13:00:37 #startmeeting rpm_packaging 13:00:38 Meeting started Thu Feb 16 13:00:37 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is IgorYozhikov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:39 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:00:41 The meeting name has been set to 'rpm_packaging' 13:00:57 ping toabctl, dirk, apevec, aplanas, IgorYozhikov, jpena, jruzicka, number80, kaslcrof, aplanas 13:02:18 hi 13:02:28 hi 13:03:30 #chair IgorYozhikov toabctl 13:03:31 Current chairs: IgorYozhikov toabctl 13:04:22 let's spend a couple of minutes on agenda https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-rpm-packaging 13:04:43 o/ 13:05:33 number80, r u with us? 13:08:01 let's start? 13:08:11 toabctl, yes, think so 13:08:30 #topic PTG status and questions 13:08:58 I prepared a list of topics - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-atlanta-packaging-rpm 13:09:38 dirk added also a topic 13:09:46 I believe that it was already posted on openstack-rpm-packaging channel 13:10:52 so what do you want to discuss here? 13:11:01 I saw yes, py3 support was partly discussed in Barcelona as I remember 13:11:23 but without any conclusion, right? 13:11:33 yep 13:12:22 we agreed that eventually we as a project will do that 13:13:34 but we need to figure out the details 13:14:48 anything else on this topic? 13:14:57 sure, because of enabling py3 will extend amount of dependencies 13:15:30 toabctl, I want to clarify org questions related to PTG 13:16:53 number80, was in charge of preparation to PTG if I'm not mistaken 13:16:54 what exactly? 13:17:01 who is going 13:17:19 we have requested a room 13:17:35 https://www.openstack.org/ptg/ 13:17:38 me and dirk are going 13:17:44 iirc number8p is also going 13:17:53 number80, pardon 13:17:58 not sure about the room 13:18:37 according to link above we have confirmed room for mon & tue 13:19:18 which link? 13:19:25 https://www.openstack.org/ptg/ 13:19:36 Event layout 13:19:46 Here are the confirmed team rooms so far: 13:20:04 ok. got it 13:20:23 I guess we will find each other there ?) 13:20:40 and number80 seems to be absent currently... 13:21:34 another question - we agreed on remote access to work sessions 13:21:41 we did? 13:21:46 how should that work? 13:22:19 toabctl, yes - a couple of times it was discussed before and after NY holidays 13:22:32 we are just 3 people afaics and I guess we are not working on packaging the whole 2 days 13:23:04 might via webrtc like jit.si 13:23:07 iirc we all 3 need to attend the requirements session too 13:23:55 ok, I'll try to reach number80 with this questions 13:24:13 ok 13:24:26 you could also write a mail to openstack-dev and ask there 13:24:27 I'm not going, my US visa expired 13:24:33 working on new one 13:24:37 arg. to bad 13:25:05 yes 13:25:17 ok, let's move forward 13:25:31 #topic proposing to add aplanas as core 13:25:43 hi 13:25:52 my topic - I would like to propose aplanas as a core reviewer 13:26:01 +1 13:26:11 he did a lot of reviews in the past. See http://stackalytics.com/?metric=marks&project_type=all&module=packaging-rpm-group 13:26:26 +1 13:26:31 and having more cores would speed up things from time to time I guess 13:26:46 cool 13:27:12 #agreed on add aplanas as core 13:27:18 thanks : ) 13:27:22 IgorYozhikov, could you write (as PTL) the usual core-reviewer proposal mail to openstack-dev where people can add their +1s ? 13:27:52 toabctl, sure 13:28:23 will do today 13:28:59 #action IgorYozhikov writes mail to openstack-dev to propose aplanas for core-reviewer 13:29:02 IgorYozhikov, thx 13:29:08 next topic? 13:29:12 yes 13:29:35 #topic packages reviews (https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/rpm-packaging+status:open ) 13:30:44 anything special in the queue you want to discuss? 13:31:01 +1 foraplanas 13:31:23 hey number80 :) 13:32:15 * IgorYozhikov want to confess that was to busy to proceed with nova & neutron during last week. Going to proceed with them tomorrow. 13:32:27 same for me. sorry for that 13:33:23 toabctl, number80 - want to ask - what should we do with hanged commits 13:33:24 ? 13:33:27 * number80 still jet-lagged 13:33:53 IgorYozhikov, which hanged commits? 13:33:55 maybe just abandon them if they were inactive for too long 13:34:00 +1 13:34:09 toabctl, https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/rpm-packaging+status:open,25 4 example 13:34:31 September, October 13:35:11 as number80 said, abandon 13:35:23 It looks like it will be good if someone from us or I will triage a queue 13:36:33 and give a heads up to author, if no response - abandon in 2 days 13:38:02 colleagues what do you think about ^ 13:38:19 just go ahead and do it :) 13:38:34 good 13:38:46 yep, agreed 13:39:33 we have no anything to review for pymod2pkg 13:39:59 but 3 hanged PRs for https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/renderspec+status:open 13:40:06 we need a new release from the suse side for the glareclient fix 13:40:47 I'lll take care about that 13:41:17 toabctl, thanx 13:41:20 so 13:41:28 #topic - Open Floor 13:43:37 do we have topics to discuss? 13:43:52 not from my side 13:43:53 nothing here 13:44:01 number80, do we have a room at the PTG? 13:44:15 yep, good question. 13:44:18 Yes, it was requested 13:44:38 number80, you'll be there, right? 13:44:48 https://www.openstack.org/ptg/ 13:44:50 Yup 13:44:55 number80, have you chance to look though https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-atlanta-packaging-rpm 13:45:05 ok. then let's figure it out there where we meet 13:45:20 I'm going to add this etherpad to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTG/Pike/Etherpads 13:45:22 yes 13:45:39 ah, it's already there 13:45:42 IgorYozhikov, I did that already 13:45:54 toabctl, thanx again 13:47:20 anything else colleagues? 13:48:01 nope 13:48:29 same 13:49:37 nope 13:49:42 let's end the meeting 13:49:48 #endmeeting