 wfm 12:56:28 if there is something else -> #openstack-rpm-packaging 12:56:32 thanks everybody 12:56:34 #endmeeting